Showing 684 of 684 total issues
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.stepSize = this.fmuspeed * ((typeof(this.fstepsize) === 'string' ) ? parseFloat(this.fstepsize) : this.fstepsize);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.stepSize = this.fmuspeed * ((typeof(this.fstepsize) === 'string' ) ? parseFloat(this.fstepsize) : this.fstepsize);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (document.getElementById(this.fromid)) {
document.getElementById(this.fromid).removeEventListener('animatedata', this.handleValueChange);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var name in labelStyle) {
if (labelStyle.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
div.style[name] = labelStyle[name];
}
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (axisopts.xAxes) axisopts.xAxes[0].display = false;
else axisopts.xAxes = [{display:false }];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (axisopts.yAxes) axisopts.yAxes[0].display = false;
else axisopts.yAxes = [{display:false }];- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.autofmax) {
if (x>this.fmax) {
this.fmax= x;
this.updateK();
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (var name in annotationStyle) {
if (annotationStyle.hasOwnProperty(name)) {
div.style[name] = annotationStyle[name];
}
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.stepSize = this.fmuspeed * ((typeof(this.fstepsize) === 'string' ) ? parseFloat(this.fstepsize) : this.fstepsize);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.stepSize = this.fmuspeed * ((typeof(this.fstepsize) === 'string' ) ? parseFloat(this.fstepsize) : this.fstepsize);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.autofmin) {
if (x<this.fmin) {
this.fmin=x;
this.updateK();
} - Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
this.stepSize = this.fmuspeed * ((typeof(this.fstepsize) === 'string' ) ? parseFloat(this.fstepsize) : this.fstepsize);- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function bind has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
bind() {
console.log('watchhash check au controller');
if (this.element && this.element.au && this.element.au.controller) {
console.log('watchhash check au controller type:', typeof (this.element.au.controller));
if (typeof (this.element.au.controller) === 'object') console.log('watchhash check au controller viewmodel:', this.element.au.controller.viewModel);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function isValidPoint has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.isValidPoint = function(p, allowNaNY) {
if (!p) return false; // null or undefined object
if (p.yval === null) return false; // missing point
if (p.x === null || p.x === undefined) return false;
if (p.y === null || p.y === undefined) return false;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function V has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Date.ext={};Date.ext.util={};Date.ext.util.xPad=function(x,pad,r){if(typeof (r)=="undefined"){r=10}for(;parseInt(x,10)<r&&r>1;r/=10){x=pad.toString()+x}return x.toString()};Date.prototype.locale="en-GB";if(document.getElementsByTagName("html")&&document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].lang){Date.prototype.locale=document.getElementsByTagName("html")[0].lang}Date.ext.locales={};Date.ext.locales.en={a:["Sun","Mon","Tue","Wed","Thu","Fri","Sat"],A:["Sunday","Monday","Tuesday","Wednesday","Thursday","Friday","Saturday"],b:["Jan","Feb","Mar","Apr","May","Jun","Jul","Aug","Sep","Oct","Nov","Dec"],B:["January","February","March","April","May","June","July","August","September","October","November","December"],c:"%a %d %b %Y %T %Z",p:["AM","PM"],P:["am","pm"],x:"%d/%m/%y",X:"%T"};Date.ext.locales["en-US"]=Date.ext.locales.en;Date.ext.locales["en-US"].c="%a %d %b %Y %r %Z";Date.ext.locales["en-US"].x="%D";Date.ext.locales["en-US"].X="%r";Date.ext.locales["en-GB"]=Date.ext.locales.en;Date.ext.locales["en-AU"]=Date.ext.locales["en-GB"];Date.ext.formats={a:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].a[d.getDay()]},A:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].A[d.getDay()]},b:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].b[d.getMonth()]},B:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].B[d.getMonth()]},c:"toLocaleString",C:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(d.getFullYear()/100,10),0)},d:["getDate","0"],e:["getDate"," "],g:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(Date.ext.util.G(d)/100,10),0)},G:function(d){var y=d.getFullYear();var V=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.V(d),10);var W=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.W(d),10);if(W>V){y++}else{if(W===0&&V>=52){y--}}return y},H:["getHours","0"],I:function(d){var I=d.getHours()%12;return Date.ext.util.xPad(I===0?12:I,0)},j:function(d){var ms=d-new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/1/1 GMT");ms+=d.getTimezoneOffset()*60000;var doy=parseInt(ms/60000/60/24,10)+1;return Date.ext.util.xPad(doy,0,100)},m:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d.getMonth()+1,0)},M:["getMinutes","0"],p:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].p[d.getHours()>=12?1:0]},P:function(d){return Date.ext.locales[d.locale].P[d.getHours()>=12?1:0]},S:["getSeconds","0"],u:function(d){var dow=d.getDay();return dow===0?7:dow},U:function(d){var doy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.j(d),10);var rdow=6-d.getDay();var woy=parseInt((doy+rdow)/7,10);return Date.ext.util.xPad(woy,0)},V:function(d){var woy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.W(d),10);var dow1_1=(new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/1/1")).getDay();var idow=woy+(dow1_1>4||dow1_1<=1?0:1);if(idow==53&&(new Date(""+d.getFullYear()+"/12/31")).getDay()<4){idow=1}else{if(idow===0){idow=Date.ext.formats.V(new Date(""+(d.getFullYear()-1)+"/12/31"))}}return Date.ext.util.xPad(idow,0)},w:"getDay",W:function(d){var doy=parseInt(Date.ext.formats.j(d),10);var rdow=7-Date.ext.formats.u(d);var woy=parseInt((doy+rdow)/7,10);return Date.ext.util.xPad(woy,0,10)},y:function(d){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d.getFullYear()%100,0)},Y:"getFullYear",z:function(d){var o=d.getTimezoneOffset();var H=Date.ext.util.xPad(parseInt(Math.abs(o/60),10),0);var M=Date.ext.util.xPad(o%60,0);return(o>0?"-":"+")+H+M},Z:function(d){return d.toString().replace(/^.*\(([^)]+)\)$/,"$1")},"%":function(d){return"%"}};Date.ext.aggregates={c:"locale",D:"%m/%d/%y",h:"%b",n:"\n",r:"%I:%M:%S %p",R:"%H:%M",t:"\t",T:"%H:%M:%S",x:"locale",X:"locale"};Date.ext.aggregates.z=Date.ext.formats.z(new Date());Date.ext.aggregates.Z=Date.ext.formats.Z(new Date());Date.ext.unsupported={};Date.prototype.strftime=function(fmt){if(!(this.locale in Date.ext.locales)){if(this.locale.replace(/-[a-zA-Z]+$/,"") in Date.ext.locales){this.locale=this.locale.replace(/-[a-zA-Z]+$/,"")}else{this.locale="en-GB"}}var d=this;while(fmt.match(/%[cDhnrRtTxXzZ]/)){fmt=fmt.replace(/%([cDhnrRtTxXzZ])/g,function(m0,m1){var f=Date.ext.aggregates[m1];return(f=="locale"?Date.ext.locales[d.locale][m1]:f)})}var str=fmt.replace(/%([aAbBCdegGHIjmMpPSuUVwWyY%])/g,function(m0,m1){var f=Date.ext.formats[m1];if(typeof (f)=="string"){return d[f]()}else{if(typeof (f)=="function"){return f.call(d,d)}else{if(typeof (f)=="object"&&typeof (f[0])=="string"){return Date.ext.util.xPad(d[f[0]](),f[1])}else{return m1}}}});d=null;return str};- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function constructor has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
constructor(element, ea) {
//super();
this.element = element;
this.isReadMDCustomElement = false;
console.log('watchhash check au controller');- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function update has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.update = function (self, o) {
if (typeof(o) != 'undefined' && o !== null) {
for (var k in o) {
if (o.hasOwnProperty(k)) {
self[k] = o[k];- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function unstackPointAtIndex has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
DygraphLayout.prototype.unstackPointAtIndex = function(idx) {
var point = this.points[idx];
// If the point is missing, no unstacking is necessary
if (!point.yval) {
return point;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function drawGraph_ has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Dygraph.prototype.drawGraph_ = function() {
var start = new Date();
// This is used to set the second parameter to drawCallback, below.
var is_initial_draw = this.is_initial_draw_;- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setDefaultAnswer has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setDefaultAnswer(qid2) {
let qid = qid2;
if (qid2.includes(';')) qid = qid2.split(';')[0]; //first is id second is id of related tabs
if (this.quizids.includes(qid2)) {
// Check if an item with id 'id2' exists- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"