File check_protocol_compatibility.py
has 378 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
#!/usr/bin/env python
# Copyright (c) 2011 Google Inc. All rights reserved.
#
# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are
Function main
has a Cognitive Complexity of 17 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def main():
if not self_test():
sys.stderr.write("Self-test failed")
return 1
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function normalize_types
has a Cognitive Complexity of 13 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def normalize_types(obj, domain_name, types):
if isinstance(obj, list):
for item in obj:
normalize_types(item, domain_name, types)
elif isinstance(obj, dict):
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compare_types
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compare_types(context, kind, type_1, type_2, types_map_1, types_map_2, depth, errors, reverse):
if depth > 5:
return
base_type_1 = type_1["type"]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compare_params_list
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compare_params_list(context, kind, params_1, params_2, types_map_1, types_map_2, depth, errors, reverse):
Function compare_types
has 9 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compare_types(context, kind, type_1, type_2, types_map_1, types_map_2, depth, errors, reverse):
Function compare_events
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compare_events(domain_name, event_1, event_2, types_map_1, types_map_2, errors, reverse):
Function compare_commands
has 7 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compare_commands(domain_name, command_1, command_2, types_map_1, types_map_2, errors, reverse):
Function compare_params_list
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compare_params_list(context, kind, params_1, params_2, types_map_1, types_map_2, depth, errors, reverse):
for name in params_1:
param_1 = params_1[name]
if name not in params_2:
if "optional" not in param_1:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compare_domains
has 6 arguments (exceeds 4 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compare_domains(domain_1, domain_2, types_map_1, types_map_2, errors, reverse):
Function extract_type
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def extract_type(typed_object, types_map, errors):
if "type" in typed_object:
result = {"id": "<transient>", "type": typed_object["type"]}
if typed_object["type"] == "object":
result["properties"] = []
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function self_test
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def self_test():
def create_test_schema_1():
return [
{
"domain": "Network",
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Function compare_domains
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def compare_domains(domain_1, domain_2, types_map_1, types_map_2, errors, reverse):
domain_name = domain_1["domain"]
commands_1 = named_list_to_map(domain_1, "commands", "name")
commands_2 = named_list_to_map(domain_2, "commands", "name")
for name in commands_1:
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Identical blocks of code found in 4 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 2857.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76