deliveroo/routemaster-client

View on GitHub

Showing 9 of 9 total issues

Method call has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def call(env)
      catch :forward do
        throw :forward unless _intercept_endpoint?(env)
        return [401, {}, []] unless _has_auth?(env)
        return [403, {}, []] unless _valid_auth?(env)
Severity: Minor
Found in routemaster/receiver.rb - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method _validate_all_options! has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

        def _validate_all_options!
          _assert_present! url: url, uuid: uuid
          _assert_valid_url!(url)
          _assert_valid_uuid!(uuid)
          timeout ? _assert_valid_timeout!(timeout) : self.timeout = DEFAULT_TIMEOUT
Severity: Minor
Found in routemaster/client/configuration.rb - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method _send_event has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

      def _send_event(event, topic, callback, t: nil, async: false, data: nil)
        _assert_valid_url!(callback)
        _assert_valid_topic!(topic)
        _assert_valid_timestamp!(t) if t
        _assert_valid_data(data) if data
Severity: Minor
Found in routemaster/client.rb - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def monitor_topics
        response = _conn.get('/topics')
        raise ConnectionError, "failed to connect to /topics (status: #{response.status})" unless response.success?

        Oj.load(response.body).map do |raw_topic|
Severity: Minor
Found in routemaster/client.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
routemaster/client.rb on lines 115..120

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def monitor_subscriptions
        response = _conn.get('/subscriptions')
        raise ConnectionError, "failed to list subscribers (status: #{response.status})" unless response.success?

        Oj.load(response.body).map do |raw_subscription|
Severity: Minor
Found in routemaster/client.rb and 1 other location - About 15 mins to fix
routemaster/client.rb on lines 106..111

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 26.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def updated(topic, callback, timestamp = nil, t: nil, async: false, data: nil)
        _warn_timestamp_deprecation(timestamp)
        _send_event('update', topic, callback, t: t || timestamp, async: async, data: data)
Severity: Minor
Found in routemaster/client.rb and 3 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
routemaster/client.rb on lines 29..31
routemaster/client.rb on lines 51..53
routemaster/client.rb on lines 62..64

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def noop(topic, callback, timestamp = nil, t: nil, async: false, data: nil)
        _warn_timestamp_deprecation(timestamp)
        _send_event('noop', topic, callback, t: t || timestamp, async: async, data: data)
Severity: Minor
Found in routemaster/client.rb and 3 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
routemaster/client.rb on lines 29..31
routemaster/client.rb on lines 40..42
routemaster/client.rb on lines 51..53

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def created(topic, callback, timestamp = nil, t: nil, async: false, data: nil)
        _warn_timestamp_deprecation(timestamp)
        _send_event('create', topic, callback, t: t || timestamp, async: async, data: data)
Severity: Minor
Found in routemaster/client.rb and 3 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
routemaster/client.rb on lines 40..42
routemaster/client.rb on lines 51..53
routemaster/client.rb on lines 62..64

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Similar blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

      def deleted(topic, callback, timestamp = nil, t: nil, async: false, data: nil)
        _warn_timestamp_deprecation(timestamp)
        _send_event('delete', topic, callback, t: t || timestamp, async: async, data: data)
Severity: Minor
Found in routemaster/client.rb and 3 other locations - About 15 mins to fix
routemaster/client.rb on lines 29..31
routemaster/client.rb on lines 40..42
routemaster/client.rb on lines 62..64

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 25.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language