Method validateNumpyTxtFile
has 50 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ValidationResult validateNumpyTxtFile(@NonNull File f, @NonNull String delimiter, @NonNull Charset charset) {
ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "Numpy text file", false);
if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
return vr;
Method validateNumpyTxtFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ValidationResult validateNumpyTxtFile(@NonNull File f, @NonNull String delimiter, @NonNull Charset charset) {
ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "Numpy text file", false);
if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
return vr;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validateINDArrayFile
has 42 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ValidationResult validateINDArrayFile(@NonNull File f, DataType... allowableDataTypes) {
ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "INDArray File", false);
if (vr != null && !vr.isValid()) {
vr.setFormatClass(INDArray.class);
Method validateINDArrayTextFile
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ValidationResult validateINDArrayTextFile(@NonNull File f) {
ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "INDArray Text File", false);
if (vr != null && !vr.isValid()) {
vr.setFormatClass(INDArray.class);
Method validateSameDiffFlatBuffers
has 29 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ValidationResult validateSameDiffFlatBuffers(@NonNull File f) {
ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "SameDiff FlatBuffers file", false);
if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
return vr;
Method validateNpzFile
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ValidationResult validateNpzFile(@NonNull File f) {
ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "Numpy .npz File", false);
if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
return vr;
Method validateNpzFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ValidationResult validateNpzFile(@NonNull File f) {
ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "Numpy .npz File", false);
if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
return vr;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validateINDArrayFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ValidationResult validateINDArrayFile(@NonNull File f, DataType... allowableDataTypes) {
ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "INDArray File", false);
if (vr != null && !vr.isValid()) {
vr.setFormatClass(INDArray.class);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return ValidationResult.builder()
.valid(true)
.formatType("INDArray File")
.formatClass(INDArray.class)
.path(Nd4jCommonValidator.getPath(f))
Avoid too many return
statements within this method. Open
return ValidationResult.builder()
.valid(true)
.formatType("Numpy text file")
.path(Nd4jCommonValidator.getPath(f))
.build();
Method validateINDArrayTextFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ValidationResult validateINDArrayTextFile(@NonNull File f) {
ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "INDArray Text File", false);
if (vr != null && !vr.isValid()) {
vr.setFormatClass(INDArray.class);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method validateNpyFile
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public static ValidationResult validateNpyFile(@NonNull File f) {
ValidationResult vr = Nd4jCommonValidator.isValidFile(f, "Numpy .npy File", false);
if (vr != null && !vr.isValid())
return vr;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} catch (Throwable t) {
if (t instanceof OutOfMemoryError || t.getMessage().toLowerCase().contains("failed to allocate")) {
//This is a memory exception during reading... result is indeterminant (might be valid, might not be, can't tell here)
return ValidationResult.builder()
.valid(true)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 92.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} catch (Throwable t) {
if (t instanceof OutOfMemoryError || t.getMessage().toLowerCase().contains("failed to allocate")) {
//This is a memory exception during reading... result is indeterminant (might be valid, might not be, can't tell here)
return ValidationResult.builder()
.valid(true)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 92.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} catch (Throwable t) {
return ValidationResult.builder()
.valid(false)
.formatType("SameDiff FlatBuffers file")
.formatClass(SameDiff.class)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} catch (IOException e) {
return ValidationResult.builder()
.valid(false)
.formatType("INDArray File")
.formatClass(INDArray.class)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 44.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} catch (Throwable t) {
return ValidationResult.builder()
.valid(false)
.formatType("Numpy .npz File")
.path(Nd4jCommonValidator.getPath(f))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
} catch (Throwable t) {
return ValidationResult.builder()
.valid(false)
.formatType("Numpy text file")
.path(Nd4jCommonValidator.getPath(f))
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 40.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76