Sign upLogin

dgroup/lazylead

View on GitHub
Star

Showing 15 of 15 total issues

Class Issue has 26 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  class Issue
    def initialize(issue, jira)
      @issue = issue
      @jira = jira
    end
Severity: Minor
Found in lib/lazylead/system/jira.rb - About 3 hrs to fix

    File jira.rb has 252 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    require "jira-ruby"
require "forwardable"
require_relative "../salt"
require_relative "../opts"
require_relative "../log"
    Severity: Minor
    Found in lib/lazylead/system/jira.rb - About 2 hrs to fix

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          class Assignment
      def initialize(log = Log.new)
        @log = log
      end
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/lazylead/task/assignment.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      lib/lazylead/task/fix_version.rb on lines 34..47

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 56.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          class FixVersion
      def initialize(log = Log.new)
        @log = log
      end
      Severity: Major
      Found in lib/lazylead/task/fix_version.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
      lib/lazylead/task/assignment.rb on lines 38..51

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 56.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Method diff has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def diff(expected, actual)
        diff = {}
        actual.each_with_object(diff) do |a, d|
          k = a.first
          v = a.last
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/task/propagate_down.rb - About 55 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method pairs has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def pairs(words, text)
      snippets = [[]]
      words.each_with_index do |e, i|
        next unless e.start_with? text
        pair = snippets.last
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/task/accuracy/stacktrace.rb - About 55 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method exec has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def exec
        retries ||= 0
        @orig.exec
        @orig
      rescue StandardError => e
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/model.rb - About 55 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method exec has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def exec
        Logging.mdc["tid"] = "task #{id}"
        @log.debug "'#{name}' is started."
        @log.warn "No postman, stub is used." unless props.key? "postman"
        @log.warn "No team." if team.nil?
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/model.rb - About 45 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def detect_er(index, src, strip)
      return unless @er.negative? && index > @tc
      keywords = %w[er: expectedresult: er= [er] expectedresult]
      @er = index if keywords.any? { |k| strip.start_with? k }
      @er = index if keywords.any? { |k| src.include? k }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/task/accuracy/testcase.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
      lib/lazylead/task/accuracy/testcase.rb on lines 81..85

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 37.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def detect_ar(index, src, strip)
      return unless @ar.negative? && index > @tc
      keywords = %w[ar: actualresult: ar= [ar] actualresult]
      @ar = index if keywords.any? { |k| strip.start_with? k }
      @ar = index if keywords.any? { |k| src.include? k }
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/task/accuracy/testcase.rb and 1 other location - About 40 mins to fix
      lib/lazylead/task/accuracy/testcase.rb on lines 92..96

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 37.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          class AssigneeAlert
      def initialize(log = Log.new)
        @log = log
      end
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/task/alert/alert.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
      lib/lazylead/task/alert/alert.rb on lines 93..102

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 36.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
      Open

          class ReporterAlert
      def initialize(log = Log.new)
        @log = log
      end
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/task/alert/alert.rb and 1 other location - About 35 mins to fix
      lib/lazylead/task/alert/alert.rb on lines 68..77

      Duplicated Code

      Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

      Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

      When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

      Tuning

      This issue has a mass of 36.

      We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

      The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

      If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

      See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

      Refactorings

      Further Reading

      Method schedule_tasks has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

            def schedule_tasks
        todo = ORM::Task.where(enabled: "true")
        if todo.empty?
          @log.warn "ll-001: No tasks found."
        else
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/cli/app.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method sliced has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def sliced(delim, *keys)
      return [] if keys.empty?
      key = keys.detect { |k| key? k }
      val = to_h[key]
      return [] if val.nil? || val.blank?
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/opts.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Method fields has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
      Open

          def fields
      return {} if @issue.nil?
      return {} unless @issue.respond_to? :fields
      return {} if @issue.fields.nil?
      return {} unless @issue.fields.respond_to? :[]
      Severity: Minor
      Found in lib/lazylead/system/jira.rb - About 25 mins to fix

      Cognitive Complexity

      Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

      A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

      • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
      • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
      • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

      Further reading

      Severity
      Category
      Status
      Source
      Language