Showing 356 of 356 total issues
Endpoint
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@JsonAutoDetect(fieldVisibility = Visibility.ANY)
@JsonPropertyOrder({ "endpoint", "httpMethod", "baseUrl", "relativeUrl" })
public class Endpoint implements Comparable<Endpoint> {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(Endpoint.class);
private QueryString queryString;
Method getField
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private Optional<Field> getField(Class<?> clazz, PropertyDescriptor p) {
Optional<Field> res = Optional.empty();
if (clazz != null) {
try {
res = Optional.ofNullable(clazz.getDeclaredField(p.getName()));
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method addEndpoint
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void addEndpoint(Endpoint e) {
LOGGER.debug("Añadiendo endpoint: {}", e);
String[] relatives = e.getUrl().trim().split("/");
int i = 0;
String path = "";
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getResponseSchemma
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static Optional<JsonSchema> getResponseSchemma(Method m, Class<?> parametrizedClass) {
Optional<JsonSchema> schemma = Optional.empty();
// obtengo el tipo real de retorno por si es generic
Optional<Type> returnType = ReflectionUtils.getRealType(m.getGenericReturnType(), parametrizedClass);
if (returnType.isPresent()) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method checkIfAddField
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private boolean checkIfAddField(Optional<Field> field, PropertyDescriptor propertyDescriptor, boolean isRequest) {
boolean res = true;
if (field.isPresent()) {
res = !field.get().isAnnotationPresent(JsonIgnore.class);
if (isRequest) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getCreationStrategy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static DetailFieldStrategy getCreationStrategy(Type type, Optional<Class<?>> parametrizedClass) {
DetailFieldStrategy strategy = null;
if (type != null) {
LOGGER.debug("seleccionando strategyField: {}", type.getTypeName());
if (ParameterizedType.class.isAssignableFrom(type.getClass())
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method collectParameters
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void collectParameters(Collection<Parameters> parameters, Parameter parameter, Annotation a,
boolean isPathVariable) {
if (a != null) {
String typeStr = parameter.getType().getSimpleName();
Type type = parameter.getParameterizedType();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static List<Parameters> getPathVariable(Method m) {
List<Parameters> parameters = new ArrayList<>();
Arrays.asList(m.getParameters()).forEach(parameter -> {
PathVariable a = parameter.getAnnotation(PathVariable.class);
collectParameters(parameters, parameter, a, true);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static List<Parameters> getQueryString(Method m) {
List<Parameters> parameters = new ArrayList<>();
Arrays.asList(m.getParameters()).forEach(parameter -> {
RequestParam a = parameter.getAnnotation(RequestParam.class);
collectParameters(parameters, parameter, a, false);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method getName
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private String getName(PropertyDescriptor field, Optional<Field> optField, boolean isRequest) {
String name = field.getName();
if (optField.isPresent()) {
JsonProperty property = optField.get().getAnnotation(JsonProperty.class);
if (property != null) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void addQueryParameters(String name, QueryParameterRaml parameter) {
if (queryParameters == null)
queryParameters = new HashMap<>();
if (!queryParameters.containsKey(name)) {
queryParameters.put(name, new ArrayList<>());
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public void add(String key, Object value) {
if (resource == null)
resource = new HashMap<>();
if (!resource.containsKey(key)) {
resource.put(key, new ArrayList<>());
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 55.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method getRequestSchemma
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static Optional<JsonSchema> getRequestSchemma(Method m, Class<?> controller) {
List<Parameter> p = ReflectionUtils.getParametersBody(m);
Optional<JsonSchema> schemma = Optional.empty();
if (!p.isEmpty()) {
Optional<Type> t = ReflectionUtils.getRealType(p.get(0).getParameterizedType(), controller);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getClass
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static Optional<Class<?>> getClass(Type type) {
Optional<Class<?>> clazz = Optional.empty();
if (type != null) {
if (type instanceof Class) {
clazz = Optional.of((Class<?>) type);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public Raml(String title, String baseUri, String version) {
super();
this.title = title;
this.baseUri = baseUri;
this.version = version;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public Parameters(boolean required, String name, String type) {
super();
this.type = type;
this.required = required;
this.name = name;
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method createDetail
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected Optional<DetailField> createDetail(PropertyDescriptor descriptor, Optional<Field> f, boolean isRequest) {
Optional<DetailField> detailField;
LOGGER.debug("creando property: {}, field: {}, isRequest: {}", descriptor, f, isRequest);
if (isRequest) {
Optional<List<Validator>> validators = ValidatorFactory.getValidations(descriptor, f);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getGenericParameterStrategy
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static DetailFieldStrategy getGenericParameterStrategy(Type type, Optional<Class<?>> parametrizableClass) {
DetailFieldStrategy strategy = null;
// es un tipo generico y tengo que obtener la info de la clasex
Optional<Type> genericType = Optional.empty();
if (parametrizableClass.isPresent())
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getValidator
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static Optional<Validator> getValidator(Annotation annotation) {
Validator validator = null;
if (isValidable(annotation)) {
if (annotation instanceof Range || annotation instanceof Length) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Wrong lexicographical order for 'com.fasterxml.jackson.module.jsonSchema.JsonSchema' import. Should be before 'org.slf4j.LoggerFactory'. Open
import com.fasterxml.jackson.module.jsonSchema.JsonSchema;
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks that the groups of import declarations appear in the order specifiedby the user. If there is an import but its group is not specified in theconfiguration such an import should be placed at the end of the import list.
This documentation is written and maintained by the Checkstyle community and is covered under the same license as the Checkstyle project.