Function trac_get_reference
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def trac_get_reference(env, context, rawtext, target, text):
fulltext = target + ' ' + text if text else target
link = extract_link(env, context, fulltext)
uri = None
missing = False
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function render
has a Cognitive Complexity of 15 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render(self, context, mimetype, content, filename=None, rev=None):
# Minimize visual impact of errors
class TracHTMLTranslator(html4css1.HTMLTranslator):
"""Specialized translator with unobtrusive error reporting
and some extra security features.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function trac_directive
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def trac_directive(name, arguments, options, content, lineno,
content_offset, block_text, state, state_machine):
"""Inserts a `reference` node into the document for a given
`TracLink`_, based on the content of the arguments.
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function trac_directive
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def trac_directive(name, arguments, options, content, lineno,
Function code_block_directive
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def code_block_directive(name, arguments, options, content, lineno,
Function trac_role
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def trac_role(name, rawtext, text, lineno, inliner, options={},
content=[]):
if hasattr(inliner, 'trac'):
env, context = inliner.trac
args = text.split(" ", 1)
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function code_block_role
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def code_block_role(name, rawtext, text, lineno, inliner, options={},
Function trac_role
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def trac_role(name, rawtext, text, lineno, inliner, options={},
Function code_block_role
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def code_block_role(name, rawtext, text, lineno, inliner, options={},
content=[]):
if not hasattr(inliner, 'trac'):
return [], []
env, context = inliner.trac
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function render
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def render(self, context, mimetype, content, filename=None, rev=None):
Function trac_get_reference
has 5 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def trac_get_reference(env, context, rawtext, target, text):
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def depart_reference(self, node):
if self._is_safe_uri(node.get('refuri')):
html4css1.HTMLTranslator.depart_reference(self, node)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 35.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def visit_reference(self, node):
if self._is_safe_uri(node.get('refuri')):
html4css1.HTMLTranslator.visit_reference(self, node)
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 35.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76