datacite/lupo

View on GitHub
app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb

Summary

Maintainability
F
6 days
Test Coverage
F
8%

Method index has 367 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def index
    sort =
      case params[:sort]
      when "name"
        { "doi" => { order: "asc" } }
Severity: Major
Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 1 day to fix

    File datacite_dois_controller.rb has 708 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    require "uri"
    require "base64"
    require "pp"
    
    class DataciteDoisController < ApplicationController
    Severity: Major
    Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 1 day to fix

      Method index has a Cognitive Complexity of 62 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def index
          sort =
            case params[:sort]
            when "name"
              { "doi" => { order: "asc" } }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 1 day to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method show has 61 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

        def show
          # only show findable DataCite DOIs to anonymous users and role user
          # use current_user role to determine permissions to access draft and registered dois
          # instead of using ability
          # response = DataciteDoi.find_by_id(params[:id])
      Severity: Major
      Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

        Method update has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def update
            @doi = DataciteDoi.where(doi: params[:id]).first
            exists = @doi.present?
        
            # capture username and password for reuse in the handle system
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method get_url has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def get_url
            @doi = DataciteDoi.where(doi: params[:id]).first
            fail ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound if @doi.blank?
        
            authorize! :get_url, @doi
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method update has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

          def update
            @doi = DataciteDoi.where(doi: params[:id]).first
            exists = @doi.present?
        
            # capture username and password for reuse in the handle system
        Severity: Minor
        Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

          Method get_url has 37 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

            def get_url
              @doi = DataciteDoi.where(doi: params[:id]).first
              fail ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound if @doi.blank?
          
              authorize! :get_url, @doi
          Severity: Minor
          Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

            Method safe_params has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                def safe_params
                  if params[:data].blank?
                    fail JSON::ParserError,
                         "You need to provide a payload following the JSONAPI spec"
                  end
            Severity: Minor
            Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 1 hr to fix

              Method show has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                def show
                  # only show findable DataCite DOIs to anonymous users and role user
                  # use current_user role to determine permissions to access draft and registered dois
                  # instead of using ability
                  # response = DataciteDoi.find_by_id(params[:id])
              Severity: Minor
              Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 55 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method destroy has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                def destroy
                  @doi = DataciteDoi.where(doi: params[:id]).first
                  fail ActiveRecord::RecordNotFound if @doi.blank?
              
                  authorize! :destroy, @doi
              Severity: Minor
              Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                      options[:links] = {
                        self: request.original_url,
                        next:
                          if results.size < page[:size] || page[:size] == 0
                            nil
              Severity: Major
              Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb and 2 other locations - About 50 mins to fix
              app/controllers/events_controller.rb on lines 166..179
              app/controllers/old_events_controller.rb on lines 154..167

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 42.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  rescue Elasticsearch::Transport::Transport::Errors::BadRequest => e
                    message =
                      JSON.parse(e.message[6..-1]).to_h.dig(
                        "error",
                        "root_cause",
              Severity: Minor
              Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
              app/controllers/works_controller.rb on lines 143..154

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 33.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  def set_include
                    if params[:include].present?
                      @include =
                        params[:include].split(",").map { |i| i.downcase.underscore.to_sym }
                      @include = @include & %i[client media]
              Severity: Minor
              Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb and 3 other locations - About 25 mins to fix
              app/controllers/clients_controller.rb on lines 277..283
              app/controllers/events_controller.rb on lines 305..311
              app/controllers/old_events_controller.rb on lines 300..306

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 29.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                      if fields
                        render(
                          json: DataciteDoiSerializer.new(results, options.merge(fields: fields)).serializable_hash.to_json,
                          status: :ok
                        )
              Severity: Minor
              Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
              app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb on lines 351..360

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 28.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                          if fields
                            render(
                              json: DataciteDoiSerializer.new(results, options.merge(fields: fields)).serializable_hash.to_json,
                              status: :ok
                            )
              Severity: Minor
              Found in app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb and 1 other location - About 20 mins to fix
              app/controllers/datacite_dois_controller.rb on lines 205..214

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 28.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              There are no issues that match your filters.

              Category
              Status