Showing 42 of 95 total issues
Method feature_available? has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def feature_available?(feature)
return false if feature.blank?
return false if feature == :create_another && !feature_available?(:create)
return false if feature == :search && !feature_available?(:index)
features.include? feature- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method merge! has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
def merge!(var_name, hash_value)
raise ArgumentError unless hash_value.is_a?(Hash)
old_value = self[var_name] || {}
raise TypeError, "Existing value is not a hash, can't merge!" unless old_value.is_a?(Hash)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"