File Metadata.class.ts
has 456 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
/**
* @author Nicolas CARPi <nico-git@deltablot.email>
* @copyright 2012 Nicolas CARPi
* @see https://www.elabftw.net Official website
* @license AGPL-3.0
Function generateInput
has a Cognitive Complexity of 36 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
generateInput(name: string, properties: ExtraFieldProperties): Element {
// we don't know yet which kind of element it will be
let element: HTMLInputElement|HTMLSelectElement;
// generate a unique id for the element so we can associate the label properly
const uniqid = this.getRandomId();
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function generateInput
has 124 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
generateInput(name: string, properties: ExtraFieldProperties): Element {
// we don't know yet which kind of element it will be
let element: HTMLInputElement|HTMLSelectElement;
// generate a unique id for the element so we can associate the label properly
const uniqid = this.getRandomId();
Function edit
has 83 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
edit(): Promise<void> {
return this.read().then(json => {
this.editor.refresh(json as ValidMetadata);
// do nothing more if there is no extra_fields in our json
if (!Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty.call(json, 'extra_fields')) {
Function handleEvent
has a Cognitive Complexity of 14 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
handleEvent(event: Event): Promise<Response> | boolean {
const el = event.target as HTMLFormElement;
if (el.reportValidity() === false || el.hasAttribute('readonly')) {
return false;
}
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function handleEvent
has 38 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
handleEvent(event: Event): Promise<Response> | boolean {
const el = event.target as HTMLFormElement;
if (el.reportValidity() === false || el.hasAttribute('readonly')) {
return false;
}
Function getGroups
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getGroups(mode: string, json: ValidMetadata) {
// collect all extra fields, normalize position and group_id, add an element property
const elements = [];
for (const [name, properties] of Object.entries(json.extra_fields)) {
// 0 is a valid position, so don't do something with "|| 9999"
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function generateViewableElement
has 34 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
generateViewableElement(name: string, properties: ExtraFieldProperties): Element {
const wrapperDiv = document.createElement('div');
wrapperDiv.classList.add('d-flex');
// name + description
const nameWrapper = document.createElement('div');
Function getGroups
has 31 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
getGroups(mode: string, json: ValidMetadata) {
// collect all extra fields, normalize position and group_id, add an element property
const elements = [];
for (const [name, properties] of Object.entries(json.extra_fields)) {
// 0 is a valid position, so don't do something with "|| 9999"
Function buildRadio
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
buildRadio(name: string, properties: ExtraFieldProperties): Element { // eslint-disable-line
// a div to hold the different elements so we can return a single Element
const element = document.createElement('div');
element.dataset.purpose = 'radio-holder';
Function generateViewableElement
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
generateViewableElement(name: string, properties: ExtraFieldProperties): Element {
const wrapperDiv = document.createElement('div');
wrapperDiv.classList.add('d-flex');
// name + description
const nameWrapper = document.createElement('div');
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Avoid too many return
statements within this function. Open
return true;
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (const element of groupedArr[group.id].sort((a: ExtraFieldProperties, b: ExtraFieldProperties) => a.position - b.position)) {
groupWrapperDiv.append(element.element);
}
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Identical blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
for (const element of groupedArr[group.id].sort((a: ExtraFieldProperties, b: ExtraFieldProperties) => a.position - b.position)) {
const listItem = document.createElement('li');
listItem.classList.add('list-group-item');
const labelDiv = document.createElement('div');
labelDiv.classList.add('d-flex', 'justify-content-between');
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 47.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76