consul/consul

View on GitHub
app/models/budget/heading.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
15 mins
Test Coverage

Specify a :dependent option. (https://rails.rubystyle.guide#has_many-has_one-dependent-option)
Open

    has_many :content_blocks
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/budget/heading.rb by rubocop

This cop looks for has_many or has_one associations that don't specify a :dependent option. It doesn't register an offense if :through option was specified.

Example:

# bad
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :comments
  has_one :avatar
end

# good
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :comments, dependent: :restrict_with_exception
  has_one :avatar, dependent: :destroy
  has_many :patients, through: :appointments
end

Specify a :dependent option. (https://rails.rubystyle.guide#has_many-has_one-dependent-option)
Open

    has_many :investments
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/budget/heading.rb by rubocop

This cop looks for has_many or has_one associations that don't specify a :dependent option. It doesn't register an offense if :through option was specified.

Example:

# bad
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :comments
  has_one :avatar
end

# good
class User < ActiveRecord::Base
  has_many :comments, dependent: :restrict_with_exception
  has_one :avatar, dependent: :destroy
  has_many :patients, through: :appointments
end

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    class Translation
      validate :name_uniqueness_by_budget

      def name_uniqueness_by_budget
        if budget.headings
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/budget/heading.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
app/models/budget/group.rb on lines 9..16

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status