File ArgDescriptorParserUtils.java
has 651 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* ******************************************************************************
* *
* *
* * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the
Method standardizeNames
has 137 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor> standardizeNames
(Map<String, List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> toStandardize, String opName) {
Map<String,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> ret = new HashMap<>();
Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> dimensionProposals = new HashMap<>();
Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> inPlaceProposals = new HashMap<>();
ArgDescriptorParserUtils
has 34 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class ArgDescriptorParserUtils {
public final static String DEFAULT_OUTPUT_FILE = "op-ir.proto";
public final static Pattern numberPattern = Pattern.compile("\\([\\d]+\\)");
Method mergeProposals
has 40 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static List<ArgDescriptorProposal> mergeProposals(Map<String, List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> ret, List<ArgDescriptorProposal> dimensionsList, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType argType, String nameOfArgDescriptor) {
double priorityWeight = 0.0;
ArgDescriptorProposal.ArgDescriptorProposalBuilder newProposalBuilder = ArgDescriptorProposal.builder();
Counter<Integer> indexCounter = new Counter<>();
List<ArgDescriptorProposal> proposalsOutsideType = new ArrayList<>();
Method argTypeForParam
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType argTypeForParam(ResolvedParameterDeclaration parameterDeclaration) {
String type = parameterDeclaration.describeType();
boolean isEnum = false;
try {
isEnum = Class.forName(parameterDeclaration.asParameter().describeType()).isEnum();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method matchesArgDeclaration
has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static boolean matchesArgDeclaration(String argType,String testLine) {
Matcher matcher = Pattern.compile(argType + ARGUMENT_ENDING_PATTERN).matcher(testLine);
Matcher argOnly = Pattern.compile(argType + ARGUMENT_PATTERN).matcher(testLine);
// Matcher arrArg = Pattern.compile(argType + ARGUMENT_PATTERN)
boolean ret = matcher.find();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method standardizeNames
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor> standardizeNames
(Map<String, List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> toStandardize, String opName) {
Map<String,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> ret = new HashMap<>();
Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> dimensionProposals = new HashMap<>();
Map<Pair<Integer, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType>,List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> inPlaceProposals = new HashMap<>();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType.DATA_TYPE;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType.INPUT_TENSOR;
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
else return OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType.OUTPUT_TENSOR;
Method mergeDescriptorsOfSameIndex
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor mergeDescriptorsOfSameIndex(OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor one, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor two) {
if(one.getArgIndex() != two.getArgIndex()) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Argument indices for both arg descriptors were not the same. First one was " + one.getArgIndex() + " and second was " + two.getArgIndex());
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method mergeProposals
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static List<ArgDescriptorProposal> mergeProposals(Map<String, List<ArgDescriptorProposal>> ret, List<ArgDescriptorProposal> dimensionsList, OpNamespace.ArgDescriptor.ArgType argType, String nameOfArgDescriptor) {
double priorityWeight = 0.0;
ArgDescriptorProposal.ArgDescriptorProposalBuilder newProposalBuilder = ArgDescriptorProposal.builder();
Counter<Integer> indexCounter = new Counter<>();
List<ArgDescriptorProposal> proposalsOutsideType = new ArrayList<>();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method isValidIdentifier
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static boolean isValidIdentifier(String input) {
if(input == null || input.isEmpty())
return false;
for(int i = 0; i < input.length(); i++) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static Set<String> inputNames = new HashSet<String>() {{
add("input");
add("inputs");
add("i_v");
add("x");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public final static Set<String> fieldNameFilters = new HashSet<String>() {{
add("sameDiff");
add("xVertexId");
add("yVertexId");
add("zVertexId");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public static Set<String> dimensionNames = new HashSet<String>() {{
add("jaxis");
add("axis");
add("dimensions");
add("dimensionz");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
public final static Set<String> fieldNameFiltersDynamicCustomOps = new HashSet<String>() {{
add("sameDiff");
add("xVertexId");
add("yVertexId");
add("zVertexId");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 76.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
|| (testLine.contains("==") && argOnlyResult && !testLine.contains("if") && !testLine.contains("REQUIRE_TRUE")) && !testLine.contains("->rankOf()")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
|| (testLine.contains("->") && argOnlyResult && !testLine.contains("if") && !testLine.contains("REQUIRE_TRUE")) && !testLine.contains("->rankOf()");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
|| (testLine.contains("))") && argOnlyResult && !testLine.contains("if") && !testLine.contains("REQUIRE_TRUE")) && !testLine.contains("->rankOf()")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76