File BaseMultiLayerUpdater.java
has 330 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* ******************************************************************************
* *
* *
* * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the
Method preApply
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void preApply(Trainable layer, Gradient gradient, int iteration) {
if (layer.getConfig() == null || layer.numParams() == 0) {
//Layer does not have parameters -> no gradient
return;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method update
has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public synchronized void update(Gradient gradient, int iteration, int epoch, int batchSize, LayerWorkspaceMgr workspaceMgr) {
//First: check if gradient is standard or external...
//In a MultiLayerNetwork, the INDArray returned by .gradient() is always the standard full view array
// hence should be the same object under normal circumstances
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method preApply
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void preApply(Trainable layer, Gradient gradient, int iteration) {
if (layer.getConfig() == null || layer.numParams() == 0) {
//Layer does not have parameters -> no gradient
return;
Method update
has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public synchronized void update(Gradient gradient, int iteration, int epoch, int batchSize, LayerWorkspaceMgr workspaceMgr) {
//First: check if gradient is standard or external...
//In a MultiLayerNetwork, the INDArray returned by .gradient() is always the standard full view array
// hence should be the same object under normal circumstances
Method getMinibatchDivisionSubsets
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected List<INDArray> getMinibatchDivisionSubsets(INDArray from){
from = from.reshape(from.length());
List<INDArray> out = new ArrayList<>();
long paramsSoFar = 0;
long currentStart = 0;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method getMinibatchDivisionSubsets
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected List<INDArray> getMinibatchDivisionSubsets(INDArray from){
from = from.reshape(from.length());
List<INDArray> out = new ArrayList<>();
long paramsSoFar = 0;
long currentStart = 0;
Method update
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void update(Trainable layer, Gradient gradient, int iteration, int epoch, int batchSize, LayerWorkspaceMgr workspaceMgr) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (paramsViewSoFar + paramSizeThisVariable > Integer.MAX_VALUE || paramsViewSoFar + paramSizeThisVariable > Integer.MAX_VALUE)
throw new ND4JArraySizeException();
Method update
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public synchronized void update(Gradient gradient, int iteration, int epoch, int batchSize, LayerWorkspaceMgr workspaceMgr) {
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public boolean equals(Object o) {
if (this == o)
return true;
if (o == null || getClass() != o.getClass())
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 74.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (layerGradientView != null) {
double layerL2 = layerGradientView.norm2Number().doubleValue();
if (layerL2 > threshold) {
double scalingFactor = threshold / layerL2; // g = g / l2 * threshold ->
layerGradientView.muli(scalingFactor);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (INDArray g : gradient.gradientForVariable().values()) {
double l2 = g.norm2Number().doubleValue();
if (l2 > threshold) {
double scalingFactor = l2 / threshold;
g.divi(scalingFactor);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76