ece517-p3/expertiza

View on GitHub
spec/factories/factories.rb

Summary

Maintainability
D
2 days
Test Coverage

Block has too many lines. [412/25]
Open

FactoryBot.define do
  factory :institution, class: Institution do
    name 'North Carolina State University'
  end

Severity: Minor
Found in spec/factories/factories.rb by rubocop

This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.

File factories.rb has 414 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

FactoryBot.define do
  factory :institution, class: Institution do
    name 'North Carolina State University'
  end

Severity: Minor
Found in spec/factories/factories.rb - About 5 hrs to fix

    Block has too many lines. [40/25]
    Open

      factory :assignment, class: Assignment do
        name 'final2'
        directory_path 'final_test'
        submitter_count 0
        course { Course.first || association(:course) }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks if the length of a block exceeds some maximum value. Comment lines can optionally be ignored. The maximum allowed length is configurable. The cop can be configured to ignore blocks passed to certain methods.

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      factory :superadmin, class: User do
        sequence(:name) {|n| "superadmin#{n}" }
        role { Role.where(name: 'Super-Administrator').first || association(:role_of_superadministrator) }
        password 'password'
        password_confirmation 'password'
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    spec/factories/factories.rb on lines 36..55

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 65.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      factory :admin, class: User do
        sequence(:name) {|n| "admin#{n}" }
        role { Role.where(name: 'Administrator').first || association(:role_of_administrator) }
        password 'password'
        password_confirmation 'password'
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    spec/factories/factories.rb on lines 58..77

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 65.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      factory :instructor, class: Instructor do
        name 'instructor6'
        role { Role.where(name: 'Instructor').first || association(:role_of_instructor) }
        password 'password'
        password_confirmation 'password'
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    spec/factories/factories.rb on lines 125..144

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 54.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      factory :teaching_assistant, class: Ta do
        name 'teaching_assistant5888'
        role { Role.where(name: 'Teaching Assistant').first || association(:role_of_teaching_assistant) }
        password 'password'
        password_confirmation 'password'
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    spec/factories/factories.rb on lines 103..122

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 54.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      factory :assignment_due_date, class: AssignmentDueDate do
        due_at DateTime.now.in_time_zone + 1.day
        deadline_type { DeadlineType.first || association(:deadline_type) }
        assignment { Assignment.first || association(:assignment) }
        submission_allowed_id 3
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    spec/factories/factories.rb on lines 307..322

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 52.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      factory :topic_due_date, class: TopicDueDate do
        due_at DateTime.now.in_time_zone + 1.day
        deadline_type { DeadlineType.first || association(:deadline_type) }
        topic { SignUpTopic.first || association(:topic) }
        submission_allowed_id 3
    Severity: Major
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb and 1 other location - About 1 hr to fix
    spec/factories/factories.rb on lines 289..304

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 52.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      factory :participant, class: AssignmentParticipant do
        can_submit true
        can_review true
        assignment { Assignment.first || association(:assignment) }
        association :user, factory: :student
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
    spec/factories/factories.rb on lines 264..278

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 43.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      factory :course_participant, class: CourseParticipant do
        can_submit true
        can_review true
        course { Course.first || association(:course) }
        association :user, factory: :student
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb and 1 other location - About 50 mins to fix
    spec/factories/factories.rb on lines 247..261

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 43.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      factory :course_team, class: CourseTeam do
        sequence(:name) {|n| "team#{n}" }
        course { Course.first || association(:course) }
        type 'CourseTeam'
        comments_for_advertisement nil
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
    spec/factories/factories.rb on lines 199..207

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 31.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
    Open

      factory :assignment_team, class: AssignmentTeam do
        sequence(:name) {|n| "team#{n}" }
        assignment { Assignment.first || association(:assignment) }
        type 'AssignmentTeam'
        comments_for_advertisement nil
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb and 1 other location - About 25 mins to fix
    spec/factories/factories.rb on lines 210..218

    Duplicated Code

    Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

    Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

    When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

    Tuning

    This issue has a mass of 31.

    We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

    The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

    If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

    See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

    Refactorings

    Further Reading

    Prefer Date or Time over DateTime.
    Open

        due_at DateTime.now.in_time_zone + 1.day
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks for uses of DateTime that should be replaced by Date or Time.

    Example:

    # bad - uses `DateTime` for current time
    DateTime.now
    
    # good - uses `Time` for current time
    Time.now
    
    # bad - uses `DateTime` for modern date
    DateTime.iso8601('2016-06-29')
    
    # good - uses `Date` for modern date
    Date.iso8601('2016-06-29')
    
    # good - uses `DateTime` with start argument for historical date
    DateTime.iso8601('1751-04-23', Date::ENGLAND)

    Do not use semicolons to terminate expressions.
    Open

        sequence(:name) {|n| n = n % 3; "student206#{n + 4}" }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks for multiple expressions placed on the same line. It also checks for lines terminated with a semicolon.

    Example:

    # bad
    foo = 1; bar = 2;
    baz = 3;
    
    # good
    foo = 1
    bar = 2
    baz = 3

    Final newline missing.
    Open

    end
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb by rubocop

    Do not use Time.now without zone. Use one of Time.zone.now, Time.current, Time.now.in_time_zone, Time.now.utc, Time.now.getlocal, Time.now.iso8601, Time.now.jisx0301, Time.now.rfc3339, Time.now.to_i, Time.now.to_f instead.
    Open

        created_at Time.now
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks for the use of Time methods without zone.

    Built on top of Ruby on Rails style guide (https://github.com/bbatsov/rails-style-guide#time) and the article http://danilenko.org/2012/7/6/rails_timezones/ .

    Two styles are supported for this cop. When EnforcedStyle is 'strict' then only use of Time.zone is allowed.

    When EnforcedStyle is 'flexible' then it's also allowed to use Time.intimezone.

    Example:

    # always offense
    Time.now
    Time.parse('2015-03-02 19:05:37')
    
    # no offense
    Time.zone.now
    Time.zone.parse('2015-03-02 19:05:37')
    
    # no offense only if style is 'flexible'
    Time.current
    DateTime.strptime(str, "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M %Z").in_time_zone
    Time.at(timestamp).in_time_zone

    Do not use semicolons to terminate expressions.
    Open

        sequence(:fullname) {|n| n = n % 3; "206#{n + 4}, student" }
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks for multiple expressions placed on the same line. It also checks for lines terminated with a semicolon.

    Example:

    # bad
    foo = 1; bar = 2;
    baz = 3;
    
    # good
    foo = 1
    bar = 2
    baz = 3

    Prefer Date or Time over DateTime.
    Open

        due_at DateTime.now.in_time_zone + 1.day
    Severity: Minor
    Found in spec/factories/factories.rb by rubocop

    This cop checks for uses of DateTime that should be replaced by Date or Time.

    Example:

    # bad - uses `DateTime` for current time
    DateTime.now
    
    # good - uses `Time` for current time
    Time.now
    
    # bad - uses `DateTime` for modern date
    DateTime.iso8601('2016-06-29')
    
    # good - uses `Date` for modern date
    Date.iso8601('2016-06-29')
    
    # good - uses `DateTime` with start argument for historical date
    DateTime.iso8601('1751-04-23', Date::ENGLAND)

    There are no issues that match your filters.

    Category
    Status