Sign upLogin

deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j

View on GitHub
Star
nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java

Summary

Maintainability
F
5 days
Test Coverage

File OpProfiler.java has 459 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

/*
 *  ******************************************************************************
 *  *
 *  *
 *  * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the
Severity: Minor
Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 7 hrs to fix

    OpProfiler has 30 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    @Slf4j
@Data
public class OpProfiler {

    public enum PenaltyCause {
    Severity: Minor
    Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 3 hrs to fix

      Method reset has a Cognitive Complexity of 19 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public void reset() {
        invocationsCount.set(0);

        classAggergator.reset();
        longAggergator.reset();
      Severity: Minor
      Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method processOperands has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public PenaltyCause[] processOperands(INDArray x, INDArray y, INDArray z) {
        if (y == null)
            return processOperands(x, z);

        if (x == z || y == z) {
      Severity: Minor
      Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method processOpCall has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public void processOpCall(Op op) {
        // total number of invocations
        invocationsCount.incrementAndGet();

        // number of invocations for this specific op
      Severity: Minor
      Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 2 hrs to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method statsAsString has 48 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public String statsAsString() {
        StringBuffer stringBuffer = new StringBuffer();
        stringBuffer.append("---Total Op Calls: +  invocationsCount.get()\n");
        stringBuffer.append("--- OpClass calls statistics: ---\n");
        stringBuffer.append(classCounter.asString() + "\n");
      Severity: Minor
      Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 1 hr to fix

        Method processOpCall has 43 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            public void processOpCall(Op op) {
        // total number of invocations
        invocationsCount.incrementAndGet();

        // number of invocations for this specific op
        Severity: Minor
        Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 1 hr to fix

          Method processOperands has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              public PenaltyCause[] processOperands(INDArray... operands) {
        if (operands == null)
            return new PenaltyCause[] {NONE};

        List<PenaltyCause> causes = new ArrayList<>();
          Severity: Minor
          Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 1 hr to fix

          Cognitive Complexity

          Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

          A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

          • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
          • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
          • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

          Further reading

          Method processBlasCall has 36 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              public void processBlasCall(boolean isGemm, INDArray... operands) {

        if (isGemm) {
            /**
             * but for gemm we also care about equal orders case: FF, CC
          Severity: Minor
          Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 1 hr to fix

            Method processBlasCall has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public void processBlasCall(boolean isGemm, INDArray... operands) {

        if (isGemm) {
            /**
             * but for gemm we also care about equal orders case: FF, CC
            Severity: Minor
            Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 1 hr to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method processTADOperands has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public PenaltyCause[] processTADOperands(DataBuffer... tadBuffers) {

        List<PenaltyCause> causes = new ArrayList<>();
        for (DataBuffer tadBuffer : tadBuffers) {
            if (tadBuffer == null)
            Severity: Minor
            Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 1 hr to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method getOpClass has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                protected String getOpClass(Op op) {
        if (op instanceof ScalarOp) {
            return "ScalarOp";
        } else if (op instanceof MetaOp) {
            return "MetaOp";
            Severity: Minor
            Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 1 hr to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method processOperands has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public PenaltyCause[] processOperands(INDArray x, INDArray y) {
        List<PenaltyCause> penalties = new ArrayList<>();

        if (x != null && x.ordering() != y.ordering()) {
            penalties.add(PenaltyCause.MIXED_ORDER);
            Severity: Minor
            Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 1 hr to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method joinDistinct has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                protected PenaltyCause[] joinDistinct(PenaltyCause[] a, PenaltyCause[] b) {
        List<PenaltyCause> causes = new ArrayList<>();

        for (PenaltyCause cause : a) {
            if (cause != null && !causes.contains(cause))
            Severity: Minor
            Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 45 mins to fix

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Consider simplifying this complex logical expression.
            Open

                        if ((ews < 1 || rank > 2 || (rank == 2 && tadBuffer.getInt(1) > 1 && tadBuffer.getInt(2) > 1))
                    && !causes.contains(PenaltyCause.TAD_NON_EWS_ACCESS))
                causes.add(PenaltyCause.TAD_NON_EWS_ACCESS);
            else if (ews > 1 && !causes.contains(PenaltyCause.TAD_STRIDED_ACCESS))
                causes.add(PenaltyCause.TAD_STRIDED_ACCESS);
            Severity: Major
            Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 40 mins to fix

              Avoid too many return statements within this method.
              Open

                          return processOperands(x, y);
              Severity: Major
              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 30 mins to fix

                Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                Open

                            return "GridOp";
                Severity: Major
                Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 30 mins to fix

                  Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                  Open

                              return "AccumulationOp";
                  Severity: Major
                  Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 30 mins to fix

                    Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                    Open

                                return "BroadcastOp";
                    Severity: Major
                    Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 30 mins to fix

                      Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                      Open

                                  return "RandomOp";
                      Severity: Major
                      Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 30 mins to fix

                        Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                        Open

                                        return causeXY;
                        Severity: Major
                        Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 30 mins to fix

                          Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                          Open

                                      return "MetaOp";
                          Severity: Major
                          Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 30 mins to fix

                            Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                            Open

                                        return "ScalarOp";
                            Severity: Major
                            Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 30 mins to fix

                              Avoid too many return statements within this method.
                              Open

                                              return "TransformOp";
                              Severity: Major
                              Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java - About 30 mins to fix

                                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                Open

                                    public void timeOpCall(Op op, long startTime) {
        long currentTime = System.nanoTime() - startTime;
        classAggergator.putTime(getOpClass(op), op, currentTime);

        if (currentTime > THRESHOLD) {
                                Severity: Major
                                Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java on lines 370..378

                                Duplicated Code

                                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                Tuning

                                This issue has a mass of 87.

                                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                Refactorings

                                Further Reading

                                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                Open

                                    public void timeOpCall(CustomOp op, long startTime) {
        long currentTime = System.nanoTime() - startTime;
        classAggergator.putTime(getOpClass(op), op, currentTime);

        if (currentTime > THRESHOLD) {
                                Severity: Major
                                Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
                                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java on lines 360..368

                                Duplicated Code

                                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                Tuning

                                This issue has a mass of 87.

                                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                Refactorings

                                Further Reading

                                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                Open

                                        if (x != null && x.elementWiseStride() > 1) {
            penalties.add(PenaltyCause.STRIDED_ACCESS);
        } else if (y != null && y.elementWiseStride() > 1) {
            penalties.add(PenaltyCause.STRIDED_ACCESS);
        }
                                Severity: Minor
                                Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java on lines 580..584

                                Duplicated Code

                                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                Tuning

                                This issue has a mass of 60.

                                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                Refactorings

                                Further Reading

                                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                Open

                                        if (x != null && x.elementWiseStride() < 1) {
            penalties.add(PenaltyCause.NON_EWS_ACCESS);
        } else if (y != null && y.elementWiseStride() < 1) {
            penalties.add(PenaltyCause.NON_EWS_ACCESS);
        }
                                Severity: Minor
                                Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java on lines 586..590

                                Duplicated Code

                                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                Tuning

                                This issue has a mass of 60.

                                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                Refactorings

                                Further Reading

                                Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                Open

                                            for (PenaltyCause cause : causes) {
                switch (cause) {
                    case NON_EWS_ACCESS:
                        nonEwsAggregator.incrementCount();
                        break;
                                Severity: Minor
                                Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java on lines 261..276

                                Duplicated Code

                                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                Tuning

                                This issue has a mass of 58.

                                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                Refactorings

                                Further Reading

                                Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                                Open

                                            for (PenaltyCause cause : causes) {
                switch (cause) {
                    case NON_EWS_ACCESS:
                        nonEwsAggregator.incrementCount();
                        break;
                                Severity: Minor
                                Found in nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
                                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/profiler/OpProfiler.java on lines 553..568

                                Duplicated Code

                                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                                Tuning

                                This issue has a mass of 58.

                                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                                Refactorings

                                Further Reading

                                There are no issues that match your filters.

                                Category
                                Status