Method get_field_names
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_field_names(mapped_headers, header_prefix = nil, mapped = true)
fields = []
schema.each do |field_name, field_options|
next if field_options[:alias_of]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method map_headers_to_has_many_associations
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def map_headers_to_has_many_associations(headers, mapped_headers)
schema.each do |field_name, field_options|
next unless field_options[:type] == :has_many
get_header_prefixes(field_name, field_options).each do |header_prefix|
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method map_headers_to_fields
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def map_headers_to_fields(headers, mapped_headers, header_prefix)
schema.each do |field_name, field_options|
if header_prefix
unless (indexes = find_indexes_for_field(headers, field_options, header_prefix)).empty?
mapped_headers[field_options[:alias_of] || field_name] = { indexes: indexes }
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method get_model_field_names
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_model_field_names(field_name, field_options, mapped_headers, header_prefix, mapped)
Method map_headers_to_has_one_associations
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def map_headers_to_has_one_associations(headers, mapped_headers, header_prefix)
schema.each do |field_name, field_options|
next unless field_options[:type] == :has_one
mapped_model = get_mapped_model(field_options, headers, header_prefix)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"