Showing 412 of 412 total issues
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
long high = ((arr[pos++] & 0xff) << 24) | ((arr[pos++] & 0xff) << 16) | ((arr[pos++] & 0xff) << 8)
| (arr[pos++] & 0xff); /* sign extension may take place - will be shifted away =) */
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 86.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
long low = ((arr[pos++] & 0xff) << 24) | ((arr[pos++] & 0xff) << 16) | ((arr[pos++] & 0xff) << 8)
| (arr[pos++] & 0xff); /* sign extension may take place - handle below */
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 86.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFC90FDAA22168C234C4C6628B80DC1CD1" +
"29024E088A67CC74020BBEA63B139B22514A08798E3404DD" +
"EF9519B3CD3A431B302B0A6DF25F14374FE1356D6D51C245" +
"E485B576625E7EC6F44C42E9A637ED6B0BFF5CB6F406B7ED" +
"EE386BFB5A899FA5AE9F24117C4B1FE649286651ECE45B3D" +
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 86.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
"FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFC90FDAA22168C234C4C6628B80DC1CD1" +
"29024E088A67CC74020BBEA63B139B22514A08798E3404DD" +
"EF9519B3CD3A431B302B0A6DF25F14374FE1356D6D51C245" +
"E485B576625E7EC6F44C42E9A637ED6B0BFF5CB6F406B7ED" +
"EE386BFB5A899FA5AE9F24117C4B1FE649286651ECE45B3D" +
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 86.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method create
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static KeyMaterial create(String hashAlgo, byte[] H, BigInteger K, byte[] SessionID, int keyLengthCS,
int blockSizeCS, int macLengthCS, int keyLengthSC, int blockSizeSC, int macLengthSC)
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void run()
{
while (true)
{
byte[] msg;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method readLineRN
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public final static int readLineRN(InputStream is, byte[] buffer) throws IOException
{
int pos = 0;
boolean need10 = false;
int len = 0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void run()
{
synchronized (todolist)
{
while (true)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method run
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void run()
{
try
{
c.cm.sendOpenConfirmation(c);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method write
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void write(SFTPv3FileHandle handle, long fileOffset, byte[] src, int srcoff, int len) throws IOException
{
checkHandleValidAndOpen(handle);
while (len > 0)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parseTokens
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String[] parseTokens(String source, char delimiter)
{
if (source.length() == 0)
return new String[0];
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method addHostkeyToFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public final static void addHostkeyToFile(File knownHosts, String[] hostnames, String serverHostKeyAlgorithm,
byte[] serverHostKey) throws IOException
{
if ((hostnames == null) || (hostnames.length == 0))
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Need at least one hostname specification");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method rawFingerPrint
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static byte[] rawFingerPrint(String type, String keyType, byte[] hostkey)
{
MessageDigest dig = null;
try {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method recommendHostkeyAlgorithms
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String[] recommendHostkeyAlgorithms(String hostname) {
List<String> preferredAlgos = new ArrayList<>();
List<PublicKey> keys = getAllKeys(hostname);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private void get(String remoteFiles[], OutputStream[] targets) throws IOException
{
Session sess = null;
if ((remoteFiles == null) || (targets == null))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method readOid
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public String readOid() throws IOException
{
int type = readByte() & 0xff;
if (type != 0x06)
Method openFile
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private SFTPv3FileHandle openFile(String fileName, int flags, SFTPv3FileAttributes attr) throws IOException
{
int req_id = generateNextRequestID();
TypesWriter tw = new TypesWriter();
Method readLink
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public String readLink(String path) throws IOException
{
int req_id = generateNextRequestID();
TypesWriter tw = new TypesWriter();
Method canonicalPath
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public String canonicalPath(String path) throws IOException
{
int req_id = generateNextRequestID();
TypesWriter tw = new TypesWriter();
Method run
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void run()
{
while (true)
{
byte[] msg;