digidotcom/python-suitcase

View on GitHub
suitcase/structure.py

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Function unpack_stream has a Cognitive Complexity of 42 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

    def unpack_stream(self, stream):
        # type: (BytesIO) -> None
        """Unpack bytes from a stream of data field-by-field

        In the most basic case, the basic algorithm here is as follows::
Severity: Minor
Found in suitcase/structure.py - About 6 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

File structure.py has 282 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

# This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
# License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was not distributed with this
# file, You can obtain one at http://mozilla.org/MPL/2.0/.
#
# Copyright (c) 2019 Digi International Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Severity: Minor
Found in suitcase/structure.py - About 2 hrs to fix

    Function write has a Cognitive Complexity of 11 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def write(self, stream):
            # type: (BytesIO) -> None
            # now, pack everything in
            crc_fields = []
            for name, field in self.ordered_fields:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in suitcase/structure.py - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function __new__ has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

        def __new__(cls, name, bases, dct):
            #  find all the placeholders in this class declaration and store
            # them away.  Add name mangling to the original fields so they
            # do not get in the way.
            dct['_field_placeholders'] = {}
    Severity: Minor
    Found in suitcase/structure.py - About 55 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                    try:
                        field.unpack(data)
                    except SuitcaseException:
                        raise  # just re-raise these
                    except Exception:
    Severity: Major
    Found in suitcase/structure.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
    suitcase/structure.py on lines 38..53
    suitcase/structure.py on lines 131..140

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 61.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                try:
                    if isinstance(field, CRCField):
                        crc_offset = stream.tell()
                        field.pack(stream)
                        crc_fields.append((field, crc_offset))
    Severity: Major
    Found in suitcase/structure.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
    suitcase/structure.py on lines 131..140
    suitcase/structure.py on lines 168..176

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 61.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

                try:
                    unused_data = field.unpack(data)
                    stream.seek(-len(unused_data or b""), os.SEEK_CUR)
                except SuitcaseException:
                    raise  # just re-raise these
    Severity: Major
    Found in suitcase/structure.py and 2 other locations - About 2 hrs to fix
    suitcase/structure.py on lines 38..53
    suitcase/structure.py on lines 168..176

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 61.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status