Sign upLogin

ece517-p3/expertiza

View on GitHub
Star
app/models/vm_question_response.rb

Summary

Maintainability
B
5 hrs
Test Coverage

Assignment Branch Condition size for add_reviews is too high. [44.68/15]
Open

  def add_reviews(participant, team, vary)
    if @questionnaire_type == "ReviewQuestionnaire"
      reviews = if vary
                  ReviewResponseMap.get_responses_for_team_round(team, @round)
                else
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Assignment Branch Condition size for add_answer is too high. [37.22/15]
Open

  def add_answer(answer)
    # We want to add each response score from this review (answer) to its corresponding
    # question row.
    @list_of_rows.each do |row|
      next unless row.question_id == answer.question_id
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Assignment Branch Condition size for initialize is too high. [18.55/15]
Open

  def initialize(questionnaire, assignment = nil, round = nil)
    @assignment = assignment
    @questionnaire = questionnaire
    if questionnaire.type == "ReviewQuestionnaire"
      @round = round ? round : AssignmentQuestionnaire.find_by(assignment_id: @assignment.id, questionnaire_id: questionnaire.id).used_in_round
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb by rubocop

This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

Perceived complexity for add_reviews is too high. [9/7]
Open

  def add_reviews(participant, team, vary)
    if @questionnaire_type == "ReviewQuestionnaire"
      reviews = if vary
                  ReviewResponseMap.get_responses_for_team_round(team, @round)
                else
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb by rubocop

This cop tries to produce a complexity score that's a measure of the complexity the reader experiences when looking at a method. For that reason it considers when nodes as something that doesn't add as much complexity as an if or a &&. Except if it's one of those special case/when constructs where there's no expression after case. Then the cop treats it as an if/elsif/elsif... and lets all the when nodes count. In contrast to the CyclomaticComplexity cop, this cop considers else nodes as adding complexity.

Example:

def my_method                   # 1
  if cond                       # 1
    case var                    # 2 (0.8 + 4 * 0.2, rounded)
    when 1 then func_one
    when 2 then func_two
    when 3 then func_three
    when 4..10 then func_other
    end
  else                          # 1
    do_something until a && b   # 2
  end                           # ===
end                             # 7 complexity points

Method add_reviews has 45 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

  def add_reviews(participant, team, vary)
    if @questionnaire_type == "ReviewQuestionnaire"
      reviews = if vary
                  ReviewResponseMap.get_responses_for_team_round(team, @round)
                else
Severity: Minor
Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cyclomatic complexity for add_reviews is too high. [7/6]
    Open

      def add_reviews(participant, team, vary)
    if @questionnaire_type == "ReviewQuestionnaire"
      reviews = if vary
                  ReviewResponseMap.get_responses_for_team_round(team, @round)
                else
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks that the cyclomatic complexity of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The cyclomatic complexity is the number of linearly independent paths through a method. The algorithm counts decision points and adds one.

    An if statement (or unless or ?:) increases the complexity by one. An else branch does not, since it doesn't add a decision point. The && operator (or keyword and) can be converted to a nested if statement, and ||/or is shorthand for a sequence of ifs, so they also add one. Loops can be said to have an exit condition, so they add one.

    Assignment Branch Condition size for number_of_comments_greater_than_10_words is too high. [15.43/15]
    Open

      def number_of_comments_greater_than_10_words
    @list_of_reviews.each do |review|
      answers = Answer.where(response_id: review.response_id)
      answers.each do |answer|
        @list_of_rows.each do |row|
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks that the ABC size of methods is not higher than the configured maximum. The ABC size is based on assignments, branches (method calls), and conditions. See http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?AbcMetric

    Method add_answer has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def add_answer(answer)
    # We want to add each response score from this review (answer) to its corresponding
    # question row.
    @list_of_rows.each do |row|
      next unless row.question_id == answer.question_id
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Method add_reviews has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring.
    Open

      def add_reviews(participant, team, vary)
    if @questionnaire_type == "ReviewQuestionnaire"
      reviews = if vary
                  ReviewResponseMap.get_responses_for_team_round(team, @round)
                else
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb - About 1 hr to fix

    Cognitive Complexity

    Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

    A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

    • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
    • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
    • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

    Further reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          reviews = participant.feedback # feedback reviews
      reviews.each do |review|
        review_mapping = FeedbackResponseMap.find_by(id: review.map_id)
        participant = Participant.find(review_mapping.reviewer_id)
        @list_of_reviewers << participant
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb and 2 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
    app/models/vm_question_response.rb on lines 69..76
    app/models/vm_question_response.rb on lines 79..84

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 27.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          reviews = participant.metareviews
      reviews.each do |review|
        review_mapping = MetareviewResponseMap.find_by(id: review.map_id)
        participant = Participant.find(review_mapping.reviewer_id)
        @list_of_reviewers << participant
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb and 2 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
    app/models/vm_question_response.rb on lines 61..66
    app/models/vm_question_response.rb on lines 69..76

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 27.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 3 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

          reviews = participant.teammate_reviews
      reviews.each do |review|
        review_mapping = TeammateReviewResponseMap.find_by(id: review.map_id)
        participant = Participant.find(review_mapping.reviewer_id)
        # commenting out teamreviews. I just realized that teammate reviews are hidden during the current semester,
    Severity: Minor
    Found in app/models/vm_question_response.rb and 2 other locations - About 20 mins to fix
    app/models/vm_question_response.rb on lines 61..66
    app/models/vm_question_response.rb on lines 79..84

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 27.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status