ekristen/aws-nuke

View on GitHub

Showing 50 of 54 total issues

Method S3BucketLister.List has a Cognitive Complexity of 23 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (l *S3BucketLister) List(ctx context.Context, o interface{}) ([]resource.Resource, error) {
    opts := o.(*nuke.ListerOpts)
    svc := s3.NewFromConfig(*opts.Config)

    buckets, err := DescribeS3Buckets(ctx, svc)
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/s3-bucket.go - About 45 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method LexModelBuildingServiceBotAliasLister.List has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (l *LexModelBuildingServiceBotAliasLister) List(_ context.Context, o interface{}) ([]resource.Resource, error) {
    opts := o.(*nuke.ListerOpts)

    svc := lexmodelbuildingservice.New(opts.Session)
    resources := make([]resource.Resource, 0)
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/lex-model-building-service-bot-alias.go - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method IoTSiteWiseProjectLister.List has a Cognitive Complexity of 22 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (l *IoTSiteWiseProjectLister) List(_ context.Context, o interface{}) ([]resource.Resource, error) {
    opts := o.(*nuke.ListerOpts)

    svc := iotsitewise.New(opts.Session)
    resources := make([]resource.Resource, 0)
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/iotsitewise-project.go - About 35 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if len(iter.objects) > 500 && (iter.lastNotify.IsZero() || time.Since(iter.lastNotify) > 120*time.Second) {
        logrus.Infof(
            "S3Bucket: %s - empty bucket operation in progress, this could take a while, please be patient",
            *iter.Bucket)
        iter.lastNotify = time.Now().UTC()
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/s3-bucket.go and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
resources/s3-bucket.go on lines 339..344

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 101.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if len(iter.objects) > 500 && (iter.lastNotify.IsZero() || time.Since(iter.lastNotify) > 120*time.Second) {
        logrus.Infof(
            "S3Bucket: %s - empty bucket operation in progress, this could take a while, please be patient",
            *iter.Bucket)
        iter.lastNotify = time.Now().UTC()
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/s3-bucket.go and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
resources/s3-bucket.go on lines 413..418

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 101.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if err != nil {
        // SES capabilities aren't the same in all regions, for example us-west-1 will throw InvalidAction
        // errors, but other regions work, this allows us to safely ignore these and yet log them in debug logs
        // should we need to troubleshoot.
        var awsError awserr.Error
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/ses-receiptfilters.go and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
resources/ses-receiptrulesets.go on lines 41..54

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 100.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring.
Open

    if err != nil {
        // SES capabilities aren't the same in all regions, for example us-west-1 will throw InvalidAction
        // errors, but other regions work, this allows us to safely ignore these and yet log them in debug logs
        // should we need to troubleshoot.
        var awsError awserr.Error
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/ses-receiptrulesets.go and 1 other location - About 30 mins to fix
resources/ses-receiptfilters.go on lines 40..53

Duplicated Code

Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:

Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.

When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).

Tuning

This issue has a mass of 100.

We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.

The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.

If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.

See codeclimate-duplication's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml.

Refactorings

Further Reading

Method EKSFargateProfileLister.List has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (l *EKSFargateProfileLister) List(_ context.Context, o interface{}) ([]resource.Resource, error) {
    opts := o.(*nuke.ListerOpts)
    svc := eks.New(opts.Session)
    var clusterNames []*string
    var resources []resource.Resource
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/eks-fargate-profile.go - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Function skipGlobalHandler has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func skipGlobalHandler(global bool) func(r *request.Request) {
    return func(r *request.Request) {
        service := r.ClientInfo.ServiceName
        if service == s3control.ServiceName {
            service = s3control.EndpointsID
Severity: Minor
Found in pkg/awsutil/session.go - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Method EKSNodegroupLister.List has a Cognitive Complexity of 21 (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring.
Open

func (l *EKSNodegroupLister) List(_ context.Context, o interface{}) ([]resource.Resource, error) {
    opts := o.(*nuke.ListerOpts)
    svc := eks.New(opts.Session)

    var clusterNames []*string
Severity: Minor
Found in resources/eks-nodegroups.go - About 25 mins to fix

Cognitive Complexity

Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.

A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:

  • Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
  • Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
  • Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"

Further reading

Severity
Category
Status
Source
Language