BaseLevel2
has 48 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public abstract class BaseLevel2 extends BaseLevel implements Level2 {
/**
* gemv computes a matrix-vector product using a general matrix and performs one of the following matrix-vector operations:
* y := alpha*a*x + beta*y for trans = 'N'or'n';
* y := alpha*a'*x + beta*y for trans = 'T'or't';
File BaseLevel2.java
has 315 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/*
* ******************************************************************************
* *
* *
* * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the
Method dgbmv
has 14 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dgbmv(char order, char TransA, int M, int N, int KL, int KU, double alpha, INDArray A,
int lda, INDArray X, int incX, double beta, INDArray Y, int incY);
Method sgbmv
has 14 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void sgbmv(char order, char TransA, int M, int N, int KL, int KU, float alpha, INDArray A,
int lda, INDArray X, int incX, float beta, INDArray Y, int incY);
Method dsbmv
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dsbmv(char order, char Uplo, int N, int K, double alpha, INDArray A, int lda, INDArray X,
int incX, double beta, INDArray Y, int incY);
Method ssbmv
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void ssbmv(char order, char Uplo, int N, int K, float alpha, INDArray A, int lda, INDArray X,
int incX, float beta, INDArray Y, int incY);
Method dgemv
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dgemv(char order, char TransA, int M, int N, double alpha, INDArray A, int lda, INDArray X,
int incX, double beta, INDArray Y, int incY);
Method sgemv
has 12 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void sgemv(char order, char TransA, int M, int N, float alpha, INDArray A, int lda, INDArray X,
int incX, float beta, INDArray Y, int incY);
Method dsymv
has 11 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dsymv(char order, char Uplo, int N, double alpha, INDArray A, int lda, INDArray X, int incX,
double beta, INDArray Y, int incY);
Method ssymv
has 11 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void ssymv(char order, char Uplo, int N, float alpha, INDArray A, int lda, INDArray X, int incX,
float beta, INDArray Y, int incY);
Method sger
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void sger(char order, int M, int N, float alpha, INDArray X, int incX, INDArray Y, int incY,
INDArray A, int lda);
Method dtbsv
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dtbsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, int K, INDArray A, int lda,
INDArray X, int incX);
Method ssyr2
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void ssyr2(char order, char Uplo, int N, float alpha, INDArray X, int incX, INDArray Y, int incY,
INDArray A, int lda);
Method dspmv
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dspmv(char order, char Uplo, int N, double alpha, INDArray Ap, INDArray X, int incX,
double beta, INDArray Y, int incY);
Method dtbmv
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dtbmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, int K, INDArray A, int lda,
INDArray X, int incX);
Method sspmv
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void sspmv(char order, char Uplo, int N, float alpha, INDArray Ap, INDArray X, int incX,
float beta, INDArray Y, int incY);
Method stbmv
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void stbmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, int K, INDArray A, int lda,
INDArray X, int incX);
Method dger
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dger(char order, int M, int N, double alpha, INDArray X, int incX, INDArray Y, int incY,
INDArray A, int lda);
Method dsyr2
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dsyr2(char order, char Uplo, int N, double alpha, INDArray X, int incX, INDArray Y,
int incY, INDArray A, int lda);
Method stbsv
has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void stbsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, int K, INDArray A, int lda,
INDArray X, int incX);
Method dtrmv
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dtrmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, INDArray A, int lda, INDArray X,
int incX);
Method strsv
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void strsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, INDArray A, int lda, INDArray X,
int incX);
Method strmv
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void strmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, INDArray A, int lda, INDArray X,
int incX);
Method dspr2
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dspr2(char order, char Uplo, int N, double alpha, INDArray X, int incX, INDArray Y,
int incY, INDArray A);
Method sspr2
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void sspr2(char order, char Uplo, int N, float alpha, INDArray X, int incX, INDArray Y, int incY,
INDArray A);
Method gbmv
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void gbmv(char order, char TransA, int KL, int KU, double alpha, INDArray A, INDArray X, double beta,
INDArray Y) {
Method dtrsv
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dtrsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, INDArray A, int lda, INDArray X,
int incX);
Method stpmv
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void stpmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, INDArray Ap, INDArray X,
int incX);
Method dsyr
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dsyr(char order, char Uplo, int N, double alpha, INDArray X, int incX, INDArray A, int lda);
Method dtpsv
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dtpsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, INDArray Ap, INDArray X,
int incX);
Method dtpmv
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dtpmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, INDArray Ap, INDArray X,
int incX);
Method ssyr
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void ssyr(char order, char Uplo, int N, float alpha, INDArray X, int incX, INDArray A, int lda);
Method stpsv
has 8 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void stpsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, int N, INDArray Ap, INDArray X,
int incX);
Method dspr
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void dspr(char order, char Uplo, int N, double alpha, INDArray X, int incX, INDArray Ap);
Method spmv
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void spmv(char order, char Uplo, double alpha, INDArray Ap, INDArray X, double beta, INDArray Y) {
Method symv
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void symv(char order, char Uplo, double alpha, INDArray A, INDArray X, double beta, INDArray Y) {
Method gemv
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void gemv(char order, char transA, double alpha, INDArray A, INDArray X, double beta, INDArray Y) {
Method sbmv
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void sbmv(char order, char Uplo, double alpha, INDArray A, INDArray X, double beta, INDArray Y) {
Method sspr
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected abstract void sspr(char order, char Uplo, int N, float alpha, INDArray X, int incX, INDArray Ap);
Method tpsv
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void tpsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, INDArray Ap, INDArray X) {
Method spr2
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void spr2(char order, char Uplo, double alpha, INDArray X, INDArray Y, INDArray A) {
Method tbmv
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void tbmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, INDArray A, INDArray X) {
Method syr2
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void syr2(char order, char Uplo, double alpha, INDArray X, INDArray Y, INDArray A) {
Method tpmv
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void tpmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, INDArray Ap, INDArray X) {
Method trsv
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void trsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, INDArray A, INDArray X) {
Method syr
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void syr(char order, char Uplo, int N, double alpha, INDArray X, INDArray A) {
Method tbsv
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void tbsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, INDArray A, INDArray X) {
Method trmv
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void trmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, INDArray A, INDArray X) {
Method spr
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void spr(char order, char Uplo, double alpha, INDArray X, INDArray Ap) {
Method ger
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public void ger(char order, double alpha, INDArray X, INDArray Y, INDArray A) {
Method gbmv
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void gbmv(char order, char TransA, int KL, int KU, double alpha, INDArray A, INDArray X, double beta,
INDArray Y) {
if (OpProfiler.getInstance().getConfig().isCheckElapsedTime())
OpProfiler.getInstance().processBlasCall(false, A, X, Y);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method ger
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void ger(char order, double alpha, INDArray X, INDArray Y, INDArray A) {
if (OpProfiler.getInstance().getConfig().isCheckElapsedTime())
OpProfiler.getInstance().processBlasCall(false, A, X, Y);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void tbsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, INDArray A, INDArray X) {
if (OpProfiler.getInstance().getConfig().isCheckElapsedTime())
OpProfiler.getInstance().processBlasCall(false, A, X);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 211.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void tbmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, INDArray A, INDArray X) {
if (OpProfiler.getInstance().getConfig().isCheckElapsedTime())
OpProfiler.getInstance().processBlasCall(false, A, X);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 211.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void trsv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, INDArray A, INDArray X) {
if (OpProfiler.getInstance().getConfig().isCheckElapsedTime())
OpProfiler.getInstance().processBlasCall(false, A, X);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 193.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
public void trmv(char order, char Uplo, char TransA, char Diag, INDArray A, INDArray X) {
if (OpProfiler.getInstance().getConfig().isCheckElapsedTime())
OpProfiler.getInstance().processBlasCall(false, A, X);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 193.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else {
DefaultOpExecutioner.validateDataType(DataType.FLOAT, Ap, X);
stpsv(order, Uplo, TransA, Diag, (int) X.length(), Ap, X, X.stride(-1));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (X.data().dataType() == DataType.DOUBLE) {
DefaultOpExecutioner.validateDataType(DataType.DOUBLE, X, Ap);
dtpsv(order, Uplo, TransA, Diag, (int) X.length(), Ap, X, X.stride(-1));
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (X.data().dataType() == DataType.DOUBLE) {
DefaultOpExecutioner.validateDataType(DataType.DOUBLE, X);
dtpmv(order, Uplo, TransA, Diag, (int) Ap.length(), Ap, X, X.stride(-1));
} else {
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} else {
DefaultOpExecutioner.validateDataType(DataType.FLOAT, X);
stpmv(order, Uplo, TransA, Diag, (int) Ap.length(), Ap, X, X.stride(-1));
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (A.rows() > Integer.MAX_VALUE || A.columns() > Integer.MAX_VALUE || A.size(0) > Integer.MAX_VALUE)
throw new ND4JArraySizeException();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if (A.rows() > Integer.MAX_VALUE || A.columns() > Integer.MAX_VALUE || A.size(0) > Integer.MAX_VALUE)
throw new ND4JArraySizeException();
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 42.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76