Showing 6,062 of 6,062 total issues
Function ajax
has 240 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
ajax: function( url, options ) {
// If url is an object, simulate pre-1.5 signature
if ( typeof url === "object" ) {
options = url;
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method nodes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 61 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def nodes
if params[:component]
component = params[:component]
upgrade_status = ::Crowbar::UpgradeStatus.new
substep = upgrade_status.current_substep
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File nodes_controller.rb
has 545 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class NodesController < ApplicationController
# allow node polling during the upgrade
skip_before_filter :upgrade, only: [:index]
api :GET, "/nodes", "List all nodes and their status"
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method services
has a Cognitive Complexity of 57 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def services
return unless cluster_health_check
return unless check_schema_migrations
return unless check_product_version
begin
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function setDocument
has 218 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
setDocument = Sizzle.setDocument = function( node ) {
var hasCompare, parent,
doc = node ? node.ownerDocument || node : preferredDoc;
// If no document and documentElement is available, return
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method provided_with_enabled
has a Cognitive Complexity of 55 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def provided_with_enabled(feature,
platform = nil,
arch = nil,
check_enabled = true,
ignore_cloud = false,
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File nodes_helper.rb
has 523 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module NodesHelper
def all_non_admin_nodes
Node.find("NOT admin_node:true")
end
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method checks
has a Cognitive Complexity of 54 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def checks
upgrade_status = ::Crowbar::UpgradeStatus.new
upgrade_status.start_step(:prechecks)
{}.tap do |ret|
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File setup_base_images.rb
has 511 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
dirty = false
# Set up the OS images as well
# Common to all OSes
admin_net = Barclamp::Inventory.get_network_by_type(node, "admin")
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method allocate_ip_by_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 52 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def allocate_ip_by_type(bc_instance, network, range, object, type, suggestion = nil)
Rails.logger.debug("Network allocate ip for #{type}: entering #{object} #{network} #{range}")
return [404, "No network specified"] if network.nil?
return [404, "No range specified"] if range.nil?
return [404, "No object specified"] if object.nil?
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File tooltip.js
has 497 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/* ========================================================================
* Bootstrap: tooltip.js v3.4.1
* https://getbootstrap.com/docs/3.4/javascript/#tooltip
* Inspired by the original jQuery.tipsy by Jason Frame
* ========================================================================
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method transition
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def transition(inst, name, state)
Rails.logger.debug("Deployer transition: entering: #{name} for #{state}")
# discovering because mandatory for discovery image
if ["discovering", "readying"].include? state
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _create
has 197 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
_create: function() {
// Some browsers only repeat keydown events, not keypress events,
// so we use the suppressKeyPress flag to determine if we've already
// handled the keydown event. #7269
// Unfortunately the code for & in keypress is the same as the up arrow,
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$.ui.plugin.add("draggable", "zIndex", {
start: function(event, ui) {
var t = $(ui.helper), o = $(this).data("ui-draggable").options;
if(t.css("zIndex")) {
o._zIndex = t.css("zIndex");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 190.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(!o.axis || o.axis !== "x") {
if((i.overflowOffset.top + i.scrollParent[0].offsetHeight) - event.pageY < o.scrollSensitivity) {
i.scrollParent[0].scrollTop = scrolled = i.scrollParent[0].scrollTop + o.scrollSpeed;
} else if(event.pageY - i.overflowOffset.top < o.scrollSensitivity) {
i.scrollParent[0].scrollTop = scrolled = i.scrollParent[0].scrollTop - o.scrollSpeed;
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 190.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(!o.axis || o.axis !== "y") {
if((i.overflowOffset.left + i.scrollParent[0].offsetWidth) - event.pageX < o.scrollSensitivity) {
i.scrollParent[0].scrollLeft = scrolled = i.scrollParent[0].scrollLeft + o.scrollSpeed;
} else if(event.pageX - i.overflowOffset.left < o.scrollSensitivity) {
i.scrollParent[0].scrollLeft = scrolled = i.scrollParent[0].scrollLeft - o.scrollSpeed;
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 190.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
$.ui.plugin.add("draggable", "opacity", {
start: function(event, ui) {
var t = $(ui.helper), o = $(this).data("ui-draggable").options;
if(t.css("opacity")) {
o._opacity = t.css("opacity");
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 190.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(!o.axis || o.axis !== "y") {
if(event.pageX - $(document).scrollLeft() < o.scrollSensitivity) {
scrolled = $(document).scrollLeft($(document).scrollLeft() - o.scrollSpeed);
} else if($(window).width() - (event.pageX - $(document).scrollLeft()) < o.scrollSensitivity) {
scrolled = $(document).scrollLeft($(document).scrollLeft() + o.scrollSpeed);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 185.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(!o.axis || o.axis !== "x") {
if(event.pageY - $(document).scrollTop() < o.scrollSensitivity) {
scrolled = $(document).scrollTop($(document).scrollTop() - o.scrollSpeed);
} else if($(window).height() - (event.pageY - $(document).scrollTop()) < o.scrollSensitivity) {
scrolled = $(document).scrollTop($(document).scrollTop() + o.scrollSpeed);
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 185.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method transition
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def transition(inst, name, state)
Rails.logger.debug("Network transition: entering: #{name} for #{state}")
# we need one state before "installed" (and after allocation) because we
# need the node to have the admin network fully defined for
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"