Method getTraceEvents has a Cognitive Complexity of 79 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static TraceEvent[] getTraceEvents(File file, ProfileFormat profileFormat, boolean aggregateTFSubOps) {
ObjectMapper json = ProfilingListener.jsonMapper();
String content = null;
try(BufferedInputStream bufferedInputStream = new BufferedInputStream(new FileInputStream(file))) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method compareProfiles has a Cognitive Complexity of 58 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String compareProfiles(final Config c){
TraceEvent[] t1 = c.profile1IsDir() ? getTraceEventsDir(c.profile1(), c.profile1Format()) : getTraceEvents(c.profile1(), c.profile1Format());
TraceEvent[] t2 = c.profile2IsDir() ? getTraceEventsDir(c.profile2(), c.profile2Format()) : getTraceEvents(c.profile2(), c.profile2Format());
final Pair<Long, Map<String, OpStats>> p1 = aggregateTraceEvents(t1);- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
File ProfileAnalyzer.java has 376 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* ******************************************************************************
* *
* *
* * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under theMethod compareProfiles has 122 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String compareProfiles(final Config c){
TraceEvent[] t1 = c.profile1IsDir() ? getTraceEventsDir(c.profile1(), c.profile1Format()) : getTraceEvents(c.profile1(), c.profile1Format());
TraceEvent[] t2 = c.profile2IsDir() ? getTraceEventsDir(c.profile2(), c.profile2Format()) : getTraceEvents(c.profile2(), c.profile2Format());
final Pair<Long, Map<String, OpStats>> p1 = aggregateTraceEvents(t1);Method getTraceEvents has 110 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static TraceEvent[] getTraceEvents(File file, ProfileFormat profileFormat, boolean aggregateTFSubOps) {
ObjectMapper json = ProfilingListener.jsonMapper();
String content = null;
try(BufferedInputStream bufferedInputStream = new BufferedInputStream(new FileInputStream(file))) {Consider simplifying this complex logical expression. Open
if(last != null && last.getPh() == Phase.X && te.getPh() == Phase.X &&
last.getName().equals(te.getName()) &&
last.getArgs() != null && te.getArgs() != null &&
last.getArgs().get("name").equals(te.getArgs().get("name")) &&
last.getArgs().get("op").equals(te.getArgs().get("op"))){Method summarizeTraceEvents has 30 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String summarizeTraceEvents(TraceEvent[] events) {
Pair<Long, Map<String, OpStats>> p = aggregateTraceEvents(events);
final Map<String, OpStats> stats = p.getSecond();
long allOpsUs = p.getFirst();
Method compareProfiles has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static String compareProfiles(@NonNull File file1, @NonNull File file2, @NonNull ProfileFormat format1, @NonNull ProfileFormat format2,
boolean firstIsDir, boolean secondIsDir, String name1, String name2, final SortBy sortBy) {Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (dur == null && te.getDur() == null)
continue;Method aggregateTraceEvents has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
private static Pair<Long, Map<String, OpStats>> aggregateTraceEvents(TraceEvent[] events) {
//Summarize by op (instance) name:
final Map<String, OpStats> stats = new HashMap<>();
for (TraceEvent e : events) {
if (e.getPh() != Phase.X || e.getDur() == null) {- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(c.format() == null || c.format() == OutputFormat.TEXT){
headerFormat = "%-" + longestName + "s%-" + longestOpName + "s%-10s%-10s%-16s%-13s%-13s%-14s%-14s%-12s%-12s%-14s%-14s%-10s%-10s%-10s%-10s\n";
format = "%-" + longestName + "s%-" + longestOpName + "s%-10d%-10d%-16.2f%-13.2f%-13.2f%-14d%-14d%-12.2f%-12.2f%-14d%-14d%-10d%-10d%-10.2f%-10.2f\n";
} else {
headerFormat = "%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s\n";- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 90.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if(c.format() == null || c.format() == OutputFormat.TEXT) {
headerFormat2 = "%-" + longestName + "s%-" + longestOpName + "s%-10s%-10s%-10s%-10s%-10s%-10s\n";
format3 = "%-" + longestName + "s%-" + longestOpName + "s%-10d%-10d%-10.2f%-10d%-10d%-10.2f\n";
} else {
headerFormat2 = "%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s,%s\n";- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 90.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (String s : l) {
longestName = Math.max(longestName, s.length() + 1);
longestOpName = Math.max(longestOpName, stats.get(s).getOpName().length() + 1);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (String s : l) {
longestName = Math.max(longestName, s.length() + 1);
longestOpName = Math.max(longestOpName, stats.get(s).getOpName().length() + 1);
}- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 56.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76