Showing 684 of 684 total issues
Function bind
has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
bind() {
super.bind();
if (typeof this.timedenomfixed === 'string') this.timedenomfixed = parseInt(this.timedenomfixed,10);
if (typeof this.timedenom === 'string') {
Function addAnnotationRule
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.addAnnotationRule = function() {
if (Dygraph.addedAnnotationCSS) return;
var rule = "border: 1px solid black; " +
"background-color: white; " +
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function numDateTicks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.numDateTicks = function(start_time, end_time, granularity) {
if (granularity < Dygraph.MONTHLY) {
// Generate one tick mark for every fixed interval of time.
var spacing = Dygraph.SHORT_SPACINGS[granularity];
return Math.floor(0.5 + 1.0 * (end_time - start_time) / spacing);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function attr_
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.attr_ = function(name, seriesName) {
var sources = [];
sources.push(this.attrs_);
if (this.user_attrs_) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function computePlotArea_
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype.computePlotArea_ = function() {
var area = {
// TODO(danvk): per-axis setting.
x: 0,
y: 0
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function dateParser
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.dateParser = function(dateStr) {
var dateStrSlashed;
var d;
// Let the system try the format first, with one caveat:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _dashedLine
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphCanvasRenderer.prototype._dashedLine = function(ctx, x, y, x2, y2, pattern) {
// Original version http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4576724/dotted-stroke-in-canvas
// Modified by Russell Valentine to keep line history and continue the pattern
// where it left off.
var dx, dy, len, rot, patternIndex, segment;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function deregisterInputs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
deregisterInputs() {
console.warn('deregistering inputs');//do removeListeners()
window.animateranges = [];
if (this.inputs) {
let inputparts = this.inputs.split(';');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setInputVariables
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setInputVariables() {
for (let key in this.changeinputs) {
let myinputs = this.changeinputs[key];
//console.log('changing inputs', myinputs);
//set real - reference is in - one input one reference
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function constructor
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor() {
super();
this.handleValueChange = e => {
//sets data to dataset
//apply value convert among all data
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _evaluateLineCharts
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype._evaluateLineCharts = function() {
// An array to keep track of how many points will be drawn for each set.
// This will allow for the canvas renderer to not have to check every point
// for every data set since the points are added in order of the sets in
// datasets.
Function doAnimatedZoom
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.doAnimatedZoom = function(oldXRange, newXRange, oldYRanges, newYRanges, callback) {
var steps = this.attr_("animatedZooms") ? Dygraph.ANIMATION_STEPS : 1;
var windows = [];
var valueRanges = [];
Function getScript
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getScript(source, callback) {
//check whether the script is not already there
if (Array.from(document.getElementsByTagName('script')).filter(x=> x.getAttribute('src') === source).length > 0) {
console.warn('AnimateAdobe.getScript() WARNING, script is already added into DOM:', source);
//do callback?
Function bind
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
bind() {
super.bind();
console.log('chartjs xy point bind()');
if (this.xmin) {
//sets yscale min
Function getScript
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getScript(source, callback) {
//check whether the script is not already there
if (Array.from(document.getElementsByTagName('script')).filter(x=> x.getAttribute('src') === source).length > 0) {
console.warn('AnimateAdobe.getScript() WARNING, script is already added into DOM:', source);
//do callback?
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 36:
hex =
(_b = /^([0-9a-f]{8})-([0-9a-f]{4})-([0-9a-f]{4})-([0-9a-f]{4})-([0-9a-f]{12})$/i
.exec(uuid)) === null || _b === void 0 ? void 0 : _b.slice(1, 6).join("");
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 38:
hex =
(_c = /^\{([0-9a-f]{8})-([0-9a-f]{4})-([0-9a-f]{4})-([0-9a-f]{4})-([0-9a-f]{12})\}$/i
.exec(uuid)) === null || _c === void 0 ? void 0 : _c.slice(1, 6).join("");
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (let i = this.refindex; i < this.refindex + this.refvalues; i++) {
if (this.operation) {
datapoint.push(this.operation[opindex](edata[i]));
opindex++;
} else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
case 45:
hex =
(_d = /^urn:uuid:([0-9a-f]{8})-([0-9a-f]{4})-([0-9a-f]{4})-([0-9a-f]{4})-([0-9a-f]{12})$/i
.exec(uuid)) === null || _d === void 0 ? void 0 : _d.slice(1, 6).join("");
break;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (let myindex of this.refindices) {
if (this.operation) {
datapoint.push(this.operation[opindex](edata[myindex]));
opindex++;
} else
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 63.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76