Showing 366 of 366 total issues
File mathquill.js
has 3762 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* MathQuill: http://mathquill.com
* by Jay and Han (laughinghan@gmail.com)
*
* This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the
File Chart.js
has 2512 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*!
* Chart.js
* http://chartjs.org/
* Version: 1.0.1-beta.4
*
File display-latex.user.js
has 1766 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
// This script was automatically generated from a literate source.
// Do not edit this file; look at the literate source instead!
//
// Greasemonkey user script to
// Display LaTeX in Web pages by transforming to MathML
File core.js
has 1335 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*jslint browser: true*/
/*global $, define, rangy, _, Detector, WebSyncData, ace, WebSyncAuth, WebSocket, jsonpatch, openpgp, NProgress, fullScreenApi, requirejs, WS*/
/*
WebSync: Core.js
File tables.js
has 848 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*global $, define, rangy, _, JST*/
//= require templates/tables-ribbon
//= require templates/tables-selection
Function v_subexpr_to_mathml
has a Cognitive Complexity of 100 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
function v_subexpr_to_mathml (tokens ) {
var v_result = null ;
var v_mmultiscripts = null ;
var v_mprescripts = null ;
if( ( ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 0 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 0 ]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function matrix
has 292 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
LatexCmds.matrix = P(MathCommand, function(_, super_) {
var MatrixCell = P(MathBlock, function(_, super_) {
_.init = function (column, row) {
this.column = column;
Function onmessage
has 229 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
onmessage: function(e) {
var data = JSON.parse(e.data);
console.log('MESSAGE', data);
var events = WS.registeredMessageEvents[data.type];
if (!_.isEmpty(events)) {
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while( ( ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 0 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 0 ]
== "{" ) && ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 1 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 1 ]
== "}" ) && ( ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 2 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 2 ]
== "_" ) || ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 2 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 2 ]
== "^" ) ) ) ) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 214.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if( ( ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 0 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 0 ]
== "{" ) && ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 1 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 1 ]
== "}" ) && ( ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 2 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 2 ]
== "_" ) || ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 2 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 2 ]
== "^" ) ) ) ) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 214.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
while( ( ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 0 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 0 ]
== "{" ) && ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 1 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 1 ]
== "}" ) && ( ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 2 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 2 ]
== "_" ) || ( tokens.list[tokens.length<=tokens.index+ 2 ? tokens.length-1 : tokens.index+ 2 ]
== "^" ) ) ) ) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 214.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function Cursor
has 182 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
var Cursor = P(Point, function(_) {
_.init = function(initParent, options) {
this.parent = initParent;
this.options = options;
Function Tween
has a Cognitive Complexity of 46 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
TWEEN.Tween = function(a) {
var c = {}, b = {}, d = {}, e = 1E3,
g = 0,
h = !1,
j = !1,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function parse
has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
parse: function(data, mtllibCallback) {
function vector(x, y, z) {
return new THREE.Vector3(x, y, z);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.options.showTooltips){
helpers.bindEvents(this, this.options.tooltipEvents, function(evt){
var activePoints = (evt.type !== 'mouseout') ? this.getPointsAtEvent(evt) : [];
this.eachPoints(function(point){
point.restore(['fillColor', 'strokeColor']);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 166.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.options.showTooltips){
helpers.bindEvents(this, this.options.tooltipEvents, function(evt){
var activeBars = (evt.type !== 'mouseout') ? this.getBarsAtEvent(evt) : [];
this.eachBars(function(bar){
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 166.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (this.options.showTooltips){
helpers.bindEvents(this, this.options.tooltipEvents, function(evt){
var activePointsCollection = (evt.type !== 'mouseout') ? this.getPointsAtEvent(evt) : [];
this.eachPoints(function(point){
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 166.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
g_tex_commands
has 47 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
= { "\\frac" : v_fraction_to_mathml ,
"\\dfrac" : v_fraction_to_mathml ,
"\\tfrac" : v_fraction_to_mathml ,
"\\binom" : v_binom_to_mathml ,
"\\sqrt" : v_sqrt_to_mathml ,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var scaleSizes = (this.options.scaleOverride) ?
{
steps: this.options.scaleSteps,
stepValue: this.options.scaleStepWidth,
min: this.options.scaleStartValue,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 165.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
var scaleSizes = (this.options.scaleOverride) ?
{
steps: this.options.scaleSteps,
stepValue: this.options.scaleStepWidth,
min: this.options.scaleStartValue,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 165.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76