Sign upLogin

eendroroy/rspikes

View on GitHub
Star
rspikes.gemspec

Summary

Maintainability
Test Coverage

required_ruby_version (2.0, declared in rspikes.gemspec) and TargetRubyVersion (2.1, declared in .rubocop.yml) should be equal.
Open

  spec.required_ruby_version = '>= 2.0.0'
Severity: Minor
Found in rspikes.gemspec by rubocop

Checks that required_ruby_version of gemspec and TargetRubyVersion of .rubocop.yml are equal. Thereby, RuboCop to perform static analysis working on the version required by gemspec.

Example:

# When `TargetRubyVersion` of .rubocop.yml is `2.3`.

# bad
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.required_ruby_version = '>= 2.2.0'
end

# bad
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.required_ruby_version = '>= 2.4.0'
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.required_ruby_version = '>= 2.3.0'
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.required_ruby_version = '>= 2.3'
end

# good
Gem::Specification.new do |spec|
  spec.required_ruby_version = ['>= 2.3.0', '< 2.5.0']
end

Favor modifier unless usage when having a single-line body. Another good alternative is the usage of control flow &&/||.
Open

  unless spec.respond_to?(:metadata)
Severity: Minor
Found in rspikes.gemspec by rubocop

Checks for if and unless statements that would fit on one line if written as a modifier if/unless. The maximum line length is configured in the Metrics/LineLength cop.

Example:

# bad
if condition
  do_stuff(bar)
end

unless qux.empty?
  Foo.do_something
end

# good
do_stuff(bar) if condition
Foo.do_something unless qux.empty?

There are no issues that match your filters.

Category
Status