deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j

View on GitHub
codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

File ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java has 651 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 *  ******************************************************************************
 *  *
 *  *
 *  * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the

    Method standardizeNames has 137 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public static Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor> standardizeNames
                (Map<String, List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> toStandardize, String opName) {
            Map<String,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> ret = new HashMap<>();
            Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> dimensionProposals = new HashMap<>();
            Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> inPlaceProposals = new HashMap<>();

      ArgDescriptorParserUtils has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

      public class ArgDescriptorParserUtils {
          public final static String DEFAULT_OUTPUT_FILE = "op-ir.proto";
          public final static Pattern numberPattern = Pattern.compile("\\([\\d]+\\)");
      
      
      

        Method mergeProposals has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            private static List<ArgDescriptorProposal> mergeProposals(Map<String, List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> ret, List<ArgDescriptorProposal> dimensionsList, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType argType, String nameOfArgDescriptor) {
                double priorityWeight = 0.0;
                ArgDescriptorProposal.ArgDescriptorProposalBuilder newProposalBuilder = ArgDescriptorProposal.builder();
                Counter<Integer> indexCounter = new Counter<>();
                List<ArgDescriptorProposal> proposalsOutsideType = new ArrayList<>();

          Method argTypeForParam has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              public static OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType argTypeForParam(ResolvedParameterDeclaration parameterDeclaration) {
                  String type = parameterDeclaration.describeType();
                  boolean isEnum = false;
                  try {
                      isEnum =  Class.forName(parameterDeclaration.asParameter().describeType()).isEnum();

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method matchesArgDeclaration has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              public static boolean matchesArgDeclaration(String argType,String testLine) {
                  Matcher matcher = Pattern.compile(argType + ARGUMENT_ENDING_PATTERN).matcher(testLine);
                  Matcher argOnly = Pattern.compile(argType + ARGUMENT_PATTERN).matcher(testLine);
                  // Matcher arrArg = Pattern.compile(argType + ARGUMENT_PATTERN)
                  boolean ret =  matcher.find();

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method standardizeNames has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              public static Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor> standardizeNames
                      (Map<String, List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> toStandardize, String opName) {
                  Map<String,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> ret = new HashMap<>();
                  Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> dimensionProposals = new HashMap<>();
                  Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> inPlaceProposals = new HashMap<>();

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Avoid too many return statements within this method.
          Open

                      return OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType.DATA_TYPE;

            Avoid too many return statements within this method.
            Open

                            return OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType.INPUT_TENSOR;

              Avoid too many return statements within this method.
              Open

                          else return OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType.OUTPUT_TENSOR;

                Method mergeDescriptorsOfSameIndex has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    public static OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor mergeDescriptorsOfSameIndex(OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor one, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor two) {
                        if(one.getArgIndex() != two.getArgIndex()) {
                            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Argument indices for both arg descriptors were not the same. First one was " + one.getArgIndex() + " and second was " + two.getArgIndex());
                        }
                
                

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Method mergeProposals has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    private static List<ArgDescriptorProposal> mergeProposals(Map<String, List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> ret, List<ArgDescriptorProposal> dimensionsList, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType argType, String nameOfArgDescriptor) {
                        double priorityWeight = 0.0;
                        ArgDescriptorProposal.ArgDescriptorProposalBuilder newProposalBuilder = ArgDescriptorProposal.builder();
                        Counter<Integer> indexCounter = new Counter<>();
                        List<ArgDescriptorProposal> proposalsOutsideType = new ArrayList<>();

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Method isValidIdentifier has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    public static boolean isValidIdentifier(String input) {
                        if(input == null || input.isEmpty())
                            return false;
                
                        for(int i = 0; i < input.length(); i++) {

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    public static Set<String> inputNames = new HashSet<String>() {{
                        add("input");
                        add("inputs");
                        add("i_v");
                        add("x");
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 78..90
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 92..104
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 116..128

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 76.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    public final static Set<String> fieldNameFilters = new HashSet<String>() {{
                        add("sameDiff");
                        add("xVertexId");
                        add("yVertexId");
                        add("zVertexId");
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 92..104
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 116..128
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 130..142

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 76.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    public static Set<String> dimensionNames = new HashSet<String>() {{
                        add("jaxis");
                        add("axis");
                        add("dimensions");
                        add("dimensionz");
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 78..90
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 92..104
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 130..142

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 76.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    public final static  Set<String> fieldNameFiltersDynamicCustomOps = new HashSet<String>() {{
                        add("sameDiff");
                        add("xVertexId");
                        add("yVertexId");
                        add("zVertexId");
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 78..90
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 116..128
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 130..142

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 76.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                                || (testLine.contains("==") && argOnlyResult && !testLine.contains("if") && !testLine.contains("REQUIRE_TRUE")) && !testLine.contains("->rankOf()")
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 836..836
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 839..839

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 42.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                                ||  (testLine.contains("->") && argOnlyResult && !testLine.contains("if") && !testLine.contains("REQUIRE_TRUE")) && !testLine.contains("->rankOf()");
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 836..836
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 837..837

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 42.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                                || (testLine.contains("))") && argOnlyResult && !testLine.contains("if") && !testLine.contains("REQUIRE_TRUE")) && !testLine.contains("->rankOf()")
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 837..837
                codegen/libnd4j-gen/src/main/java/org/nd4j/descriptor/proposal/impl/ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java on lines 839..839

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 42.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                There are no issues that match your filters.

                Category
                Status