deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j

View on GitHub
deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j-nlp-parent/deeplearning4j-nlp/src/main/java/org/deeplearning4j/models/word2vec/wordstore/VocabularyHolder.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
3 days
Test Coverage

File VocabularyHolder.java has 351 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 *  ******************************************************************************
 *  *
 *  *
 *  * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the

    Method updateHuffmanCodes has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public List<VocabularyWord> updateHuffmanCodes() {
            int min1i;
            int min2i;
            int b;
            int i;

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    VocabularyHolder has 27 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    public class VocabularyHolder implements Serializable {
        private final Map<String, VocabularyWord> vocabulary = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();
    
        // idxMap marked as transient, since there's no real reason to save this data on serialization
        private transient Map<Integer, VocabularyWord> idxMap = new ConcurrentHashMap<>();

      Method updateHuffmanCodes has 71 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public List<VocabularyWord> updateHuffmanCodes() {
              int min1i;
              int min2i;
              int b;
              int i;

        Method activateScavenger has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            protected synchronized void activateScavenger() {
                int initialSize = vocabulary.size();
                List<VocabularyWord> words = new ArrayList<>(vocabulary.values());
                for (VocabularyWord word : words) {
                    // scavenging could be applied only to non-special tokens that are below minWordFrequency

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method transferBackToVocabCache has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            public void transferBackToVocabCache(VocabCache cache, boolean emptyHolder) {
                if (!(cache instanceof InMemoryLookupCache))
                    throw new IllegalStateException("Sorry, only InMemoryLookupCache use implemented.");
        
                // make sure that huffman codes are updated before transfer

        Cognitive Complexity

        Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

        A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

        • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
        • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
        • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

        Further reading

        Method transferBackToVocabCache has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            public void transferBackToVocabCache(VocabCache cache, boolean emptyHolder) {
                if (!(cache instanceof InMemoryLookupCache))
                    throw new IllegalStateException("Sorry, only InMemoryLookupCache use implemented.");
        
                // make sure that huffman codes are updated before transfer

          Method activateScavenger has 27 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              protected synchronized void activateScavenger() {
                  int initialSize = vocabulary.size();
                  List<VocabularyWord> words = new ArrayList<>(vocabulary.values());
                  for (VocabularyWord word : words) {
                      // scavenging could be applied only to non-special tokens that are below minWordFrequency

            Method truncateVocabulary has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public void truncateVocabulary(int threshold) {
                    logger.debug("Truncating vocabulary to minWordFrequency: [" + threshold + "]");
                    Set<String> keyset = vocabulary.keySet();
                    for (String word : keyset) {
                        VocabularyWord vw = vocabulary.get(word);

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method addWord has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public void addWord(String word) {
                    if (!vocabulary.containsKey(word)) {
                        VocabularyWord vw = new VocabularyWord(word);
            
                        /*

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                    for (int a = 0; a < vocab.size(); a++) {
                        // First, find two smallest nodes 'min1, min2'
                        if (pos1 >= 0) {
                            if (count[pos1] < count[pos2]) {
                                min1i = pos1;
            deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j-nlp-parent/deeplearning4j-nlp/src/main/java/org/deeplearning4j/models/word2vec/Huffman.java on lines 97..128

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 228.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public static int[] listToArray(List<Integer> points, int codeLen) {
                    int[] array = new int[points.size()];
                    for (int x = 0; x < points.size(); x++) {
                        array[x] = points.get(x).intValue();
                    }
            deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j-nlp-parent/deeplearning4j-nlp/src/main/java/org/deeplearning4j/models/embeddings/loader/WordVectorSerializer.java on lines 2120..2126

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 63.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public static List<Byte> arrayToList(byte[] array, int codeLen) {
                    List<Byte> result = new ArrayList<>();
                    for (int x = 0; x < codeLen; x++) {
                        result.add(array[x]);
                    }
            deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j-nlp-parent/deeplearning4j-nlp/src/main/java/org/deeplearning4j/models/embeddings/loader/WordVectorSerializer.java on lines 2104..2110
            deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j-nlp-parent/deeplearning4j-nlp/src/main/java/org/deeplearning4j/models/embeddings/loader/WordVectorSerializer.java on lines 2135..2141
            deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j-nlp-parent/deeplearning4j-nlp/src/main/java/org/deeplearning4j/models/word2vec/wordstore/VocabularyHolder.java on lines 216..222

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 49.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public static List<Integer> arrayToList(int[] array, int codeLen) {
                    List<Integer> result = new ArrayList<>();
                    for (int x = 0; x < codeLen; x++) {
                        result.add(array[x]);
                    }
            deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j-nlp-parent/deeplearning4j-nlp/src/main/java/org/deeplearning4j/models/embeddings/loader/WordVectorSerializer.java on lines 2104..2110
            deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j-nlp-parent/deeplearning4j-nlp/src/main/java/org/deeplearning4j/models/embeddings/loader/WordVectorSerializer.java on lines 2135..2141
            deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j-nlp-parent/deeplearning4j-nlp/src/main/java/org/deeplearning4j/models/word2vec/wordstore/VocabularyHolder.java on lines 186..192

            Duplicated Code

            Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

            Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

            When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

            Tuning

            This issue has a mass of 49.

            We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

            The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

            If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

            See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

            Refactorings

            Further Reading

            There are no issues that match your filters.

            Category
            Status