Showing 1,412 of 1,855 total issues
Method Info.ExtraAttributes
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (info *Info) ExtraAttributes(keyMod func(string) string) (map[string]string, error) {
extra := make(map[string]string)
labels, ok := info.Config["labels"]
if ok && len(labels) > 0 {
for _, l := range strings.Split(labels, ",") {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method tarSum.Read
has a Cognitive Complexity of 51 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (ts *tarSum) Read(buf []byte) (int, error) {
if ts.finished {
return ts.bufWriter.Read(buf)
}
if len(ts.bufData) < len(buf) {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method EndpointRecord.Unmarshal
has 61 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (m *EndpointRecord) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method Config.CopyStreams
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (c *Config) CopyStreams(ctx context.Context, cfg *AttachConfig) <-chan error {
var group errgroup.Group
// Connect stdin of container to the attach stdin stream.
if cfg.Stdin != nil {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method linuxParser.validateMountConfigImpl
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *linuxParser) validateMountConfigImpl(mnt *mount.Mount, validateBindSourceExists bool) error {
if len(mnt.Target) == 0 {
return &errMountConfig{mnt, errMissingField("Target")}
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Daemon.ProcessEvent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 50 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) ProcessEvent(id string, e libcontainerdtypes.EventType, ei libcontainerdtypes.EventInfo) error {
c, err := daemon.GetContainer(id)
if err != nil {
return errors.Wrapf(err, "could not find container %s", id)
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Controller
has 39 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
type Controller struct {
id string
drvRegistry drvregistry.Networks
ipamRegistry drvregistry.IPAMs
sandboxes map[string]*Sandbox
File layer_store.go
has 630 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package layer // import "github.com/docker/docker/layer"
import (
"context"
"errors"
Method PortMapper.MapRange
has a Cognitive Complexity of 49 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (pm *PortMapper) MapRange(container net.Addr, hostIP net.IP, hostPortStart, hostPortEnd int, useProxy bool) (host net.Addr, retErr error) {
pm.lock.Lock()
defer pm.lock.Unlock()
var (
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function withMounts
has 152 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func withMounts(daemon *Daemon, daemonCfg *configStore, c *container.Container, ms []container.Mount) coci.SpecOpts {
return func(ctx context.Context, _ coci.Client, _ *containers.Container, s *coci.Spec) (err error) {
sort.Sort(mounts(ms))
mounts := ms
Method NetworkEntry.Unmarshal
has 150 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *NetworkEntry) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method NetworkEvent.Unmarshal
has 149 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (m *NetworkEvent) Unmarshal(dAtA []byte) error {
l := len(dAtA)
iNdEx := 0
for iNdEx < l {
preIndex := iNdEx
Method containerRouter.postContainersCreate
has 149 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (s *containerRouter) postContainersCreate(ctx context.Context, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, vars map[string]string) error {
if err := httputils.ParseForm(r); err != nil {
return err
}
if err := httputils.CheckForJSON(r); err != nil {
File client.go
has 623 lines of code (exceeds 500 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package remote // import "github.com/docker/docker/libcontainerd/remote"
import (
"context"
"encoding/json"
Method layerDescriptor.Download
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (ld *layerDescriptor) Download(ctx context.Context, progressOutput progress.Output) (io.ReadCloser, int64, error) {
log.G(ctx).Debugf("pulling blob %q", ld.digest)
var (
err error
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method puller.pullTag
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (p *puller) pullTag(ctx context.Context, ref reference.Named, platform *ocispec.Platform) (tagUpdated bool, err error) {
var (
tagOrDigest string // Used for logging/progress only
dgst digest.Digest
mt string
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method driver.CreateEndpoint
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (d *driver) CreateEndpoint(nid, eid string, ifInfo driverapi.InterfaceInfo, epOptions map[string]interface{}) error {
if ifInfo == nil {
return errors.New("invalid interface info passed")
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method imageRouter.postImagesCreate
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (ir *imageRouter) postImagesCreate(ctx context.Context, w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request, vars map[string]string) error {
if err := httputils.ParseForm(r); err != nil {
return err
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Daemon.ContainerLogs
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (daemon *Daemon) ContainerLogs(ctx context.Context, containerName string, config *containertypes.LogsOptions) (messages <-chan *backend.LogMessage, isTTY bool, retErr error) {
lg := log.G(ctx).WithFields(log.Fields{
"module": "daemon",
"method": "(*Daemon).ContainerLogs",
"container": containerName,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function containerToGRPC
has a Cognitive Complexity of 48 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func containerToGRPC(c *types.ContainerSpec) (*swarmapi.ContainerSpec, error) {
containerSpec := &swarmapi.ContainerSpec{
Image: c.Image,
Labels: c.Labels,
Command: c.Command,
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"