Method Supervisor.shouldRestart
has a Cognitive Complexity of 34 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *Supervisor) shouldRestart(ctx context.Context, t *api.Task, service *api.Service) bool {
// TODO(aluzzardi): This function should not depend on `service`.
// There are 3 possible restart policies.
switch orchestrator.RestartCondition(t) {
case api.RestartOnAny:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Supervisor.shouldRestart
has 76 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *Supervisor) shouldRestart(ctx context.Context, t *api.Task, service *api.Service) bool {
// TODO(aluzzardi): This function should not depend on `service`.
// There are 3 possible restart policies.
switch orchestrator.RestartCondition(t) {
case api.RestartOnAny:
Method Supervisor.DelayStart
has 72 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *Supervisor) DelayStart(ctx context.Context, _ store.Tx, oldTask *api.Task, newTaskID string, delay time.Duration, waitStop bool) <-chan struct{} {
ctx, cancel := context.WithCancel(context.Background())
doneCh := make(chan struct{})
r.mu.Lock()
Method Supervisor.Restart
has 68 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *Supervisor) Restart(ctx context.Context, tx store.Tx, cluster *api.Cluster, service *api.Service, t api.Task) error {
// TODO(aluzzardi): This function should not depend on `service`.
// Is the old task still in the process of restarting? If so, wait for
// its restart delay to elapse, to avoid tight restart loops (for
Method Supervisor.Restart
has a Cognitive Complexity of 26 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *Supervisor) Restart(ctx context.Context, tx store.Tx, cluster *api.Cluster, service *api.Service, t api.Task) error {
// TODO(aluzzardi): This function should not depend on `service`.
// Is the old task still in the process of restarting? If so, wait for
// its restart delay to elapse, to avoid tight restart loops (for
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Supervisor.shouldRestart
has 10 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (r *Supervisor) shouldRestart(ctx context.Context, t *api.Task, service *api.Service) bool {
// TODO(aluzzardi): This function should not depend on `service`.
// There are 3 possible restart policies.
switch orchestrator.RestartCondition(t) {
case api.RestartOnAny:
Method Supervisor.DelayStart
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *Supervisor) DelayStart(ctx context.Context, _ store.Tx, oldTask *api.Task, newTaskID string, delay time.Duration, waitStop bool) <-chan struct{} {
Method Supervisor.Restart
has 7 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (r *Supervisor) Restart(ctx context.Context, tx store.Tx, cluster *api.Cluster, service *api.Service, t api.Task) error {
// TODO(aluzzardi): This function should not depend on `service`.
// Is the old task still in the process of restarting? If so, wait for
// its restart delay to elapse, to avoid tight restart loops (for
Method Supervisor.Restart
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
func (r *Supervisor) Restart(ctx context.Context, tx store.Tx, cluster *api.Cluster, service *api.Service, t api.Task) error {
Method Supervisor.waitRestart
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (r *Supervisor) waitRestart(ctx context.Context, oldDelay *delayedStart, cluster *api.Cluster, taskID string) {
// Wait for the last restart delay to elapse.
select {
case <-oldDelay.doneCh:
case <-ctx.Done():
Method Supervisor.UpdatableTasksInSlot
has 5 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
func (r *Supervisor) UpdatableTasksInSlot(ctx context.Context, slot orchestrator.Slot, service *api.Service) orchestrator.Slot {
if len(slot) < 1 {
return nil
}
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
if t.Spec.Restart != nil && t.Spec.Restart.Delay != nil {
var err error
restartDelay, err = gogotypes.DurationFromProto(t.Spec.Restart.Delay)
if err != nil {
log.G(ctx).WithError(err).Error("invalid restart delay; using default")
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 105.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76