Mass assignment is not restricted using attr_accessible Open
class DueDate < ActiveRecord::Base
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This warning comes up if a model does not limit what attributes can be set through mass assignment.
In particular, this check looks for attr_accessible
inside model definitions. If it is not found, this warning will be issued.
Brakeman also warns on use of attr_protected
- especially since it was found to be vulnerable to bypass. Warnings for mass assignment on models using attr_protected
will be reported, but at a lower confidence level.
Note that disabling mass assignment globally will suppress these warnings.
Unprotected mass assignment Open
submit_duedate = DueDate.new(duedate)
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Mass assignment is a feature of Rails which allows an application to create a record from the values of a hash.
Example:
User.new(params[:user])
Unfortunately, if there is a user field called admin
which controls administrator access, now any user can make themselves an administrator.
attr_accessible
and attr_protected
can be used to limit mass assignment. However, Brakeman will warn unless attr_accessible
is used, or mass assignment is completely disabled.
There are two different mass assignment warnings which can arise. The first is when mass assignment actually occurs, such as the example above. This results in a warning like
Unprotected mass assignment near line 61: User.new(params[:user])
The other warning is raised whenever a model is found which does not use attr_accessible
. This produces generic warnings like
Mass assignment is not restricted using attr_accessible
with a list of affected models.
In Rails 3.1 and newer, mass assignment can easily be disabled:
config.active_record.whitelist_attributes = true
Unfortunately, it can also easily be bypassed:
User.new(params[:user], :without_protection => true)
Brakeman will warn on uses of without_protection
.
Assignment Branch Condition size for get_next_due_date is too high. [20.05/15] Open
def self.get_next_due_date(assignment_id, topic_id = nil)
if Assignment.find(assignment_id).staggered_deadline?
next_due_date = TopicDueDate.find_by(['parent_id = ? and due_at >= ?', topic_id, Time.zone.now])
# if certion TopicDueDate is not exist, we should query next corresponding AssignmentDueDate.
# eg. Time.now is 08/28/2016
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Assignment Branch Condition size for done_in_assignment_round is too high. [18.17/15] Open
def self.done_in_assignment_round(assignment_id, response)
# for author feedback, quiz, teammate review and metareview, Expertiza only support one round, so the round # should be 1
return 0 if ResponseMap.find(response.map_id).type != "ReviewResponseMap"
due_dates = DueDate.where(parent_id: assignment_id)
# sorted so that the earliest deadline is at the first
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric
Method get_next_due_date
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.get_next_due_date(assignment_id, topic_id = nil)
if Assignment.find(assignment_id).staggered_deadline?
next_due_date = TopicDueDate.find_by(['parent_id = ? and due_at >= ?', topic_id, Time.zone.now])
# if certion TopicDueDate is not exist, we should query next corresponding AssignmentDueDate.
# eg. Time.now is 08/28/2016
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method done_in_assignment_round
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self.done_in_assignment_round(assignment_id, response)
# for author feedback, quiz, teammate review and metareview, Expertiza only support one round, so the round # should be 1
return 0 if ResponseMap.find(response.map_id).type != "ReviewResponseMap"
due_dates = DueDate.where(parent_id: assignment_id)
# sorted so that the earliest deadline is at the first
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method due_at_is_valid_datetime
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def due_at_is_valid_datetime
if due_at.present?
errors.add(:due_at, 'must be a valid datetime') if (DateTime.strptime(due_at.to_s, '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S') rescue ArgumentError) == ArgumentError
end
end
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid more than 3 levels of block nesting. Open
if assignment_due_date.due_at >= Time.zone.now
next_due_date = assignment_due_date
break
end
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for excessive nesting of conditional and looping constructs.
You can configure if blocks are considered using the CountBlocks
option. When set to false
(the default) blocks are not counted
towards the nesting level. Set to true
to count blocks as well.
The maximum level of nesting allowed is configurable.
Prefer Date or Time over DateTime. Open
errors.add(:due_at, 'must be a valid datetime') if (DateTime.strptime(due_at.to_s, '%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S') rescue ArgumentError) == ArgumentError
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
This cop checks for uses of DateTime
that should be replaced by
Date
or Time
.
Example:
# bad - uses `DateTime` for current time
DateTime.now
# good - uses `Time` for current time
Time.now
# bad - uses `DateTime` for modern date
DateTime.iso8601('2016-06-29')
# good - uses `Date` for modern date
Date.iso8601('2016-06-29')
# good - uses `DateTime` with start argument for historical date
DateTime.iso8601('1751-04-23', Date::ENGLAND)
Use a guard clause instead of wrapping the code inside a conditional expression. Open
if due_at.present?
- Read upRead up
- Exclude checks
Use a guard clause instead of wrapping the code inside a conditional expression
Example:
# bad
def test
if something
work
end
end
# good
def test
return unless something
work
end
# also good
def test
work if something
end
# bad
if something
raise 'exception'
else
ok
end
# good
raise 'exception' if something
ok