Showing 20 of 23 total issues
File module.py
has 550 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
r"""Contain functionalities to analyze a ``torch.nn.Module``."""
from __future__ import annotations
__all__ = [
File cos_sin.py
has 364 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
r"""Contain modules to encode scalar values with cosine and sine
representations."""
from __future__ import annotations
Function find_module_state_dict
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_module_state_dict(state_dict: dict | list | tuple | set, module_keys: set) -> dict:
r"""Try to find automatically the part of the state dict related to a
module.
The user should specify the set of module's keys:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
__all__ = [
"Asinh",
"AsinhCosSinScalarEncoder",
"AsinhMSELoss",
"AsinhScalarEncoder",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
__all__ = [
"Asinh",
"AsinhCosSinScalarEncoder",
"AsinhMSELoss",
"AsinhScalarEncoder",
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 46.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Function general_robust_regression_loss
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def general_robust_regression_loss(
Function create_rand_frequency
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_rand_frequency(
Function __init__
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(
Function create_logspace_frequency
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_logspace_frequency(
Function create_logspace_value_range
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_logspace_value_range(
Function create_rand_value_range
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_rand_value_range(
Function create_linspace_value_range
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_linspace_value_range(
Function create_linspace_frequency
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_linspace_frequency(
Function __init__
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def __init__(
Function create_linspace_scale
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_linspace_scale(
Function create_logspace_scale
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def create_logspace_scale(
Function get_named_modules
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def get_named_modules(
module: nn.Module, depth: int = 0
) -> Generator[tuple[str, nn.Module], None, None]:
r"""Return an iterator over the modules, yielding both the name of
the module as well as the module itself.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function find_in_features
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_in_features(self, module: nn.ModuleList) -> list[int]:
sizes = set()
for child in module:
with contextlib.suppress(SizeNotFoundError):
sizes.add(tuple(find_in_features(child)))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function find_out_features
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def find_out_features(self, module: nn.ModuleList) -> list[int]:
sizes = set()
for child in module:
with contextlib.suppress(SizeNotFoundError):
sizes.add(tuple(find_out_features(child)))
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function merge_size_dtype
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def merge_size_dtype(
sizes: list[torch.Size | Sequence[torch.Size] | Mapping[str, torch.Size]],
dtypes: list[torch.dtype | Sequence[torch.dtype] | Mapping[str, torch.dtype]],
) -> list[str]:
r"""Return joined string representations of the sizes and data types.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"