Sign upLogin

eager-dev/eagerx

View on GitHub
Star
eagerx/core/rx_operators.py

Summary

Maintainability
F
4 days
Test Coverage
A
93%

Function generate_msgs has a Cognitive Complexity of 56 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def generate_msgs(
    source_Nc: Observable,
    rate_node: float,
    name: str,
    rate_in: float,
Severity: Minor
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 1 day to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function convert has a Cognitive Complexity of 39 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def convert(space: eagerx.Space, processor, name, component, node, direction="out"):
    OUTPUT = True if direction == "out" else False
    INPUT = True if direction == "in" else False
    space_checked = [False]
    p_msg = f" (after processing with `{processor.__class__.__qualname__}`)" if processor else ""
Severity: Minor
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 5 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function remap_cb_input has a Cognitive Complexity of 37 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def remap_cb_input(mode=0):
    def _remap_cb_input(value):
        # mode=0 (info only), mode=1 (msgs only), mode=2 (all)
        if mode == 2:
            return value
Severity: Minor
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 5 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function regroup_inputs has a Cognitive Complexity of 30 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def regroup_inputs(node, rate_node=1, is_input=True, perform_checks=True):
    node_name = node.ns_name
    color = node.color

    def _regroup_inputs(source):
Severity: Minor
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 4 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function throttle_with_time has a Cognitive Complexity of 25 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def throttle_with_time(dt, node, rate_tol: float = 0.95, log_level: int = DEBUG):
    time_fn = lambda: time.monotonic_ns() / 1e9  # noqa: E731
    node_name = node.ns_name
    color = node.color
    effective_log_level = node.backend.log_level
Severity: Minor
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function trace_observable has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def trace_observable(
    id: str,
    node,
    trace_next=False,
    trace_next_payload=False,
Severity: Minor
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 3 hrs to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function with_latest_from has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def with_latest_from(*sources: Observable):
    def _with_latest_from(parent: Observable) -> Observable:
        NO_VALUE = NotSet()

        def subscribe(observer, scheduler=None):
Severity: Minor
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function switch_to_reset has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def switch_to_reset():
    def _switch_to_reset(source):
        def subscribe(observer, scheduler=None):
            reset_mode = [False]
Severity: Minor
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 1 hr to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function filter_dict has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def filter_dict():
    def _filter_dict(source):
        def subscribe(observer, scheduler=None):
            def on_next(value):
                d = dict()
Severity: Minor
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 55 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function init_state_inputs_channel has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

def init_state_inputs_channel(ns, state_inputs, scheduler, node):
    if len(state_inputs) > 0:
        channels = []
        for s in state_inputs:
            d = s["done"].pipe(
Severity: Minor
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Avoid deeply nested control flow statements.
Open

                        if mode == 0:
                            i[key] = filter_info_for_printing(msg.info)
                        else:
                            i[key] = msg.msgs
        else:
Severity: Major
Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Function init_state_resets has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def init_state_resets(ns, state_inputs, trigger, scheduler, tp_scheduler, node):
    if len(state_inputs) > 0:
        channels = []

        for s in state_inputs:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 45 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function init_real_reset has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def init_real_reset(
    ns,
    Nc,
    rate_node,
    RR,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Function cb_ft has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

    def cb_ft(cb_input, sync):
    # Fill output msg with number of node ticks
    output_msgs = dict()
    for key, msg in cb_input.items():
        if key not in ["node_tick", "t_n"]:
    Severity: Minor
    Found in eagerx/core/rx_operators.py - About 35 mins to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status