Method apply_role_pre_chef_call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def apply_role_pre_chef_call(old_role, role, all_nodes)
@logger.debug("Database apply_role_pre_chef_call: entering #{all_nodes.inspect}")
return if all_nodes.empty?
database_elements, database_nodes, database_ha_enabled = role_expand_elements(role, "database-server")
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_ha_attributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 24 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_ha_attributes(attributes, cluster)
storage_mode = attributes["ha"]["storage"]["mode"]
role = available_clusters[cluster]
case attributes["sql_engine"]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method apply_role_pre_chef_call
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def apply_role_pre_chef_call(old_role, role, all_nodes)
@logger.debug("Database apply_role_pre_chef_call: entering #{all_nodes.inspect}")
return if all_nodes.empty?
database_elements, database_nodes, database_ha_enabled = role_expand_elements(role, "database-server")
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method validate_ha_attributes
has 46 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_ha_attributes(attributes, cluster)
storage_mode = attributes["ha"]["storage"]["mode"]
role = available_clusters[cluster]
case attributes["sql_engine"]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method validate_proposal_after_save
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_proposal_after_save(proposal)
validate_one_for_role proposal, "database-server"
attributes = proposal["attributes"][@bc_name]
deployment = proposal["deployment"][@bc_name]
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Method validate_proposal_after_save
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_proposal_after_save(proposal)
validate_one_for_role proposal, "database-server"
attributes = proposal["attributes"][@bc_name]
deployment = proposal["deployment"][@bc_name]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if attributes["ha"]["storage"]["shared"]["device"].blank?
validation_error I18n.t(
"barclamp.#{@bc_name}.validation.no_device"
)
end
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 37.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 5 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if nodes.size >= 1
controller = nodes.find { |n| n.intended_role == "controller" } || nodes.first
base["deployment"]["database"]["elements"] = {
"database-server" => [controller[:fqdn]]
- Read upRead up
- Create a ticketCreate a ticket
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 31.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76