deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j

View on GitHub
datavec/datavec-api/src/main/java/org/datavec/api/transform/reduce/Reducer.java

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Method aggregableReducer has a Cognitive Complexity of 28 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public IAggregableReduceOp<List<Writable>, List<Writable>> aggregableReducer() {
        //Go through each writable, and reduce according to whatever strategy is specified

        if (schema == null)

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File Reducer.java has 335 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 *  ******************************************************************************
 *  *
 *  *
 *  * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the

    Builder has 25 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public static class Builder {
    
            private ReduceOp defaultOp;
            private Map<String, List<ReduceOp>> opMap = new HashMap<>();
            private Map<String, AggregableColumnReduction> customReductions = new HashMap<>();

      Method transform has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          @Override
          public Schema transform(Schema schema) {
              int nCols = schema.numColumns();
              List<String> colNames = schema.getColumnNames();
              List<ColumnMetaData> meta = schema.getColumnMetaData();

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method aggregableReducer has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          @Override
          public IAggregableReduceOp<List<Writable>, List<Writable>> aggregableReducer() {
              //Go through each writable, and reduce according to whatever strategy is specified
      
              if (schema == null)

        Method getMetaForColumn has 41 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            private static ColumnMetaData getMetaForColumn(ReduceOp op, String name, ColumnMetaData inMeta) {
                inMeta = inMeta.clone();
                switch (op) {
                    // type-preserving operations
                    case Min:

          Method transform has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              @Override
              public Schema transform(Schema schema) {
                  int nCols = schema.numColumns();
                  List<String> colNames = schema.getColumnNames();
                  List<ColumnMetaData> meta = schema.getColumnMetaData();

            Method getMetaForColumn has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                private static ColumnMetaData getMetaForColumn(ReduceOp op, String name, ColumnMetaData inMeta) {
                    inMeta = inMeta.clone();
                    switch (op) {
                        // type-preserving operations
                        case Min:

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method toString has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                @Override
                public String toString() {
                    StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder("Reducer(");
                    if (keyColumns != null) {
                        sb.append("keyColumns=").append(keyColumns).append(",");

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    private Builder add(ReduceOp op, String[] cols) {
                        for (String s : cols) {
                            List<ReduceOp> ops = new ArrayList<>();
                            if (opMap.containsKey(s))
                                ops.addAll(opMap.get(s));
            datavec/datavec-api/src/main/java/org/datavec/api/transform/reduce/Reducer.java on lines 337..346

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 65.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    private Builder addAll(List<ReduceOp> ops, String[] cols) {
                        for (String s : cols) {
                            List<ReduceOp> theseOps = new ArrayList<>();
                            if (opMap.containsKey(s))
                                theseOps.addAll(opMap.get(s));
            datavec/datavec-api/src/main/java/org/datavec/api/transform/reduce/Reducer.java on lines 326..335

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 65.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status