Sign upLogin

coryodaniel/regulator

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 10 of 10 total issues

Method find has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def find
      if object.nil?
        nil
      elsif controller.respond_to?(:policy_class)
        controller.policy_class
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/regulator/policy_finder.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method find has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def find
      if object.nil?
        nil
      elsif controller.respond_to?(:policy_class)
        controller.policy_class
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/regulator/policy_finder.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Method initialize has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def initialize(object, controller_or_namespace = nil)
      @object = object

      if controller_or_namespace.instance_of? Module
        # Its a Module
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/regulator/policy_finder.rb - About 55 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method format_action has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def format_action(action, subject)
      # https://github.com/elabs/regulator/blob/master/lib/generators/regulator/install/templates/application_policy.rb
      case action
      when ActiveAdmin::Auth::CREATE  then :create?
      when ActiveAdmin::Auth::UPDATE  then :update?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/regulator/active_admin_adapter.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method format_action has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def format_action(action, subject)
      # https://github.com/elabs/regulator/blob/master/lib/generators/regulator/install/templates/application_policy.rb
      case action
      when Auth::CREATE  then :create?
      when Auth::UPDATE  then :update?
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/generators/regulator/adapter/templates/regulator_active_admin_adapter.rb - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            failure_message_when_negated_proc = lambda do |policy|
          was_were = @violating_permissions.count > 1 ? "were" : "was"
          "Expected #{policy} not to grant #{permissions.to_sentence} on #{record} but #{@violating_permissions.to_sentence} #{was_were} granted"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/regulator/rspec.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
    lib/regulator/rspec.rb on lines 19..21

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 31.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            failure_message_proc = lambda do |policy|
          was_were = @violating_permissions.count > 1 ? "were" : "was"
          "Expected #{policy} to grant #{permissions.to_sentence} on #{record} but #{@violating_permissions.to_sentence} #{was_were} not granted"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/regulator/rspec.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
    lib/regulator/rspec.rb on lines 24..26

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 31.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Method retrieve_policy has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def retrieve_policy(subject)
      case subject
      when nil   then Regulator.policy!(user, resource, regulator_policy_namespace)
      when Class then Regulator.policy!(user, subject.new, regulator_policy_namespace)
      else Regulator.policy!(user, subject, regulator_policy_namespace)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/generators/regulator/adapter/templates/regulator_active_admin_adapter.rb - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      module Generators
    class PolicyGenerator < ::Rails::Generators::NamedBase
      source_root File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'templates'))

      def create_policy_test
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/generators/test_unit/policy_generator.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
    lib/generators/rspec/policy_generator.rb on lines 2..7

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 26.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      module Generators
    class PolicyGenerator < ::Rails::Generators::NamedBase
      source_root File.expand_path(File.join(File.dirname(__FILE__), 'templates'))

      def create_policy_spec
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/generators/rspec/policy_generator.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
    lib/generators/test_unit/policy_generator.rb on lines 2..7

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 26.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Severity
    Category
    Status
    Source
    Language