deeplearning4j/deeplearning4j

View on GitHub
nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/util/Nd4jValidator.java

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Method validateNumpyTxtFile has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    public static ValidationResult validateNumpyTxtFile(@NonNull File f, @NonNull String delimiter, @NonNull Charset charset) {
        ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "Numpy text file", false);
        if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
            return vr;

    Method validateNumpyTxtFile has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public static ValidationResult validateNumpyTxtFile(@NonNull File f, @NonNull String delimiter, @NonNull Charset charset) {
            ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "Numpy text file", false);
            if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
                return vr;
    
    

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method validateINDArrayFile has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        public static ValidationResult validateINDArrayFile(@NonNull File f, DataType... allowableDataTypes) {
    
            ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "INDArray File", false);
            if (vr != null && !vr.isValid()) {
                vr.setFormatClass(INDArray.class);

      Method validateINDArrayTextFile has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          public static ValidationResult validateINDArrayTextFile(@NonNull File f) {
      
              ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "INDArray Text File", false);
              if (vr != null && !vr.isValid()) {
                  vr.setFormatClass(INDArray.class);

        Method validateSameDiffFlatBuffers has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
        Open

            public static ValidationResult validateSameDiffFlatBuffers(@NonNull File f) {
                ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "SameDiff FlatBuffers file", false);
                if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
                    return vr;
        
        

          Method validateNpzFile has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
          Open

              public static ValidationResult validateNpzFile(@NonNull File f) {
                  ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "Numpy .npz File", false);
                  if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
                      return vr;
          
          

            Method validateNpzFile has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public static ValidationResult validateNpzFile(@NonNull File f) {
                    ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "Numpy .npz File", false);
                    if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
                        return vr;
            
            

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Method validateINDArrayFile has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
            Open

                public static ValidationResult validateINDArrayFile(@NonNull File f, DataType... allowableDataTypes) {
            
                    ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "INDArray File", false);
                    if (vr != null && !vr.isValid()) {
                        vr.setFormatClass(INDArray.class);

            Cognitive Complexity

            Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

            A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

            • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
            • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
            • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

            Further reading

            Avoid too many return statements within this method.
            Open

                    return ValidationResult.builder()
                            .valid(true)
                            .formatType("INDArray File")
                            .formatClass(INDArray.class)
                            .path(Nd4jCommonValidator.getPath(f))

              Avoid too many return statements within this method.
              Open

                      return ValidationResult.builder()
                              .valid(true)
                              .formatType("Numpy text file")
                              .path(Nd4jCommonValidator.getPath(f))
                              .build();

                Method validateINDArrayTextFile has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    public static ValidationResult validateINDArrayTextFile(@NonNull File f) {
                
                        ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "INDArray Text File", false);
                        if (vr != null && !vr.isValid()) {
                            vr.setFormatClass(INDArray.class);

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Method validateNpyFile has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
                Open

                    public static ValidationResult validateNpyFile(@NonNull File f) {
                
                        ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "Numpy .npy File", false);
                        if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
                            return vr;

                Cognitive Complexity

                Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

                A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

                • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
                • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
                • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

                Further reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                        } catch (Throwable t) {
                            if (t instanceof OutOfMemoryError || t.getMessage().toLowerCase().contains("failed to allocate")) {
                                //This is a memory exception during reading... result is indeterminant (might be valid, might not be, can't tell here)
                                return ValidationResult.builder()
                                        .valid(true)
                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/util/Nd4jValidator.java on lines 134..153

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 92.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                        } catch (Throwable t) {
                            if (t instanceof OutOfMemoryError || t.getMessage().toLowerCase().contains("failed to allocate")) {
                                //This is a memory exception during reading... result is indeterminant (might be valid, might not be, can't tell here)
                                return ValidationResult.builder()
                                        .valid(true)
                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/util/Nd4jValidator.java on lines 87..106

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 92.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                        } catch (Throwable t) {
                            return ValidationResult.builder()
                                    .valid(false)
                                    .formatType("SameDiff FlatBuffers file")
                                    .formatClass(SameDiff.class)
                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/util/Nd4jValidator.java on lines 78..87

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 44.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                        } catch (IOException e) {
                            return ValidationResult.builder()
                                    .valid(false)
                                    .formatType("INDArray File")
                                    .formatClass(INDArray.class)
                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/util/Nd4jValidator.java on lines 330..339

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 44.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                        } catch (Throwable t) {
                            return ValidationResult.builder()
                                    .valid(false)
                                    .formatType("Numpy .npz File")
                                    .path(Nd4jCommonValidator.getPath(f))
                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/util/Nd4jValidator.java on lines 258..266

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 40.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
                Open

                        } catch (Throwable t) {
                            return ValidationResult.builder()
                                    .valid(false)
                                    .formatType("Numpy text file")
                                    .path(Nd4jCommonValidator.getPath(f))
                nd4j/nd4j-backends/nd4j-api-parent/nd4j-api/src/main/java/org/nd4j/linalg/util/Nd4jValidator.java on lines 217..225

                Duplicated Code

                Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

                Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

                When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

                Tuning

                This issue has a mass of 40.

                We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

                The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

                If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

                See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

                Refactorings

                Further Reading

                There are no issues that match your filters.

                Category
                Status