Showing 23 of 23 total issues
File builtin_contracts.rb
has 358 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
module Contracts
module Builtin
# Check that an argument is +Numeric+.
class Num
def self.valid?(val)
Class MethodHandler
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class MethodHandler
METHOD_REFERENCE_FACTORY = {
:class_methods => SingletonMethodReference,
:instance_methods => MethodReference
}.freeze
Assignment Branch Condition size for handle is too high. [15.13/15] Open
def handle
return unless engine?
return if decorators.empty?
validate_decorators!
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method execute_on_target
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def execute_on_target(obj, name, method_type, current_engine, *args, &blk)
Method fail_if_invalid
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def fail_if_invalid(validator, arg, arg_pos, args_size, contract)
Method message
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def message
s = []
s << header.to_s
s << " Expected: #{expected}"
s << " Actual: #{data[:arg].inspect}"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Empty line detected around arguments. Open
Contract String => String
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks if empty lines exist around the arguments of a method invocation.
Example:
# bad
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
# good
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
Empty line detected around arguments. Open
#{(matched + [decorator]).map(&:to_s).join("\n")}
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks if empty lines exist around the arguments of a method invocation.
Example:
# bad
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
# good
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
Extra blank line detected. Open
group :test do
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks for two or more consecutive blank lines.
Example:
# bad - It has two empty lines.
some_method
# one empty line
# two empty lines
some_method
# good
some_method
# one empty line
some_method
Empty line detected around arguments. Open
Did you accidentally put more than one contract on a single function, like so?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks if empty lines exist around the arguments of a method invocation.
Example:
# bad
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
# good
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
Do not place comments on the same line as the end
keyword. Open
end # end CallWith
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for comments put on the same line as some keywords.
These keywords are: begin
, class
, def
, end
, module
.
Note that some comments (such as :nodoc:
and rubocop:disable
) are
allowed.
Example:
# bad
if condition
statement
end # end if
# bad
class X # comment
statement
end
# bad
def x; end # comment
# good
if condition
statement
end
# good
class X # :nodoc:
y
end
Empty line detected around arguments. Open
If you did NOT, then you have probably discovered a bug in this library.
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks if empty lines exist around the arguments of a method invocation.
Example:
# bad
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
# good
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
Avoid rescuing without specifying an error class. Open
rescue
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for rescuing StandardError
. There are two supported
styles implicit
and explicit
. This cop will not register an offense
if any error other than StandardError
is specified.
Example: EnforcedStyle: implicit
# `implicit` will enforce using `rescue` instead of
# `rescue StandardError`.
# bad
begin
foo
rescue StandardError
bar
end
# good
begin
foo
rescue
bar
end
# good
begin
foo
rescue OtherError
bar
end
# good
begin
foo
rescue StandardError, SecurityError
bar
end
Example: EnforcedStyle: explicit (default)
# `explicit` will enforce using `rescue StandardError`
# instead of `rescue`.
# bad
begin
foo
rescue
bar
end
# good
begin
foo
rescue StandardError
bar
end
# good
begin
foo
rescue OtherError
bar
end
# good
begin
foo
rescue StandardError, SecurityError
bar
end
Empty line detected around arguments. Open
Each definition needs to have a different contract for the parameters.
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cops checks if empty lines exist around the arguments of a method invocation.
Example:
# bad
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
# good
do_something(
foo
)
process(bar,
baz: qux,
thud: fred)
some_method(
[1,2,3],
x: y
)
Gems should be sorted in an alphabetical order within their section of the Gemfile. Gem codecov
should appear before rspec
. Open
gem "codecov"
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Gems should be alphabetically sorted within groups.
Example:
# bad
gem 'rubocop'
gem 'rspec'
# good
gem 'rspec'
gem 'rubocop'
# good
gem 'rubocop'
gem 'rspec'
# good only if TreatCommentsAsGroupSeparators is true
# For code quality
gem 'rubocop'
# For tests
gem 'rspec'
Use %i
or %I
for an array of symbols. Open
gem "rubocop", "~> 0.46", :platform => [:ruby_20, :ruby_21, :ruby_22, :ruby_23]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop can check for array literals made up of symbols that are not using the %i() syntax.
Alternatively, it checks for symbol arrays using the %i() syntax on projects which do not want to use that syntax.
Configuration option: MinSize
If set, arrays with fewer elements than this value will not trigger the
cop. For example, a MinSize of
3` will not enforce a style on an array
of 2 or fewer elements.
Example: EnforcedStyle: percent (default)
# good
%i[foo bar baz]
# bad
[:foo, :bar, :baz]
Example: EnforcedStyle: brackets
# good
[:foo, :bar, :baz]
# bad
%i[foo bar baz]
Use %i
or %I
for an array of symbols. Open
gem "byebug", :platform => [:ruby_20, :ruby_21, :ruby_22, :ruby_23, :ruby_24, :ruby_25]
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop can check for array literals made up of symbols that are not using the %i() syntax.
Alternatively, it checks for symbol arrays using the %i() syntax on projects which do not want to use that syntax.
Configuration option: MinSize
If set, arrays with fewer elements than this value will not trigger the
cop. For example, a MinSize of
3` will not enforce a style on an array
of 2 or fewer elements.
Example: EnforcedStyle: percent (default)
# good
%i[foo bar baz]
# bad
[:foo, :bar, :baz]
Example: EnforcedStyle: brackets
# good
[:foo, :bar, :baz]
# bad
%i[foo bar baz]
Avoid comparing a variable with multiple items in a conditional, use Array#include?
instead. Open
return :class if klass == Class || klass == Module
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks against comparing a variable with multiple items, where
Array#include?
could be used instead to avoid code repetition.
Example:
# bad
a = 'a'
foo if a == 'a' || a == 'b' || a == 'c'
# good
a = 'a'
foo if ['a', 'b', 'c'].include?(a)
Use uppercase heredoc delimiters. Open
ruby_eval
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that your heredocs are using the configured case. By default it is configured to enforce uppercase heredocs.
Example: EnforcedStyle: uppercase (default)
# bad
<<-sql
SELECT * FROM foo
sql
# good
<<-SQL
SELECT * FROM foo
SQL
Example: EnforcedStyle: lowercase
# bad
<<-SQL
SELECT * FROM foo
SQL
# good
<<-sql
SELECT * FROM foo
sql
FIXME found Open
# FIXME : this looks like untested code (commenting it out doesn't make specs red)
- Exclude checks