benchmark/benchmark.txt
Ruby (programming language)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Not to be confused with Ruby on Rails.
Ruby
Paradigm(s) multi-paradigm: object-oriented, imperative, functional, reflective
Appeared in 1995
Designed by Yukihiro Matsumoto
Developer Yukihiro Matsumoto, et al.
Stable release 2.0.0-p0 (February 24, 2013; 38 days ago)
Typing discipline duck, dynamic
Scope lexical, sometimes dynamic
Major implementations Ruby MRI, YARV, Rubinius, MagLev JRuby, MacRuby, RubyMotion, HotRuby, IronRuby, mruby
Influenced by Ada,[1] C++,[1] CLU,[2] Dylan,[2] Eiffel,[1] Lisp,[2] Perl,[2] Python,[2] Smalltalk[2]
Influenced Falcon, Fancy,[3] Groovy, Ioke,[4] Mirah, Nu,[5] Reia
OS Cross-platform
License Ruby License or BSD License[6][7]
Usual filename extensions .rb, .rbw
www.ruby-lang.org Ruby Programming at Wikibooks
Ruby is a dynamic, reflective, general-purpose object-oriented programming language that combines syntax inspired by Perl with Smalltalk-like features. It was also influenced by Eiffel and Lisp.[8] Ruby was first designed and developed in the mid-1990s by Yukihiro "Matz" Matsumoto in Japan.
Ruby supports multiple programming paradigms, including functional, object oriented and imperative. It also has a dynamic type system and automatic memory management; it is therefore similar in varying respects to Smalltalk, Python, Perl, Lisp, Dylan, Pike, and CLU.
The standard 1.8.7 implementation is written in C, as a single-pass interpreted language. Starting with the 1.9 branch, and continuing with the current 2.0 branch, YARV has been used, and will eventually supersede the slower Ruby MRI. The language specifications for Ruby were developed by the Open Standards Promotion Center of the Information-Technology Promotion Agency (a Japanese government agency) for submission to the Japanese Industrial Standards Committee and then to the International Organization for Standardization. It was accepted as a Japanese Industrial Standard (JIS X 3017) in 2011[9] and an international standard (ISO/IEC 30170) in 2012.[10] As of 2010, there are a number of complete or upcoming alternative implementations of Ruby, including YARV, JRuby, Rubinius, IronRuby, MacRuby (and its iOS counterpart, RubyMotion), mruby, and HotRuby. Each takes a different approach, with IronRuby, JRuby, MacRuby and Rubinius providing just-in-time compilation and MacRuby and mruby also providing ahead-of-time compilation.
Contents [hide]
1 History
1.1 Choice of the name "Ruby"
1.2 First publication
1.3 Ruby 1.0
1.4 Ruby 1.2
1.5 Ruby 1.4
1.6 Ruby 1.6
1.7 Ruby 1.8
1.8 Ruby on Rails
1.9 Ruby 1.9
1.10 Ruby 2.0
2 Philosophy
3 Features
4 Semantics
5 Syntax
6 Deviations from behavior elsewhere
7 Interaction
8 Examples
8.1 Strings
8.2 Collections
8.3 Blocks and iterators
8.4 Classes
8.4.1 Open classes
8.5 Exceptions
8.6 Metaprogramming
8.7 More examples
9 Implementations
10 Repositories and libraries
11 See also
12 References
13 Further reading
14 External links
[edit]History
Ruby was conceived on February 24, 1993 by Yukihiro Matsumoto who wished to create a new language that balanced functional programming with imperative programming.[11] Matsumoto has said, "I wanted a scripting language that was more powerful than Perl, and more object-oriented than Python. That's why I decided to design my own language."[12]
At a Google Tech Talk in 2008 Matsumoto further stated, "I hope to see Ruby help every programmer in the world to be productive, and to enjoy programming, and to be happy. That is the primary purpose of Ruby language."[13]
[edit]Choice of the name "Ruby"
The name "Ruby" originated during an online chat session between Matsumoto and Keiju Ishitsuka on February 24, 1993, before any code had been written for the language.[14] Initially two names were proposed: "Coral" and "Ruby". Matsumoto chose the latter in a later email to Ishitsuka.[15] Matsumoto later noted a factor in choosing the name "Ruby" - it was the birthstone of one of his colleagues.[16][17]
[edit]First publication
The first public release of Ruby 0.95 was announced on Japanese domestic newsgroups on December 21, 1995.[18][19] Subsequently three more versions of Ruby were released in two days.[14] The release coincided with the launch of the Japanese-language ruby-list mailing list, which was the first mailing list for the new language.
Already present at this stage of development were many of the features familiar in later releases of Ruby, including object-oriented design, classes with inheritance, mixins, iterators, closures, exception handling and garbage collection.[20]
[edit]Ruby 1.0
Ruby reached version 1.0 on December 25, 1996.[14]
Following the release of Ruby 1.3 in 1999 the first English language mailing list ruby-talk began,[12] which signalled a growing interest in the language outside of Japan. In September 2000, the first English language book Programming Ruby was printed, which was later freely released to the public, further widening the adoption of Ruby amongst English speakers.
This section requires expansion with: history and new features for pre-1.9 versions. (May 2012)
[edit]Ruby 1.2
Ruby 1.2 was initially released in December 1998.
[edit]Ruby 1.4
Ruby 1.4 was initially released in August 1999.
[edit]Ruby 1.6
Ruby 1.6 was initially released in September 2000.
[edit]Ruby 1.8
Ruby 1.8 was initially released in August 2003, and was stable for a long time. Although deprecated, there is still code based on it. Ruby 1.8 is incompatible with Ruby 1.9.
[edit]Ruby on Rails
Around 2005, interest in the Ruby language surged in tandem with Ruby on Rails, a popular web application framework written in Ruby. Rails is frequently credited with making Ruby "famous".[21]
[edit]Ruby 1.9
Ruby 1.9 was released in December 2007. Effective with Ruby 1.9.3, released October 31, 2011,[22] Ruby switched from being dual-licensed under the Ruby License and the GPL to being dual-licensed under the Ruby License and the two-clause BSD license.[23] Adoption of 1.9 was slowed by changes from 1.8 which required many popular third party gems to be rewritten.
Ruby 1.9 introduces many significant changes over the 1.8 series.[24] Examples:
Block local variables (variables that are local to the block in which they are declared)
An additional lambda syntax (f = ->(a,b) { puts a + b })
Per-string character encodings are supported
New socket API (IPv6 support)
require_relative import security
[edit]Ruby 2.0
Ruby 2.0 added several new features, including:
keyword arguments,functional
a new method – Module#prepend – for extending a class,
a new literal for creating an array of symbols,
new API for the lazy evaluation of Enumerables, and
a new convention of using #to_h to convert objects to Hashes.[25]
Ruby 2.0 is intended to be fully backward compatible with Ruby 1.9.3. As of the official 2.0.0 release on February 24, 2013, there were only five known (minor) incompatibilities.[26]
[edit]Philosophy
Matsumoto has said that Ruby is designed for programmer productivity and fun, following the principles of good user interface design.[27] He stresses that systems design needs to emphasize human, rather than computer, needs:[28]
Often people, especially computer engineers, focus on the machines. They think, "By doing this, the machine will run faster. By doing this, the machine will run more effectively. By doing this, the machine will something something something." They are focusing on machines. But in fact we need to focus on humans, on how humans care about doing programming or operating the application of the machines. We are the masters. They are the slaves.
Ruby is said to follow the principle of least astonishment (POLA), meaning that the language should behave in such a way as to minimize confusion for experienced users. Matsumoto has said his primary design goal was to make a language which he himself enjoyed using, by minimizing programmer work and possible confusion. He has said that he had not applied the principle of least surprise to the design of Ruby,[28] but nevertheless the phrase has come to be closely associated with the Ruby programming language. The phrase has itself been a source of surprise, as novice users may take it to mean that Ruby's behaviors try to closely match behaviors familiar from other languages. In a May 2005, discussion on the newsgroup comp.lang.ruby, Matsumoto attempted to distance Ruby from POLA, explaining that because any design choice will be surprising to someone, he uses a personal standard in evaluating surprise. If that personal standard remains consistent, there would be few surprises for those familiar with the standard.[29]
Matsumoto defined it this way in an interview:[28]
Everyone has an individual background. Someone may come from Python, someone else may come from Perl, and they may be surprised by different aspects of the language. Then they come up to me and say, 'I was surprised by this feature of the language, so Ruby violates the principle of least surprise.' Wait. Wait. The principle of least surprise is not for you only. The principle of least surprise means principle of least my surprise [sic]. And it means the principle of least surprise after you learn Ruby very well. For example, I was a C++ programmer before I started designing Ruby. I programmed in C++ exclusively for two or three years. And after two years of C++ programming, it still surprises me.
[edit]Features
Thoroughly object-oriented with inheritance, mixins and metaclasses[30]
Dynamic typing and duck typing
Everything is an expression (even statements) and everything is executed imperatively (even declarations)
Succinct and flexible syntax[31] that minimizes syntactic noise and serves as a foundation for domain-specific languages[32]
Dynamic reflection and alteration of objects to facilitate metaprogramming[33]
Lexical closures, iterators and generators, with a unique block syntax[34]
Literal notation for arrays, hashes, regular expressions and symbols
Embedding code in strings (interpolation)
Default arguments
Four levels of variable scope (global, class, instance, and local) denoted by sigils or the lack thereof
Garbage collection
First-class continuations
Strict boolean coercion rules (everything is true except false and nil)
Exception handling
Operator overloading
Built-in support for rational numbers, complex numbers and arbitrary-precision arithmetic
Custom dispatch behavior (through method_missing and const_missing)
Native threads and cooperative fibers (fibers are 1.9/YARV feature)
Initial support for Unicode and multiple character encodings (no ICU support)[35]
Native plug-in API in C
Interactive Ruby Shell (a REPL)
Centralized package management through RubyGems
Implemented on all major platforms
Large standard library
[edit]Semantics
Ruby is object-oriented: every value is an object, including classes and instances of types that many other languages designate as primitives (such as integers, booleans, and "null"). Variables always hold references to objects. Every function is a method and methods are always called on an object. Methods defined at the top level scope become members of the Object class. Since this class is an ancestor of every other class, such methods can be called on any object. They are also visible in all scopes, effectively serving as "global" procedures. Ruby supports inheritance with dynamic dispatch, mixins and singleton methods (belonging to, and defined for, a single instance rather than being defined on the class). Though Ruby does not support multiple inheritance, classes can import modules as mixins.
Ruby has been described as a multi-paradigm programming language: it allows procedural programming (defining functions/variables outside classes makes them part of the root, 'self' Object), with object orientation (everything is an object) or functional programming (it has anonymous functions, closures, and continuations; statements all have values, and functions return the last evaluation). It has support for introspection, reflection and metaprogramming, as well as support for interpreter-based[36] threads. Ruby features dynamic typing, and supports parametric polymorphism.
According to the Ruby FAQ,[37] "If you like Perl, you will like Ruby and be right at home with its syntax. If you like Smalltalk, you will like Ruby and be right at home with its semantics. If you like Python, you may or may not be put off by the huge difference in design philosophy between Python and Ruby/Perl."
[edit]Syntax
The syntax of Ruby is broadly similar to Perl and Python. Class and method definitions are signaled by keywords. In contrast to Perl, variables are not obligatorily prefixed with a sigil. When used, the sigil changes the semantics of scope of the variable. One difference from C and Perl is that keywords are typically used to define logical code blocks, without braces (i.e., pair of { and }). For practical purposes there is no distinction between expressions and statements.[38] Line breaks are significant and taken as the end of a statement; a semicolon may be equivalently used. Unlike Python, indentation is not significant.
One of the differences of Ruby compared to Python and Perl is that Ruby keeps all of its instance variables completely private to the class and only exposes them through accessor methods (attr_writer, attr_reader, etc.). Unlike the "getter" and "setter" methods of other languages like C++ or Java, accessor methods in Ruby are created with a single line of code via metaprogramming. As invocation of these methods does not require the use of parentheses, it is trivial to change an instance variable into a full function, without modifying a single line of code or having to do any refactoring achieving similar functionality to C# and VB.NET property members.
Python's property descriptors are similar, but come with a tradeoff in the development process. If one begins in Python by using a publicly exposed instance variable, and later changes the implementation to use a private instance variable exposed through a property descriptor, code internal to the class may need to be adjusted to use the private variable rather than the public property. Ruby’s design forces all instance variables to be private, but also provides a simple way to declare set and get methods. This is in keeping with the idea that in Ruby, one never directly accesses the internal members of a class from outside of it; rather, one passes a message to the class and receives a response.
See the examples section for samples of code demonstrating Ruby syntax.
[edit]Deviations from behavior elsewhere
Some features which differ notably from languages such as C or Perl:
The language syntax is sensitive to the capitalization of identifiers, in most cases treating capitalized variables as constants.
The sigils $ and @ do not indicate variable data type as in Perl, but rather function as scope resolution operators.
To denote a floating point without a decimal component, one must follow with a zero digit (99.0) or an explicit conversion (99.to_f). It is insufficient to append a dot (99.) since numbers are susceptible to method syntax.
Boolean evaluation of non-boolean data is strict: 0, "" and [] are all evaluated to true. In C, the expression 0 ? 1 : 0 evaluates to 0 (i.e. false). In Ruby, however, it yields 1, as all numbers evaluate to true; only nil and false evaluate to false. A corollary to this rule is that Ruby methods by convention — for example, regular-expression searches — return numbers, strings, lists, or other non-false values on success, but nil on failure. This convention is also used in Smalltalk, where only the special objects true and false can be used in a boolean expression.
Versions prior to 1.9 use plain integers to represent single characters, much like C. This may cause surprises when slicing strings: "abc"[0] yields 97 (the ASCII code of the first character in the string); to obtain "a" use "abc"[0,1] (a substring of length 1) or "abc"[0].chr.
The notation statement until expression, like Perl but unlike other languages' equivalent statements (e.g. do { statement } while (!(expression)); in C/C++/...), actually never runs the statement if the expression is already true. This is because statement until expression is actually syntactic sugar over until expression; statement; end, the equivalent of which in C/C++ is while (!(expression)) { statement; }, just as statement if expression is equivalent to if (expression) { statement; }. However, the notation begin statement end until expression in Ruby will in fact run the statement once even if the expression is already true, acting similar to the "do-while" of other languages. (Matz has expressed a desire to remove the special behavior of begin statement end until expression,[39] but it still exists as of Ruby 1.9.)
Because constants are references to objects, changing what a constant refers to generates a warning, but modifying the object itself does not. For example, Greeting << " world!" if Greeting == "Hello" does not generate an error or warning. This is similar to final variables in Java or a const pointer to a non-const object in C++, but Ruby provides the functionality to "freeze" an object, unlike Java.
Some features which differ notably from other languages:
The usual operators for conditional expressions, and and or, do not follow the normal rules of precedence: and does not bind tighter than or. Ruby also has expression operators || and && which work as expected.
A list of so-called gotchas may be found in Hal Fulton's book The Ruby Way, 2nd ed (ISBN 0-672-32884-4), Section 1.5. A similar list in the 1st edition pertained to an older version of Ruby (version 1.6), some problems of which have been fixed in the meantime. retry, for example, now works with while, until, and for, as well as iterators.
[edit]Interaction
See also: Interactive Ruby Shell
The Ruby official distribution also includes "irb", an interactive command-line interpreter which can be used to test code quickly. The following code fragment represents a sample session using irb:
$ irb
irb(main):001:0> puts "Hello, World"
Hello, World
=> nil
irb(main):002:0> 1+2
=> 3
[edit]Examples
The following examples can be run in a Ruby shell such as Interactive Ruby Shell or saved in a file and run from the command line by typing ruby <filename>.
Classic Hello world example:
puts "Hello World!"
Some basic Ruby code:
# Everything, including a literal, is an object, so this works:
-199.abs # 199
"ice is nice".length # 11
"ruby is cool.".index("u") # 1
"Nice Day Isn't It?".downcase.split("").uniq.sort.join # " '?acdeinsty"
Conversions:
puts "What's your lucky number?"
number = gets.chomp
puts number.to_i
output_number = number.to_i + 1
puts output_number.to_s + ' is a bigger and better favorite number.'
[edit]Strings
There are a variety of ways to define strings in Ruby.
The following assignments are equivalent and support Variable interpolation:
a = "\nThis is a double-quoted string\n"
a = %Q{\nThis is a double-quoted string\n}
a = %{\nThis is a double-quoted string\n}
a = %/\nThis is a double-quoted string\n/
a = <<-BLOCK
This is a double-quoted string
BLOCK
The following assignments are equivalent and produce raw strings:
a = 'This is a single-quoted string'
a = %q{This is a single-quoted string}
[edit]Collections
Constructing and using an array:
a = [1, 'hi', 3.14, 1, 2, [4, 5]]
puts a[2] # 3.14
puts a.[](2) # 3.14
puts a.reverse # [[4, 5], 2, 1, 3.14, 'hi', 1]
puts a.flatten.uniq # [1, 'hi', 3.14, 2, 4, 5]
Constructing and using an associative array (called hashes in Ruby):
hash = Hash.new
hash = { :water => 'wet', :fire => 'hot' }
puts hash[:fire] # Prints: hot
hash.each_pair do |key, value| # Or: hash.each do |key, value|
puts "#{key} is #{value}"
end
# Prints: water is wet
# fire is hot
hash.delete :water # Deletes water: 'wet'
hash.delete_if {|key,value| value=='hot'} # Deletes :fire => 'hot'
[edit]Blocks and iterators
The two syntaxes for creating a code block:
{ puts "Hello, World!" } # Note the { braces }
#or
do
puts "Hello, World!"
end
When a code block is created it is always attached to a method as an optional block argument.
Parameter-passing a block to be a closure:
# In an object instance variable (denoted with '@'), remember a block.
def remember(&a_block)
@block = a_block
end
# Invoke the above method, giving it a block which takes a name.
remember {|name| puts "Hello, #{name}!"}
# When the time is right (for the object) -- call the closure!
@block.call("Jon")
# => "Hello, Jon!"
Creating an anonymous function:
proc {|arg| print arg}
Proc.new {|arg| print arg}
lambda {|arg| print arg}
# introduced in Ruby 1.9
->(arg) {print arg}
Returning closures from a method:
def create_set_and_get(initial_value=0) # Note the default value of 0
closure_value = initial_value
return Proc.new {|x| closure_value = x}, Proc.new { closure_value }
end
setter, getter = create_set_and_get # ie. returns two values
setter.call(21)
getter.call # => 21
#You can also use a parameter variable as a binding for the closure.
#So the above can be rewritten as...
def create_set_and_get(closure_value=0)
return proc {|x| closure_value = x } , proc { closure_value }
end
Yielding the flow of program control to a block which was provided at calling time:
def use_hello
yield "hello"
end
# Invoke the above method, passing it a block.
use_hello {|string| puts string} # => 'hello'
Iterating over enumerations and arrays using blocks:
array = [1, 'hi', 3.14]
array.each {|item| puts item }
# => 1
# => 'hi'
# => 3.14
array.each_index {|index| puts "#{index}: #{array[index]}" }
# => 0: 1
# => 1: 'hi'
# => 2: 3.14
# The following uses a Range
(3..6).each {|num| puts num }
# => 3
# => 4
# => 5
# => 6
A method such as inject() can accept both a parameter and a block. Inject iterates over each member of a list, performing some function on it while retaining an aggregate. This is analogous to the foldl function in functional programming languages. For example:
[1,3,5].inject(10) {|sum, element| sum + element} # => 19
On the first pass, the block receives 10 (the argument to inject) as sum, and 1 (the first element of the array) as element; this returns 11. 11 then becomes sum on the next pass, which is added to 3 to get 14. 14 is then added to 5, to finally return 19.
Blocks work with many built-in methods:
File.open('file.txt', 'w') do |file| # 'w' denotes "write mode".
file.puts 'Wrote some text.'
end # File is automatically closed here
File.readlines('file.txt').each do |line|
puts line
end
# => Wrote some text.
Using an enumeration and a block to square the numbers 1 to 10 (using a range):
(1..10).collect {|x| x*x} # => [1, 4, 9, 16, 25, 36, 49, 64, 81, 100]
Or invoke a method on each item
(1..5).collect(&:to_f) # => [1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0]
[edit]Classes
The following code defines a class named Person. In addition to 'initialize', the usual constructor to create new objects, it has two methods: one to override the <=> comparison operator (so Array#sort can sort by age) and the other to override the to_s method (so Kernel#puts can format its output). Here, "attr_reader" is an example of metaprogramming in Ruby: "attr_accessor" defines getter and setter methods of instance variables, "attr_reader" only getter methods. Also, the last evaluated statement in a method is its return value, allowing the omission of an explicit 'return'.
class Person
attr_reader :name, :age
def initialize(name, age)
@name, @age = name, age
end
def <=>(person) # Comparison operator for sorting
age <=> person.age
end
def to_s
"#{name} (#{age})"
end
end
group = [
Person.new("Bob", 33),
Person.new("Chris", 16),
Person.new("Ash", 23)
]
puts group.sort.reverse
The above prints three names in reverse age order:
Bob (33)
Ash (23)
Chris (16)
[edit]Open classes
In Ruby, classes are never closed: you can always add methods to an existing class. This applies to the classes you write as well as the standard, built-in classes. All you have to do is open up a class definition for an existing class, and the new contents you specify will be added to whatever's there. A simple example of adding a new method to the standard library's Time class:
# re-open Ruby's Time class
class Time
def yesterday
self - 86400
end
end
today = Time.now # => Thu Aug 14 16:51:50 +1200 2008
yesterday = today.yesterday # => Wed Aug 13 16:51:50 +1200 2008
Adding methods to previously defined classes is often called monkey-patching. This practice, however, can lead to possible collisions of behavior and subsequent unexpected results, and is a concern for code scalability if performed recklessly.
[edit]Exceptions
An exception is raised with a raise call:
raise
An optional message can be added to the exception:
raise "This is a message"
You can also specify which type of exception you want to raise:
raise ArgumentError, "Illegal arguments!"
Alternatively, you can pass an exception instance to the raise method:
raise ArgumentError.new("Illegal arguments!")
This last construct is useful when you need to raise a custom exception class featuring a constructor which takes more than one argument:
class ParseError < Exception
def initialize input, line, pos
super "Could not parse '#{input}' at line #{line}, position #{pos}"
end
end
raise ParseError.new("Foo", 3, 9)
Exceptions are handled by the rescue clause. Such a clause can catch exceptions which inherit from StandardError. Also supported for use with exceptions are else and ensure
begin
# Do something
rescue
# Handle exception
else
# Do this if no exception was raised
ensure
# Do this whether or not an exception was raised
end
It is a common mistake to attempt to catch all exceptions with a simple rescue clause. To catch all exceptions one must write:
begin
# Do something
rescue Exception
# don't write just rescue -- that only catches StandardError, a subclass of Exception
# Handle exception
end
Or catch particular exceptions:
begin
# ...
rescue RuntimeError
# handling
end
It is also possible to specify that the exception object be made available to the handler clause:
begin
# ...
rescue RuntimeError => e
# handling, possibly involving e, such as "print e.to_s"
end
Alternatively, the most recent exception is stored in the magic global $!.
You can also catch several exceptions:
begin
# ...
rescue RuntimeError, Timeout::Error => e
# handling, possibly involving e
end
[edit]Metaprogramming
Ruby code can programmatically modify, at runtime, aspects of its own structure that would be fixed in more rigid languages, such as class and method definitions. This sort of metaprogramming can be used to write more concise code and effectively extend the language.
For example, the following Ruby code generates new methods for the built-in String class, based on a list of colors. The methods wrap the contents of the string with an HTML tag styled with the respective color.
COLORS = { black: "000",
red: "f00",
green: "0f0",
yellow: "ff0",
blue: "00f",
magenta: "f0f",
cyan: "0ff",
white: "fff" }
class String
COLORS.each do |color,code|
define_method "in_#{color}" do
"<span style=\"color: ##{code}\">#{self}</span>"
end
end
end
The generated methods could then be used like so:
"Hello, World!".in_blue
==> "<span style==\"color: #00f\">Hello, World!</span>"
To implement the equivalent in many other languages, the programmer would have to write each method (in_black, in_red, in_green, etc.) by hand.
Some other possible uses for Ruby metaprogramming include:
intercepting and modifying method calls
implementing new inheritance models
dynamically generating classes from parameters
automatic object serialization
interactive help and debugging
[edit]More examples
More sample Ruby code is available as algorithms in the following articles:
Exponentiating by squaring
Trabb Pardo-Knuth algorithm
[edit]Implementations
See also: Ruby MRI#Operating systems
Ruby 1.9 has multiple implementations:
The official Ruby interpreter often referred to as the Matz's Ruby Interpreter or MRI. This implementation is written in C and uses its own Ruby-specific virtual machine,
JRuby, a Java implementation that runs on the Java virtual machine,
Rubinius, C++ bytecode VM that uses LLVM to compile to machine code at runtime. The bytecode compiler and most core classes are written in pure Ruby.
Other Ruby implementations:
MagLev (software), a Smalltalk implementation on VMware’s GemStone VM.
MacRuby, an OS X implementation on the Objective-C runtime,
Cardinal, an implementation for the Parrot virtual machine,
IronRuby, an implementation on the .NET Framework.
The maturity of Ruby implementations tends to be measured by their ability to run the Ruby on Rails (Rails) framework, because it is a complex framework to implement, and it uses many Ruby-specific features. The point when a particular implementation achieves this goal is called The Rails singularity. The reference implementation (MRI), JRuby, and Rubinius[40] are all able to run Rails unmodified in a production environment. IronRuby[41][42] is starting to be able to run Rails test cases, but is still far from being production-ready.
Ruby is available on many operating systems, such as Linux, Mac OS X, Microsoft Windows, Windows Phone,[43] Windows CE and most flavors of Unix.
Ruby 1.9 has recently been ported onto Symbian OS 9.x.[44]
[edit]Repositories and libraries
RubyGems is Ruby's package manager. A Ruby package is called a 'gem' and can easily be installed via the command line. There are over 50,000 Ruby gems hosted on RubyGems.org.
Many new and existing Ruby libraries are hosted on GitHub, a service that offers version control repository hosting for Git.
[edit]See also
Free software portal
Computer programming portal
Comparison of programming languages
Ruby MRI, the reference C implementation
JRuby
MacRuby
IronRuby
Rubinius
MagLev
XRuby
Ruby on Rails
Why's (poignant) Guide to Ruby - an online ruby textbook in graphic novel format
Metasploit Project - the world's largest Ruby project with over 700,000 lines of code
[edit]References
^ a b c Cooper, Peter (2009). Beginning Ruby: From Novice to Professional. Beginning from Novice to Professional (2nd ed.). Berkeley: APress. p. 101. ISBN 1-4302-2363-4. "To a lesser extent, Python, LISP, Eiffel, Ada, and C++ have also influenced Ruby."
^ a b c d e f Bini, Ola (2007). Practical JRuby on Rails Web 2.0 Projects: Bringing Ruby on Rails to Java. Berkeley: APress. p. 3. ISBN 1-59059-881-4. "It draws primarily on features from Perl, Smalltalk, Python, Lisp, Dylan, and CLU."
^ Bertels, Christopher (23 February 2011). "Introduction to Fancy". Rubinius blog. Engine Yard. Retrieved 2011-07-21.
^ Bini, Ola. "Ioke". Ioke.org. Retrieved 2011-07-21. "inspired by Io, Smalltalk, Lisp and Ruby"
^ Burks, Tim. "About Nu™". Programming Nu™. Neon Design Technology, Inc. Retrieved 2011-07-21.
^ COPYING in Ruby official source repository
^ BSDL in Ruby official source repository
^ http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/about/
^ プログラム言語RubyのJIS規格（JIS X 3017）制定について
^ プログラム言語Ruby、国際規格として承認
^ Ruby-Lang About Ruby
^ a b http://www.linuxdevcenter.com/pub/a/linux/2001/11/29/ruby.html An Interview with the Creator of Ruby
^ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEkJvvGEtB4 Google Tech Talks - Ruby 1.9
^ a b c http://blog.nicksieger.com/articles/2006/10/20/rubyconf-history-of-ruby History of Ruby
^ http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/88819 "[FYI: historic] The decisive moment of the language name Ruby. (Re: [ANN] ruby 1.8.1)" - Email from Hiroshi Sugihara to ruby-talk
^ "The Ruby Language FAQ - 1.3 Why the name 'Ruby'?". Ruby-Doc.org. Retrieved April 10, 2012.
^ Yukihiro Matsumoto (June 11, 1999). "Re: the name of Ruby?". Ruby-Talk mailing list. Retrieved April 10, 2012.
^ More archeolinguistics: unearthing proto-Ruby
^ "Re: history of ruby" - Email from Yukihiro Matsumoto to ruby-talk
^ "TUTORIAL - ruby's features" - Email From Yukihiro Matsumoto to ruby-list
^ [1]
^ "Ruby 1.9.3 p0 is released". ruby-lang.org. October 31, 2011. Retrieved February 20, 2013.
^ "v1_9_3_0/NEWS". Ruby Subversion source repository. ruby-lang.org. September 17, 2011. Retrieved February 20, 2013.
^ http://slideshow.rubyforge.org/ruby19.html
^ http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2013/02/24/ruby-2-0-0-p0-is-released/
^ http://www.ruby-lang.org/en/news/2013/02/24/ruby-2-0-0-p0-is-released/#label-8
^ The Ruby Programming Language by Yukihiro Matsumoto on 2000-06-12 (informit.com)
^ a b c The Philosophy of Ruby, A Conversation with Yukihiro Matsumoto, Part I by Bill Venners on 2003-09-29 (Artima Developer)
^ Ruby Weekly News 23rd - 29th May 2005
^ An Interview with the Creator of Ruby
^ Dynamic Productivity with Ruby
^ martinfowler.com
^ Ruby - Add class methods at runtime
^ Blocks and Closures in Ruby
^ Unicode support in Ruby is too buggy compared to similar programming languages
^ Green threads
^ Ruby FAQ
^ In Ruby's syntax, statement is just a special case of an expression which cannot appear as an argument (e.g. multiple assignment). http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/1120
statement [...] can not be part of expression unless grouped within parentheses. http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/2460
^ http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-core/6745
^ Peter Cooper (2010-05-18). "The Why, What, and How of Rubinius 1.0's Release".
^ John Lam (2008-05-25). "IronRuby / Rails Question". Retrieved 2008-05-25.
^ John Lam (2008-05-30). "IronRuby and Rails". Retrieved 2008-06-01.
^ "Iron Ruby on Windows Phone 7".
^ "Ruby 1.9 for Symbian OS". Retrieved 2010-07-28.
[edit]Further reading
McAnally, Jeremy; Arkin, Assaf (March 28, 2009), Ruby in Practice (First ed.), Manning Publications, p. 360, ISBN 1-933988-47-9
Thomas, Dave; Fowler, Chad; Hunt, Andy (April 28, 2009), Programming Ruby 1.9: The Pragmatic Programmers' Guide (Third ed.), Pragmatic Bookshelf, p. 1000, ISBN 1-934356-08-5
Black, David (June 4, 2009), The Well-Grounded Rubyist (First ed.), Manning Publications, p. 520, ISBN 1-933988-65-7
Flanagan, David; Matsumoto, Yukihiro (January 25, 2008), The Ruby Programming Language (First ed.), O'Reilly Media, p. 446, ISBN 0-596-51617-7
Baird, Kevin (June 8, 2007), Ruby by Example: Concepts and Code (First ed.), No Starch Press, p. 326, ISBN 1-59327-148-4
Fitzgerald, Michael (May 14, 2007), Learning Ruby (First ed.), O'Reilly Media, p. 255, ISBN 0-596-52986-4
Cooper, Peter (March 26, 2007), Beginning Ruby: From Novice to Professional (First ed.), Apress, p. 664, ISBN 1-59059-766-4
Fulton, Hal (November 4, 2006), The Ruby Way (Second ed.), Addison-Wesley Professional, p. 888, ISBN 0-596-52369-6
Carlson, Lucas; Richardson, Leonard (July 19, 2006), Ruby Cookbook (First ed.), O'Reilly Media, p. 906, ISBN 0-596-52369-6
[edit]External links
Wikimedia Commons has media related to: Ruby programming language
Wikibooks has a book on the topic of: Ruby Programming
Wikiversity has learning materials about Topic:Ruby
Official website
Ruby documentation site
Ruby Draft Specification- Sep 2010
Wiki: Ruby language and implementation specification
Ruby at the Open Directory Project
Try Ruby! - web-based Ruby REPL
The Great Ruby Shootout (December 2008): Ruby implementations comparison.
Collingbourne, Huw (June 17 2006), The Little Book Of Ruby, free PDF eBook 1.1MB, pp. 87
Collingbourne, Huw (April 18 2009), The Book Of Ruby, free PDF eBook 2.9MB, pp. 425
Ruby.on-page.net — simple Ruby manual with many samples
Ruby User Guide By Matz, the creator of Ruby. Translated into English.
Ruby From Other Languages
Writing C Extensions to Ruby (MRI 1.8)
RubyFlow: Community Filtered Ruby News
The Ruby Reflector Automated Ruby News
Ruby Forum - Gateway to the ruby-talk mailing list
The Ruby in Stone Ruby IDE inside FlowStone Programming Language
[hide] v t e
Ruby programming language
IDE
NetBeans RubyForge RadRails RubyMine ActiveState Komodo
Implementations
Ruby MRI YARV JRuby IronRuby Rubinius XRuby MacRuby RubyJS HotRuby RubyMotion
Applications
Capistrano Chef Hackety Hack Interactive Ruby Shell Pry Puppet Rake RSpec RubyGems
Libraries and frameworks
Adhearsion Camping eRuby (RHTML) Hobo Merb Nitro RubyCocoa Ruby on Rails Ramaze Sinatra QtRuby
Server software
Mongrel Phusion Passenger (mod_rails/mod_rack) WEBrick mod_ruby Unicorn Thin
Other
Application Archives Document format Book Guides Ruby Central RubyKaigi
Category
Categories: Class-based programming languagesDynamically typed programming languagesScripting languagesObject-oriented programming languagesArticles with example Ruby codeRuby programming languageProgramming languages created in 1995Text-oriented programming languages