Method parse_specification has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_specification param
@parsed||=[]
begin
if File.exist?(param)
txt=File.read(param)- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method extension_handling has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extension_handling spec
#change into the directory the spec is in to handle relative paths correctly
Dir.chdir(File.dirname(File.expand_path(spec.filename))) do |path|
spec.scenario.steps.each do |step|
#do we have a method to handle the element?- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validate_case has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def validate_case xmldoc
raise Rutema::ParserError,"missing #{ELEM_SPEC} element in #{xmldoc}" unless xmldoc.elements[ELEM_SPEC]
raise Rutema::ParserError,"missing #{ELEM_DESC} element in #{xmldoc}" unless xmldoc.elements[ELEM_DESC]
raise Rutema::ParserError,"missing #{ELEM_TITLE} element in #{xmldoc}" unless xmldoc.elements[ELEM_TITLE]
end- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method parse_case has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def parse_case xmltxt,filename
spec=Rutema::Specification.new({})
xmldoc=REXML::Document.new( xmltxt )
validate_case(xmldoc)
xmldoc.root.attributes.each do |attr,value|- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"