Sign upLogin

deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j

View on GitHub
Star
nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage

File CheckUtil.java has 311 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 *  ******************************************************************************
 *  *
 *  *
 *  * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the
Severity: Minor
Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 3 hrs to fix

    Method checkGemm has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public static boolean checkGemm(INDArray a, INDArray b, INDArray c, boolean transposeA, boolean transposeB,
                    double alpha, double beta, double maxRelativeDifference, double minAbsDifference) {
        long commonDimA = (transposeA ? a.rows() : a.columns());
        long commonDimB = (transposeB ? b.columns() : b.rows());
        if (commonDimA != commonDimB)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method checkEntries has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public static boolean checkEntries(RealMatrix rmResult, INDArray result, double maxRelativeDifference,
                    double minAbsDifference) {
        int[] outShape = {rmResult.getRowDimension(), rmResult.getColumnDimension()};
        for (int i = 0; i < outShape[0]; i++) {
            for (int j = 0; j < outShape[1]; j++) {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method checkGemm has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public static boolean checkGemm(INDArray a, INDArray b, INDArray c, boolean transposeA, boolean transposeB,
                    double alpha, double beta, double maxRelativeDifference, double minAbsDifference) {
        long commonDimA = (transposeA ? a.rows() : a.columns());
        long commonDimB = (transposeB ? b.columns() : b.rows());
        if (commonDimA != commonDimB)
    Severity: Minor
    Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 1 hr to fix

      Method checkEntries has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public static boolean checkEntries(INDArray expected, INDArray actual, double maxRelativeDifference,
                    double minAbsDifference) {
        long[] outShape = expected.shape();
        for (int i = 0; i < outShape[0]; i++) {
            for (int j = 0; j < outShape[1]; j++) {
      Severity: Minor
      Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 1 hr to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method printGemmFailureDetails has 10 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public static void printGemmFailureDetails(INDArray a, INDArray b, INDArray c, boolean transposeA,
                    boolean transposeB, double alpha, double beta, RealMatrix expected, INDArray actual,
                    INDArray onCopies) {
      Severity: Major
      Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 1 hr to fix

        Method checkGemm has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            public static boolean checkGemm(INDArray a, INDArray b, INDArray c, boolean transposeA, boolean transposeB,
                    double alpha, double beta, double maxRelativeDifference, double minAbsDifference) {
        Severity: Major
        Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 1 hr to fix

          Method printMatrixFullPrecision has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              public static void printMatrixFullPrecision(INDArray matrix) {
        boolean floatType = (matrix.data().dataType() == DataType.FLOAT);
        printNDArrayHeader(matrix);
        long[] shape = matrix.shape();
        for (int i = 0; i < shape[0]; i++) {
          Severity: Minor
          Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 55 mins to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method printFailureDetails has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              public static void printFailureDetails(INDArray first, INDArray second, RealMatrix expected, INDArray actual,
                    INDArray onCopies, String op) {
          Severity: Minor
          Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 45 mins to fix

            Method printFailureDetails has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public static void printFailureDetails(INDArray first, INDArray second, INDArray expected, INDArray actual,
                    INDArray onCopies, String op) {
            Severity: Minor
            Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 45 mins to fix

              Method convertToApacheMatrix has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public static RealMatrix convertToApacheMatrix(INDArray matrix) {
        if (matrix.rank() != 2)
            throw new IllegalArgumentException("Input rank is not 2 (not matrix)");
        long[] shape = matrix.shape();
              Severity: Minor
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Method printApacheMatrix has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public static void printApacheMatrix(RealMatrix matrix) {
        int nRows = matrix.getRowDimension();
        int nCols = matrix.getColumnDimension();
        System.out.println("Apache Commons RealMatrix: Shape: [" + nRows + "," + nCols + "]");
        for (int i = 0; i < nRows; i++) {
              Severity: Minor
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java - About 25 mins to fix

              Cognitive Complexity

              Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

              A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

              • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
              • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
              • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

              Further reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public static boolean checkDivManually(INDArray first, INDArray second, double maxRelativeDifference,
                    double minAbsDifference) {
        //No apache commons element-wise division, but can do this manually

        INDArray result = first.div(second);
              Severity: Major
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
              nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java on lines 150..173

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 211.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public static boolean checkMulManually(INDArray first, INDArray second, double maxRelativeDifference,
                    double minAbsDifference) {
        //No apache commons element-wise multiply, but can do this manually

        INDArray result = first.mul(second);
              Severity: Major
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java and 1 other location - About 3 hrs to fix
              nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java on lines 175..198

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 211.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public static boolean checkSubtract(INDArray first, INDArray second, double maxRelativeDifference,
                    double minAbsDifference) {
        RealMatrix rmFirst = convertToApacheMatrix(first);
        RealMatrix rmSecond = convertToApacheMatrix(second);
              Severity: Major
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
              nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java on lines 113..129

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 129.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public static boolean checkAdd(INDArray first, INDArray second, double maxRelativeDifference,
                    double minAbsDifference) {
        RealMatrix rmFirst = convertToApacheMatrix(first);
        RealMatrix rmSecond = convertToApacheMatrix(second);
              Severity: Major
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java and 1 other location - About 2 hrs to fix
              nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java on lines 132..148

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 129.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public static void printFailureDetails(INDArray first, INDArray second, RealMatrix expected, INDArray actual,
                    INDArray onCopies, String op) {
        System.out.println("\nFactory: " + Nd4j.factory().getClass() + "\n");

        System.out.println("First:");
              Severity: Major
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
              nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java on lines 362..377

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 119.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                  public static void printFailureDetails(INDArray first, INDArray second, INDArray expected, INDArray actual,
                    INDArray onCopies, String op) {
        System.out.println("\nFactory: " + Nd4j.factory().getClass() + "\n");

        System.out.println("First:");
              Severity: Major
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
              nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java on lines 299..314

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 119.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                              if (relError > maxRelativeDifference && absError > minAbsDifference) {
                    System.out.println("Failure on value: (" + i + "," + j + " exp=" + expOut + ", act=" + actOut
                                    + ", absError=" + absError + ", relError=" + relError);
                    return false;
                }
              Severity: Major
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
              nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java on lines 257..261

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 76.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                              if (relError > maxRelativeDifference && absError > minAbsDifference) {
                    System.out.println("Failure on value: (" + i + "," + j + " exp=" + expOut + ", act=" + actOut
                                    + ", absError=" + absError + ", relError=" + relError);
                    return false;
                }
              Severity: Major
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
              nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java on lines 236..240

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 76.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                      System.out.println("Op: gemm(a,b,c,transposeA=" + transposeA + ",transposeB=" + transposeB + ",alpha=" + alpha
                        + ",beta=" + beta + ")");
              Severity: Minor
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
              nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java on lines 331..332

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 42.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
              Open

                      System.out.println("\nSame Nd4j op on zero offset copies: gemm(aCopy,bCopy,cCopy," + transposeA + ","
                        + transposeB + "," + alpha + "," + beta + ")");
              Severity: Minor
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
              nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/checkutil/CheckUtil.java on lines 320..321

              Duplicated Code

              Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

              Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

              When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

              Tuning

              This issue has a mass of 42.

              We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

              The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

              If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

              See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

              Refactorings

              Further Reading

              There are no issues that match your filters.

              Category
              Status