Showing 227 of 227 total issues
Line is too long. [124/120] Open
tag.span { msg } + tag.button(type: 'button', class: 'btn-close', 'data-bs-dismiss': 'alert', 'aria-label': 'Close')
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks the length of lines in the source code.
The maximum length is configurable.
The tab size is configured in the IndentationWidth
of the Layout/IndentationStyle
cop.
It also ignores a shebang line by default.
This cop has some autocorrection capabilities. It can programmatically shorten certain long lines by inserting line breaks into expressions that can be safely split across lines. These include arrays, hashes, and method calls with argument lists.
If autocorrection is enabled, the following Layout cops are recommended to further format the broken lines. (Many of these are enabled by default.)
- ArgumentAlignment
- ArrayAlignment
- BlockAlignment
- BlockDelimiters
- BlockEndNewline
- ClosingParenthesisIndentation
- FirstArgumentIndentation
- FirstArrayElementIndentation
- FirstHashElementIndentation
- FirstParameterIndentation
- HashAlignment
- IndentationWidth
- MultilineArrayLineBreaks
- MultilineBlockLayout
- MultilineHashBraceLayout
- MultilineHashKeyLineBreaks
- MultilineMethodArgumentLineBreaks
- MultilineMethodParameterLineBreaks
- ParameterAlignment
Together, these cops will pretty print hashes, arrays, method calls, etc. For example, let's say the max columns is 25:
Example:
# bad
{foo: "0000000000", bar: "0000000000", baz: "0000000000"}
# good
{foo: "0000000000",
bar: "0000000000", baz: "0000000000"}
# good (with recommended cops enabled)
{
foo: "0000000000",
bar: "0000000000",
baz: "0000000000",
}
Possible SQL injection Open
scope.order(Arel.sql("#{join_name}.long_text_value") => direction)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Unescaped parameter value Open
<%== pagy_bootstrap_nav(listing.pager) %>
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is #3 on the 2013 [OWASP Top Ten](https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2013-A3-Cross-Site_Scripting_(XSS\)) web security risks and it pops up nearly everywhere.
XSS occurs when a user-controlled value is displayed on a web page without properly escaping it, allowing someone to inject Javascript or HTML into the page which will be interpreted and executed by the browser..
In Rails 2.x, values need to be explicitly escaped (e.g., by using the h
method). Since Rails 3.x, auto-escaping in views is enabled by default. However, one can still use the raw
or html_safe
methods to output a value directly.
See the Ruby Security Guide for more details.
Query Parameters and Cookies
ERB example:
<%= params[:query].html_safe %>
Brakeman looks for several situations that can allow XSS. The simplest is like the example above: a value from the params
or cookies
is being directly output to a view. In such cases, it will issue a warning like:
Unescaped parameter value near line 3: params[:query]
By default, Brakeman will also warn when a parameter or cookie value is used as an argument to a method, the result of which is output unescaped to a view.
For example:
<%= raw some_method(cookie[:name]) %>
This raises a warning like:
Unescaped cookie value near line 5: some_method(cookies[:oreo])
However, the confidence level for this warning will be weak, because it is not directly outputting the cookie value.
Some methods are known to Brakeman to either be dangerous (link_to
is one) or safe (escape_once
). Users can specify safe methods using the --safe-methods
option. Alternatively, Brakeman can be set to only warn when values are used directly with the --report-direct
option.
Model Attributes
Because (many) models come from database values, Brakeman mistrusts them by default.
For example, if @user
is an instance of a model set in an action like
def set_user
@user = User.first
end
and there is a view with
<%= @user.name.html_safe %>
Brakeman will raise a warning like
Unescaped model attribute near line 3: User.first.name
If you trust all your data (although you probably shouldn't), this can be disabled with --ignore-model-output
.
Possible SQL injection Open
scope.order(Arel.sql("#{join_name}.question_option_id") => direction)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Possible SQL injection Open
scope.order(Arel.sql("#{join_name}.boolean_value") => direction)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Possible SQL injection Open
scope.order(Arel.sql("#{join_name}.time_value") => direction)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Possible SQL injection Open
scope.order(Arel.sql("#{join_name}.float_value") => direction)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Block has too many lines. [27/25] Open
guard :rspec, cmd: "bundle exec rspec" do
require "guard/rspec/dsl"
dsl = Guard::RSpec::Dsl.new(self)
# Feel free to open issues for suggestions and improvements
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.
You can set constructs you want to fold with CountAsOne
.
Available are: 'array', 'hash', 'heredoc', and 'method_call'. Each construct
will be counted as one line regardless of its actual size.
NOTE: The ExcludedMethods
configuration is deprecated and only kept
for backwards compatibility. Please use AllowedMethods
and AllowedPatterns
instead. By default, there are no methods to allowed.
Example: CountAsOne: ['array', 'heredoc', 'method_call']
something do
array = [ # +1
1,
2
]
hash = { # +3
key: 'value'
}
msg = <<~HEREDOC # +1
Heredoc
content.
HEREDOC
foo( # +1
1,
2
)
end # 6 points
NOTE: This cop does not apply for Struct
definitions.
Possible SQL injection Open
scope.order(Arel.sql("#{join_name}.date_value") => direction, Arel.sql("#{join_name}.time_value") => direction)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Possible SQL injection Open
scope.order(Arel.sql("#{join_name}.date_value") => direction)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Unescaped parameter value Open
<%== survey_qrcode(survey, format: :svg, module_size: 15) %>
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Cross-site scripting (or XSS) is #3 on the 2013 [OWASP Top Ten](https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Top_10_2013-A3-Cross-Site_Scripting_(XSS\)) web security risks and it pops up nearly everywhere.
XSS occurs when a user-controlled value is displayed on a web page without properly escaping it, allowing someone to inject Javascript or HTML into the page which will be interpreted and executed by the browser..
In Rails 2.x, values need to be explicitly escaped (e.g., by using the h
method). Since Rails 3.x, auto-escaping in views is enabled by default. However, one can still use the raw
or html_safe
methods to output a value directly.
See the Ruby Security Guide for more details.
Query Parameters and Cookies
ERB example:
<%= params[:query].html_safe %>
Brakeman looks for several situations that can allow XSS. The simplest is like the example above: a value from the params
or cookies
is being directly output to a view. In such cases, it will issue a warning like:
Unescaped parameter value near line 3: params[:query]
By default, Brakeman will also warn when a parameter or cookie value is used as an argument to a method, the result of which is output unescaped to a view.
For example:
<%= raw some_method(cookie[:name]) %>
This raises a warning like:
Unescaped cookie value near line 5: some_method(cookies[:oreo])
However, the confidence level for this warning will be weak, because it is not directly outputting the cookie value.
Some methods are known to Brakeman to either be dangerous (link_to
is one) or safe (escape_once
). Users can specify safe methods using the --safe-methods
option. Alternatively, Brakeman can be set to only warn when values are used directly with the --report-direct
option.
Model Attributes
Because (many) models come from database values, Brakeman mistrusts them by default.
For example, if @user
is an instance of a model set in an action like
def set_user
@user = User.first
end
and there is a view with
<%= @user.name.html_safe %>
Brakeman will raise a warning like
Unescaped model attribute near line 3: User.first.name
If you trust all your data (although you probably shouldn't), this can be disabled with --ignore-model-output
.
Possible SQL injection Open
scope.order(Arel.sql("#{join_name}.integer_value") => direction)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Possible SQL injection Open
scope.order(Arel.sql("#{join_name}.short_text_value") => direction)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Injection is #1 on the 2013 OWASP Top Ten web security risks. SQL injection is when a user is able to manipulate a value which is used unsafely inside a SQL query. This can lead to data leaks, data loss, elevation of privilege, and other unpleasant outcomes.
Brakeman focuses on ActiveRecord methods dealing with building SQL statements.
A basic (Rails 2.x) example looks like this:
User.first(:conditions => "username = '#{params[:username]}'")
Brakeman would produce a warning like this:
Possible SQL injection near line 30: User.first(:conditions => ("username = '#{params[:username]}'"))
The safe way to do this query is to use a parameterized query:
User.first(:conditions => ["username = ?", params[:username]])
Brakeman also understands the new Rails 3.x way of doing things (and local variables and concatenation):
username = params[:user][:name].downcase
password = params[:user][:password]
User.first.where("username = '" + username + "' AND password = '" + password + "'")
This results in this kind of warning:
Possible SQL injection near line 37:
User.first.where((((("username = '" + params[:user][:name].downcase) + "' AND password = '") + params[:user][:password]) + "'"))
See the Ruby Security Guide for more information and Rails-SQLi.org for many examples of SQL injection in Rails.
Method call
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def call(user:, visit:, tracker:, wants_preview:)
fail! error: format(SUBMITTED_ERROR, survey.name.inspect) if already_submitted?(visit, wants_preview)
fail! error: PERMISSION_ERROR unless user.can_create_reply?(survey)
if user.can_preview_survey?(survey, wants_preview: wants_preview)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method button_to
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def button_to(name = nil, options = nil, html_options = EMPTY_HASH, &block)
htmx_attr_keys = options.is_a?(Hash) ? HTMX_ONLY_ATTRS & options.keys : EMPTY_ARRAY
return orig_button_to(name, options, html_options, &block) if htmx_attr_keys.empty?
html_options, options = options, name if block_given?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method survey_open_indicator
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def survey_open_indicator(survey)
htmx = {
'hx-post' => survey.open? ? survey_close_path(survey) : survey_open_path(survey),
'hx-vals' => { authenticity_token: authenticity_token }.to_json,
'hx-target' => "#survey-card-#{survey.id}",
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method nav_link
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def nav_link(content, path = nil, active:, **html_options)
classes = %w[nav-link]
unless path
path = content
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Line is too long. [121/120] Open
has_one :reply, class_name: 'Dragnet::Reply', foreign_key: :ahoy_visit_id, inverse_of: :ahoy_visit, dependent: :nullify
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks the length of lines in the source code.
The maximum length is configurable.
The tab size is configured in the IndentationWidth
of the Layout/IndentationStyle
cop.
It also ignores a shebang line by default.
This cop has some autocorrection capabilities. It can programmatically shorten certain long lines by inserting line breaks into expressions that can be safely split across lines. These include arrays, hashes, and method calls with argument lists.
If autocorrection is enabled, the following Layout cops are recommended to further format the broken lines. (Many of these are enabled by default.)
- ArgumentAlignment
- ArrayAlignment
- BlockAlignment
- BlockDelimiters
- BlockEndNewline
- ClosingParenthesisIndentation
- FirstArgumentIndentation
- FirstArrayElementIndentation
- FirstHashElementIndentation
- FirstParameterIndentation
- HashAlignment
- IndentationWidth
- MultilineArrayLineBreaks
- MultilineBlockLayout
- MultilineHashBraceLayout
- MultilineHashKeyLineBreaks
- MultilineMethodArgumentLineBreaks
- MultilineMethodParameterLineBreaks
- ParameterAlignment
Together, these cops will pretty print hashes, arrays, method calls, etc. For example, let's say the max columns is 25:
Example:
# bad
{foo: "0000000000", bar: "0000000000", baz: "0000000000"}
# good
{foo: "0000000000",
bar: "0000000000", baz: "0000000000"}
# good (with recommended cops enabled)
{
foo: "0000000000",
bar: "0000000000",
baz: "0000000000",
}
Line is too long. [121/120] Open
has_many :copies, foreign_key: 'copy_of_id', class_name: 'Dragnet::Survey', dependent: :nullify, inverse_of: :copy_of
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Checks the length of lines in the source code.
The maximum length is configurable.
The tab size is configured in the IndentationWidth
of the Layout/IndentationStyle
cop.
It also ignores a shebang line by default.
This cop has some autocorrection capabilities. It can programmatically shorten certain long lines by inserting line breaks into expressions that can be safely split across lines. These include arrays, hashes, and method calls with argument lists.
If autocorrection is enabled, the following Layout cops are recommended to further format the broken lines. (Many of these are enabled by default.)
- ArgumentAlignment
- ArrayAlignment
- BlockAlignment
- BlockDelimiters
- BlockEndNewline
- ClosingParenthesisIndentation
- FirstArgumentIndentation
- FirstArrayElementIndentation
- FirstHashElementIndentation
- FirstParameterIndentation
- HashAlignment
- IndentationWidth
- MultilineArrayLineBreaks
- MultilineBlockLayout
- MultilineHashBraceLayout
- MultilineHashKeyLineBreaks
- MultilineMethodArgumentLineBreaks
- MultilineMethodParameterLineBreaks
- ParameterAlignment
Together, these cops will pretty print hashes, arrays, method calls, etc. For example, let's say the max columns is 25:
Example:
# bad
{foo: "0000000000", bar: "0000000000", baz: "0000000000"}
# good
{foo: "0000000000",
bar: "0000000000", baz: "0000000000"}
# good (with recommended cops enabled)
{
foo: "0000000000",
bar: "0000000000",
baz: "0000000000",
}
Method data_grid_display
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def data_grid_display(answers, question, alt: '-')
return alt if answers.blank?
tag.div(class: 'text-nowrap text-end') do
answers.map do |answer|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"