Showing 42 of 42 total issues
File GenericRedisCache.js
has 748 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
'use strict'
const redis = global.redisInstance
const RedisKeyTypeEnum = require('../enums/RedisKeyTypeEnum')
GenericRedisCache
has 46 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class GenericRedisCache {
/**
* Default attrs to define the `cache` model
*
Function delete
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async delete(keys) {
try {
let deletedValues = []
if (this.isKeyValid(keys)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _getKeysNotCached
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async _getKeysNotCached(keys, objects) {
let keysNotCached = []
if (keys) {
if (keys.constructor.name == 'Object') {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getKeyName
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static getKeyName(key) {
const idsIndexes = GenericRedisCache
.getIdIndexes(this.ATTRS.keyName)
let keyName = null
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getKeyName
has 66 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static getKeyName(key) {
const idsIndexes = GenericRedisCache
.getIdIndexes(this.ATTRS.keyName)
let keyName = null
Function setList
has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async setList(objects) {
try {
let redisResponse = null
if (!(objects instanceof Array))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _getKeysNotCached
has 58 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async _getKeysNotCached(keys, objects) {
let keysNotCached = []
if (keys) {
if (keys.constructor.name == 'Object') {
Function getKeyNamesObjects
has 55 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static getKeyNamesObjects(object, ids) {
const keyNameObjects = []
if (object && object.constructor.name == 'Object' && ids instanceof Array) {
if (ids.length && ids[0].constructor.name == 'Object' ) {
const paramsKeys = Object.keys(object)
Function set
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async set(key, value = undefined, jsonPath = GenericJSONCache.DEFAULT_PATH, commands = redis) {
try {
let redisResponse = null
if (this.isKeyValid(key)) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function delete
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async delete(keys) {
try {
let deletedValues = []
if (this.isKeyValid(keys)) {
Function getKeyNames
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async getKeyNames(keys) {
let keyNames = []
if (keys) {
if (
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function getKeyNames
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async getKeyNames(keys) {
let keyNames = []
if (keys) {
if (
Function getListCache
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async getListCache(keyNames, fields, commands = redis) {
const cachedValues = []
if (keyNames && !(keyNames instanceof Array))
keyNames = [keyNames]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setCache
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static setCache(keyName, value, attr = DEFAULT_PATH, commands = redis) {
let command = null
let valueTemp = value
if (keyName) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setList
has 33 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async setList(objects) {
try {
let redisResponse = null
if (!(objects instanceof Array))
Function getKeyAttrId
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static getKeyAttrId(key, idAttr) {
const idValue = key[idAttr.id]
let value = null
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
else {
chars[indexKeyName] = this.ATTRS.ids[index].idUndefined ?
this.ATTRS.ids[index].idUndefined :
this.ATTRS.idUndefined
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function get
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static async get(key, params) {
try {
let cacheObject = await this
.getCache(key, params)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
.forEach((indexKeyName, index) => {
chars[indexKeyName] = this.ATTRS.ids[index].idUndefined ?
this.ATTRS.ids[index].idUndefined :
this.ATTRS.idUndefined
})
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76