deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j

View on GitHub
nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/autodiff/samediff/internal/TrainingSession.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

Method getOutputs has a Cognitive Complexity of 92 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    @Override
    public ExecutionResult getOutputs(Pair<SameDiffOp, OpContext> opPair, FrameIter outputFrameIter, Set<VarId> opInputs, Set<VarId> allIterInputs,
                                      Set<String> constAndPhInputs, List<Listener> listeners, At at, MultiDataSet batch, Set<String> allReqVariables, Map<String, SDValue> otherPlaceHolders) {
        //Get outputs from InferenceSession
        ExecutionResult out = super.getOutputs(opPair, outputFrameIter, opInputs, allIterInputs, constAndPhInputs, listeners, at, batch, allReqVariables, otherPlaceHolders);

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method trainingIteration has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Loss trainingIteration(TrainingConfig config, Map<String, INDArray> placeholders, Set<String> paramsToTrain, Map<String, GradientUpdater> updaters,
                                  MultiDataSet batch, List<String> lossVariables, List<Listener> listeners, At at) {
        this.config = config;
        this.updaters = updaters;
        if(batch != null) {

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method trainingIteration has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public Loss trainingIteration(TrainingConfig config, Map<String, INDArray> placeholders, Set<String> paramsToTrain, Map<String, GradientUpdater> updaters,
                                  MultiDataSet batch, List<String> lossVariables, List<Listener> listeners, At at) {
        this.config = config;
        this.updaters = updaters;
        if(batch != null) {

    Method getOutputs has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        @Override
        public ExecutionResult getOutputs(Pair<SameDiffOp, OpContext> opPair, FrameIter outputFrameIter, Set<VarId> opInputs, Set<VarId> allIterInputs,
                                          Set<String> constAndPhInputs, List<Listener> listeners, At at, MultiDataSet batch, Set<String> allReqVariables, Map<String, SDValue> otherPlaceHolders) {
            //Get outputs from InferenceSession
            ExecutionResult out = super.getOutputs(opPair, outputFrameIter, opInputs, allIterInputs, constAndPhInputs, listeners, at, batch, allReqVariables, otherPlaceHolders);

      Method getOutputs has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public ExecutionResult getOutputs(Pair<SameDiffOp, OpContext> opPair, FrameIter outputFrameIter, Set<VarId> opInputs, Set<VarId> allIterInputs,
                                            Set<String> constAndPhInputs, List<Listener> listeners, At at, MultiDataSet batch, Set<String> allReqVariables, Map<String, SDValue> otherPlaceHolders) {

        Method trainingIteration has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            public Loss trainingIteration(TrainingConfig config, Map<String, INDArray> placeholders, Set<String> paramsToTrain, Map<String, GradientUpdater> updaters,
                                          MultiDataSet batch, List<String> lossVariables, List<Listener> listeners, At at) {

          Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
          Open

                                  if (reg.applyStep() == Regularization.ApplyStep.BEFORE_UPDATER) {
                                      if (this.listeners != null) {
                                          double score = reg.score(paramArr, at.iteration(), at.epoch());
                                          if (!currIterRegLoss.containsKey(reg.getClass())) {
                                              currIterRegLoss.put(reg.getClass(), new AtomicDouble());

            Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
            Open

                                    if (reg.applyStep() == Regularization.ApplyStep.POST_UPDATER) {
                                        if (this.listeners != null) {
                                            double score = reg.score(paramArr, at.iteration(), at.epoch());
                                            if (!currIterRegLoss.containsKey(reg.getClass())) {
                                                currIterRegLoss.put(reg.getClass(), new AtomicDouble());

              Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
              Open

                                      if (l.isActive(at.operation()))
                                          l.preUpdate(sameDiff, at, var, gradArr);

                Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                                if (r != null && r.size() > 0) {
                                    double lr = config.getUpdater().hasLearningRate() ? config.getUpdater().getLearningRate(at.iteration(), at.epoch()) : 1.0;
                                    for (Regularization reg : r) {
                                        if (reg.applyStep() == Regularization.ApplyStep.POST_UPDATER) {
                                            if (this.listeners != null) {
                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/autodiff/samediff/internal/TrainingSession.java on lines 215..229

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 168.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                                if (r != null && r.size() > 0) {
                                    double lr = config.getUpdater().hasLearningRate() ? config.getUpdater().getLearningRate(at.iteration(), at.epoch()) : 1.0;
                                    for (Regularization reg : r) {
                                        if (reg.applyStep() == Regularization.ApplyStep.BEFORE_UPDATER) {
                                            if (this.listeners != null) {
                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/autodiff/samediff/internal/TrainingSession.java on lines 234..248

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 168.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                There are no issues that match your filters.

                Category
                Status