Showing 19 of 19 total issues
Class Work
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Work
include OrcidClient::Base
include OrcidClient::Author
include OrcidClient::Date
include OrcidClient::WorkType
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def create_external_identifier(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "ORCID access token missing" }] }) unless orcid_token.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def create_work(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "ORCID access token missing" }] }) unless orcid_token.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def create_notification(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Notification access token missing" }] }) unless notification_access_token.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 72.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_external_identifier(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "ORCID access token missing" }] }) unless orcid_token.present?
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Put code missing" }] }) unless put_code.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_work(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "ORCID access token missing" }] }) unless orcid_token.present?
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Put code missing" }] }) unless put_code.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def get_notification(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Notification access token missing" }] }) unless notification_access_token.present?
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Put code missing" }] }) unless put_code.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_notification(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Notification access token missing" }] }) unless notification_access_token.present?
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Put code missing" }] }) unless put_code.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 60.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method orcid_work_type
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def orcid_work_type(internal_work_type, internal_work_subtype)
type = case internal_work_type
when 'Text'
case internal_work_subtype
when /^(Article|Articles|Journal Article|JournalArticle)$/i
Method update_work
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def update_work(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "ORCID access token missing" }] }) unless orcid_token.present?
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Put code missing" }] }) unless put_code.present?
self.visibility = nil
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_work
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_work(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "ORCID access token missing" }] }) unless orcid_token.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method insert_pub_date
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def insert_pub_date(xml)
if publication_date['year']
xml.send(:'common:publication-date') do
xml.year(publication_date.fetch('year'))
xml.month(publication_date.fetch('month', nil)) if publication_date['month']
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_external_identifier
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_external_identifier(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "ORCID access token missing" }] }) unless orcid_token.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method create_notification
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_notification(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Notification access token missing" }] }) unless notification_access_token.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method delete_notification
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_notification(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Notification access token missing" }] }) unless notification_access_token.present?
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Put code missing" }] }) unless put_code.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_notification
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_notification(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Notification access token missing" }] }) unless notification_access_token.present?
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Put code missing" }] }) unless put_code.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method delete_work
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_work(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "ORCID access token missing" }] }) unless orcid_token.present?
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Put code missing" }] }) unless put_code.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method orcid_work_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def orcid_work_type(internal_work_type, internal_work_subtype)
type = case internal_work_type
when 'Text'
case internal_work_subtype
when /^(Article|Articles|Journal Article|JournalArticle)$/i
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method delete_external_identifier
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def delete_external_identifier(options={})
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "ORCID access token missing" }] }) unless orcid_token.present?
return OpenStruct.new(body: { "errors" => [{ "title" => "Put code missing" }] }) unless put_code.present?
orcid_api_url = options[:sandbox] ? 'https://api.sandbox.orcid.org' : 'https://api.orcid.org'
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"