File CrashReportingUtil.java
has 518 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* ******************************************************************************
* *
* *
* * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the
Method generateMemoryStatus
has a Cognitive Complexity of 47 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String generateMemoryStatus(Model net, int minibatch, InputType... inputTypes){
MultiLayerNetwork mln = null;
ComputationGraph cg = null;
boolean isMLN;
if(net instanceof MultiLayerNetwork){
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method generateMemoryStatus
has 143 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String generateMemoryStatus(Model net, int minibatch, InputType... inputTypes){
MultiLayerNetwork mln = null;
ComputationGraph cg = null;
boolean isMLN;
if(net instanceof MultiLayerNetwork){
Method genericMemoryStatus
has 62 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static StringBuilder genericMemoryStatus(){
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.append("========== Memory Information ==========\n");
Method appendActivationShapes
has 52 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void appendActivationShapes(ComputationGraph net, StringBuilder sb, int bytesPerElement){
INDArray[] input = net.getInputs();
if(input == null){
return;
}
Method appendActivationShapes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void appendActivationShapes(ComputationGraph net, StringBuilder sb, int bytesPerElement){
INDArray[] input = net.getInputs();
if(input == null){
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method appendActivationShapes
has 47 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void appendActivationShapes(MultiLayerNetwork net, InputType inputType, int minibatch, StringBuilder sb, int bytesPerElement){
INDArray input = net.getInput();
if(input == null && inputType == null){
return;
}
Method appendHelperInformation
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void appendHelperInformation(StringBuilder sb, Layer[] layers){
sb.append("\n----- Layer Helpers - Memory Use -----\n");
int helperCount = 0;
long helperWithMemCount = 0L;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method appendActivationShapes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void appendActivationShapes(MultiLayerNetwork net, InputType inputType, int minibatch, StringBuilder sb, int bytesPerElement){
INDArray input = net.getInput();
if(input == null && inputType == null){
return;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method appendHelperInformation
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void appendHelperInformation(StringBuilder sb, Layer[] layers){
sb.append("\n----- Layer Helpers - Memory Use -----\n");
int helperCount = 0;
long helperWithMemCount = 0L;
Method writeMemoryCrashDump
has 35 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static void writeMemoryCrashDump(@NonNull Model net, @NonNull Throwable e){
if(!crashDumpsEnabled){
return;
}
Method genericMemoryStatus
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static StringBuilder genericMemoryStatus(){
StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
sb.append("========== Memory Information ==========\n");
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method appendActivationShapes
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static void appendActivationShapes(MultiLayerNetwork net, InputType inputType, int minibatch, StringBuilder sb, int bytesPerElement){
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(allWs != null && allWs.size() > 0) {
sb.append("Current thread workspaces:\n");
//Name, open, size, currently allocated
String wsFormat = " %-26s%-12s%-30s%-20s";
sb.append(String.format(wsFormat, "Name", "State", "Size", "# Cycles")).append("\n");
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 134.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
private static String fBytes(long bytes){
String s = BinaryByteUnit.format(bytes, "#.00");
String format = "%10s";
s = String.format(format, s);
if(bytes >= 1024){
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 70.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
sb.append(fBytes("JVM Memory: XMX", xmx))
.append(fBytes("JVM Memory: current", jvmTotal))
.append(fBytes("JavaCPP Memory: Max Bytes", javacppMaxBytes))
.append(fBytes("JavaCPP Memory: Max Physical", javacppMaxPhys))
.append(fBytes("JavaCPP Memory: Current Bytes", javacppCurrBytes))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 52.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(cg.getConfiguration().getBackpropType() == BackpropType.TruncatedBPTT){
sb.append(f("TBPTT Length", cg.getConfiguration().getTbpttFwdLength() + "/" + cg.getConfiguration().getTbpttBackLength()));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(mln.getLayerWiseConfigurations().getBackpropType() == BackpropType.TruncatedBPTT){
sb.append(f("TBPTT Length", mln.getLayerWiseConfigurations().getTbpttFwdLength() + "/" + mln.getLayerWiseConfigurations().getTbpttBackLength()));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76