dotcloud/docker

View on GitHub
libnetwork/cmd/ssd/ssd.py

Summary

Maintainability
C
1 day
Test Coverage

Function check_network has a Cognitive Complexity of 56 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def check_network(nw_name, ingress=False):

    print "Verifying LB programming for containers on network %s" % nw_name

    data = cli.inspect_network(nw_name, verbose=True)
Severity: Minor
Found in libnetwork/cmd/ssd/ssd.py - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                for key, val in task.items():
                    if isinstance(val, dict):
                        for k, v in val.items():
                            entries.append(v)
                    else:
Severity: Major
Found in libnetwork/cmd/ssd/ssd.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Function get_namespaces has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def get_namespaces(data, ingress=False):
        if ingress is True:
            return {"Ingress":"/var/run/docker/netns/ingress_sbox"}
        else:
            spaces =[]
    Severity: Minor
    Found in libnetwork/cmd/ssd/ssd.py - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function check_iptables has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def check_iptables(name, plist):
        replace = (':', ',')
        ports = []
        for port in plist:
            for r in replace:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in libnetwork/cmd/ssd/ssd.py - About 25 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            for key in stasks.keys():
                if key not in realmark:
                    print "LB Index %s" % key, "present in docker daemon but missing in IPVS"
                    del stasks[key]
    Severity: Major
    Found in libnetwork/cmd/ssd/ssd.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    libnetwork/cmd/ssd/ssd.py on lines 110..113

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 39.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

            for key in realmark.keys():
                if key not in stasks:
                    print "LB Index %s" % key, "present in IPVS but missing in docker daemon"
                    del realmark[key]
    Severity: Major
    Found in libnetwork/cmd/ssd/ssd.py and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    libnetwork/cmd/ssd/ssd.py on lines 115..118

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 39.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status