Method getOutputs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 92 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public ExecutionResult getOutputs(Pair<SameDiffOp, OpContext> opPair, FrameIter outputFrameIter, Set<VarId> opInputs, Set<VarId> allIterInputs,
Set<String> constAndPhInputs, List<Listener> listeners, At at, MultiDataSet batch, Set<String> allReqVariables, Map<String, SDValue> otherPlaceHolders) {
//Get outputs from InferenceSession
ExecutionResult out = super.getOutputs(opPair, outputFrameIter, opInputs, allIterInputs, constAndPhInputs, listeners, at, batch, allReqVariables, otherPlaceHolders);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method trainingIteration
has a Cognitive Complexity of 27 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public Loss trainingIteration(TrainingConfig config, Map<String, INDArray> placeholders, Set<String> paramsToTrain, Map<String, GradientUpdater> updaters,
MultiDataSet batch, List<String> lossVariables, List<Listener> listeners, At at) {
this.config = config;
this.updaters = updaters;
if(batch != null) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method trainingIteration
has 73 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public Loss trainingIteration(TrainingConfig config, Map<String, INDArray> placeholders, Set<String> paramsToTrain, Map<String, GradientUpdater> updaters,
MultiDataSet batch, List<String> lossVariables, List<Listener> listeners, At at) {
this.config = config;
this.updaters = updaters;
if(batch != null) {
Method getOutputs
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public ExecutionResult getOutputs(Pair<SameDiffOp, OpContext> opPair, FrameIter outputFrameIter, Set<VarId> opInputs, Set<VarId> allIterInputs,
Set<String> constAndPhInputs, List<Listener> listeners, At at, MultiDataSet batch, Set<String> allReqVariables, Map<String, SDValue> otherPlaceHolders) {
//Get outputs from InferenceSession
ExecutionResult out = super.getOutputs(opPair, outputFrameIter, opInputs, allIterInputs, constAndPhInputs, listeners, at, batch, allReqVariables, otherPlaceHolders);
Method getOutputs
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public ExecutionResult getOutputs(Pair<SameDiffOp, OpContext> opPair, FrameIter outputFrameIter, Set<VarId> opInputs, Set<VarId> allIterInputs,
Set<String> constAndPhInputs, List<Listener> listeners, At at, MultiDataSet batch, Set<String> allReqVariables, Map<String, SDValue> otherPlaceHolders) {
Method trainingIteration
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public Loss trainingIteration(TrainingConfig config, Map<String, INDArray> placeholders, Set<String> paramsToTrain, Map<String, GradientUpdater> updaters,
MultiDataSet batch, List<String> lossVariables, List<Listener> listeners, At at) {
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (reg.applyStep() == Regularization.ApplyStep.BEFORE_UPDATER) {
if (this.listeners != null) {
double score = reg.score(paramArr, at.iteration(), at.epoch());
if (!currIterRegLoss.containsKey(reg.getClass())) {
currIterRegLoss.put(reg.getClass(), new AtomicDouble());
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (reg.applyStep() == Regularization.ApplyStep.POST_UPDATER) {
if (this.listeners != null) {
double score = reg.score(paramArr, at.iteration(), at.epoch());
if (!currIterRegLoss.containsKey(reg.getClass())) {
currIterRegLoss.put(reg.getClass(), new AtomicDouble());
Avoid deeply nested control flow statements. Open
if (l.isActive(at.operation()))
l.preUpdate(sameDiff, at, var, gradArr);
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (r != null && r.size() > 0) {
double lr = config.getUpdater().hasLearningRate() ? config.getUpdater().getLearningRate(at.iteration(), at.epoch()) : 1.0;
for (Regularization reg : r) {
if (reg.applyStep() == Regularization.ApplyStep.POST_UPDATER) {
if (this.listeners != null) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 168.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (r != null && r.size() > 0) {
double lr = config.getUpdater().hasLearningRate() ? config.getUpdater().getLearningRate(at.iteration(), at.epoch()) : 1.0;
for (Regularization reg : r) {
if (reg.applyStep() == Regularization.ApplyStep.BEFORE_UPDATER) {
if (this.listeners != null) {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 168.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76