daemon/daemon_windows.go
Method Daemon.initNetworkController
has a Cognitive Complexity of 75 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func (daemon *Daemon) initNetworkController(daemonCfg *config.Config, activeSandboxes map[string]interface{}) error {
netOptions, err := daemon.networkOptions(daemonCfg, nil, daemon.id, nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method Daemon.initNetworkController
has 134 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func (daemon *Daemon) initNetworkController(daemonCfg *config.Config, activeSandboxes map[string]interface{}) error {
netOptions, err := daemon.networkOptions(daemonCfg, nil, daemon.id, nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}
Function verifyPlatformContainerResources
has a Cognitive Complexity of 43 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func verifyPlatformContainerResources(resources *containertypes.Resources, isHyperv bool) (warnings []string, err error) {
fixMemorySwappiness(resources)
if !isHyperv {
// The processor resource controls are mutually exclusive on
// Windows Server Containers, the order of precedence is
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function verifyPlatformContainerResources
has 88 lines of code (exceeds 50 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
Open
func verifyPlatformContainerResources(resources *containertypes.Resources, isHyperv bool) (warnings []string, err error) {
fixMemorySwappiness(resources)
if !isHyperv {
// The processor resource controls are mutually exclusive on
// Windows Server Containers, the order of precedence is
Function verifyPlatformContainerResources
has 24 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func verifyPlatformContainerResources(resources *containertypes.Resources, isHyperv bool) (warnings []string, err error) {
fixMemorySwappiness(resources)
if !isHyperv {
// The processor resource controls are mutually exclusive on
// Windows Server Containers, the order of precedence is
Method Daemon.initNetworkController
has 8 return statements (exceeds 4 allowed). Open
Open
func (daemon *Daemon) initNetworkController(daemonCfg *config.Config, activeSandboxes map[string]interface{}) error {
netOptions, err := daemon.networkOptions(daemonCfg, nil, daemon.id, nil)
if err != nil {
return err
}