decko-commons/decko

View on GitHub
cardname/lib/cardname/contextual.rb

Summary

Maintainability
A
55 mins
Test Coverage
A
100%

Cyclomatic complexity for absolutize_contextual_parts is too high. [8/6]
Open

    def absolutize_contextual_parts context
      parts.map do |part|
        case part
        when /^_user$/i            then user_part part
        when /^_main$/i            then self.class.params[:main_name]
Severity: Minor
Found in cardname/lib/cardname/contextual.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

Assignment Branch Condition size for absolutize_contextual_parts is too high. [16.55/15]
Open

    def absolutize_contextual_parts context
      parts.map do |part|
        case part
        when /^_user$/i            then user_part part
        when /^_main$/i            then self.class.params[:main_name]
Severity: Minor
Found in cardname/lib/cardname/contextual.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Method parts_minus has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def parts_minus keys_to_ignore
      parts.map do |part|
        next if part.empty?
        next if part =~ /^_/ # this removes relative parts.  why?
        next if keys_to_ignore.member? part.to_name.key
Severity: Minor
Found in cardname/lib/cardname/contextual.rb - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Use match? instead of =~ when MatchData is not used.
Open

        next if part =~ /^_/ # this removes relative parts.  why?
Severity: Minor
Found in cardname/lib/cardname/contextual.rb by rubocop

In Ruby 2.4, String#match?, Regexp#match? and Symbol#match? have been added. The methods are faster than match. Because the methods avoid creating a MatchData object or saving backref. So, when MatchData is not used, use match? instead of match.

Example:

# bad
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# bad
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match?(/re/)
    do_something
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x =~ /re/
    do_something(Regexp.last_match)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if x.match(/re/)
    do_something($~)
  end
end

# good
def foo
  if /re/ === x
    do_something($~)
  end
end

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status