Showing 14 of 14 total issues
File storage.py
has 270 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
# coding=utf-8
"""Github Storage Backend implementation
This backend stores datasets as GitHub repositories, utilizing Git's built-in
revisions and tags. This implementation is based on GitHub's Web API, and will
File filesystem.py
has 259 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
"""Pyfilesystem based versioned metadata storage
This is useful especially for testing and POC implementations
"""
import hashlib
FilesystemStorage
has 21 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class FilesystemStorage(StorageBackend):
"""Abstract filesystem based storage based on PyFilesystem
This storage backend is useful mostly in testing, especially with the
'mem://' file system. You most likely shouldn't be using it in production,
GitHubStorage
has 21 functions (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class GitHubStorage(StorageBackend):
"""GitHub based metadata storage
"""
DEFAULT_README = ('# ¯\\_(ツ)_/¯\n'
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try:
package_dir = self._fs.makedirs(_get_package_path(package_id))
except DirectoryExists:
raise exc.Conflict("Package with id {} already exists".format(package_id))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
try:
package_dir = self._fs.opendir(_get_package_path(package_id))
except ResourceNotFound:
raise exc.NotFound('Could not find package {}'.format(package_id))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 39.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function _create_lfs_files
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _create_lfs_files(self, datapackage):
# type: (Dict[str, Any]) -> List[gh.InputGitTreeElement]
"""Create LFS pointer files and config files, if we need to
:raise ValueError: If resources with conflicting file names are found
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function create
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create(self, package_id, metadata, author=None, message=None):
owner, repo_name = self._parse_id(package_id)
datapackage = _create_file('datapackage.json', json.dumps(metadata, indent=2))
files = [datapackage] + self._create_lfs_files(metadata)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function _create_tag
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def _create_tag(self, repo, name, description, revision_ref, author):
# type: (gh.Repository, str, str, str, Optional[Author]) -> gh.GitTag.GitTag
"""Low level operations for creating a git tag
"""
author = self._verify_author(author)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function tag_update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def tag_update(self, package_id, tag, author=None, new_name=None, new_description=None):
if new_name is None and new_description is None:
raise ValueError("Expecting at least one of new_name or new_description to be specified")
repo = self._get_repo(package_id)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function fetch
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fetch(self, package_id, revision_ref=None, repo=None):
if repo is None:
repo = self._get_repo(package_id)
try:
if not revision_ref:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Try, Except, Pass detected. Open
except Exception:
- Exclude checks
Use of assert detected. The enclosed code will be removed when compiling to optimised byte code. Open
assert isinstance(ref, str), ref
- Exclude checks
Use of assert detected. The enclosed code will be removed when compiling to optimised byte code. Open
assert ref.object.type == 'commit'
- Exclude checks