Showing 869 of 869 total issues
Method getConverter
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
@Nullable
public <T> ParamConverter<T> getConverter(final Class<T> rawType, final Type genericType, final Annotation[] annotations) {
if (Optional.class.equals(rawType)) {
final List<ClassTypePair> ctps = ReflectionHelper.getTypeArgumentAndClass(genericType);
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method createClient
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
protected ConfiguredCloseableHttpClient createClient(
final org.apache.http.impl.client.HttpClientBuilder builder,
final InstrumentedHttpClientConnectionManager manager,
final String name) {
final String cookiePolicy = configuration.isCookiesEnabled() ? CookieSpecs.DEFAULT : CookieSpecs.IGNORE_COOKIES;
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
FileAppenderFactoryTest
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class FileAppenderFactoryTest {
static {
BootstrapLogging.bootstrap();
}
AuthBaseTest
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public abstract class AuthBaseTest<T extends DropwizardResourceConfig> extends JerseyTest {
protected static final String ADMIN_ROLE = "ADMIN";
protected static final String ADMIN_USER = "good-guy";
protected static final String ORDINARY_USER = "ordinary-guy";
protected static final String BADGUY_USER = "bad-guy";
Builder
has 24 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
static class Builder {
private static final int MAX_SUGGESTIONS = 5;
private String summary;
private String detail = "";
Method testHelpPage
has 65 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Test
void testHelpPage() throws Exception {
MigrationTestSupport.createSubparser(dumpCommand).printHelp(new PrintWriter(new OutputStreamWriter(baos, UTF_8), true));
assertThat(baos.toString(UTF_8.name())).isEqualTo(String.format(
"usage: db dump [-h] [--migrations MIGRATIONS-FILE] [--catalog CATALOG]%n" +
File DropwizardTestSupport.java
has 275 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package io.dropwizard.testing;
import com.fasterxml.jackson.databind.ObjectMapper;
import io.dropwizard.Application;
import io.dropwizard.Configuration;
Method doGet
has 63 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Override
protected void doGet(HttpServletRequest req,
HttpServletResponse resp) throws ServletException, IOException {
try {
final StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder(req.getServletPath());
AbstractAppenderFactory
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public abstract class AbstractAppenderFactory<E extends DeferredProcessingAware> implements AppenderFactory<E> {
private static final Logger LOGGER = LoggerFactory.getLogger(AbstractAppenderFactory.class);
@NotNull
protected Level threshold = Level.ALL;
FileAppenderFactory
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@JsonTypeName("file")
public class FileAppenderFactory<E extends DeferredProcessingAware> extends AbstractOutputStreamAppenderFactory<E> {
@Nullable
private String currentLogFilename;
Bootstrap
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
public class Bootstrap<T extends Configuration> {
private final Application<T> application;
private final List<ConfiguredBundle<? super T>> configuredBundles;
private final List<Command> commands;
TaskServletTest
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class TaskServletTest {
private final Task gc = mock(Task.class);
private final PostBodyTask printJSON = mock(PostBodyTask.class);
private final MetricRegistry metricRegistry = new MetricRegistry();
UnitOfWorkApplicationListenerTest
has 22 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@SuppressWarnings("HibernateResourceOpenedButNotSafelyClosed")
class UnitOfWorkApplicationListenerTest {
private final SessionFactory sessionFactory = mock(SessionFactory.class);
private final SessionFactory analyticsSessionFactory = mock(SessionFactory.class);
private final UnitOfWorkApplicationListener listener = new UnitOfWorkApplicationListener();
File DropwizardSSLConnectionSocketFactoryTest.java
has 263 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package io.dropwizard.client;
import io.dropwizard.Application;
import io.dropwizard.Configuration;
import io.dropwizard.client.ssl.TlsConfiguration;
Method testBuildConnector
has 57 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
@Test
void testBuildConnector() throws Exception {
HttpConnectorFactory http = spy(new HttpConnectorFactory());
http.setBindHost("127.0.0.1");
http.setAcceptorThreads(Optional.of(1));
File UnitOfWorkApplicationListenerTest.java
has 261 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
package io.dropwizard.hibernate;
import org.glassfish.jersey.server.ExtendedUriInfo;
import org.glassfish.jersey.server.model.Resource;
import org.glassfish.jersey.server.monitoring.RequestEvent;
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Test
void testRemoveOnCancelTrue() {
final String poolName = this.getClass().getSimpleName();
final ScheduledExecutorServiceBuilder test = new ScheduledExecutorServiceBuilder(this.le,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 145.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Test
void testRemoveOnCancelFalse() {
final String poolName = this.getClass().getSimpleName();
final ScheduledExecutorServiceBuilder test = new ScheduledExecutorServiceBuilder(this.le,
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 145.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Test
void isUnhealthyIfIsNotValid() {
final Session session = mock(Session.class);
when(factory.openSession()).thenReturn(session);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 143.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
@Test
void isHealthyIfIsValid() {
final Session session = mock(Session.class);
when(factory.openSession()).thenReturn(session);
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 143.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76