Showing 24 of 24 total issues
File ipcommerce.rb
has 385 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'multi_json'
require 'multi_xml'
require 'net/http'
module VaultedBilling
Class Ipcommerce
has 28 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class Ipcommerce
include VaultedBilling::Gateway
AvsResults = [
"Not Set", "Not Included", "Match", "No Match", "Issuer Not Certified",
Method card_data
has a Cognitive Complexity of 20 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def card_data(credit_card)
return nil if credit_card.nil?
{
'PaymentAccountDataToken' => credit_card.vault_id,
'CardData' => {
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Class AuthorizeNetCim
has 23 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class AuthorizeNetCim
include VaultedBilling::Gateway
attr_accessor :use_test_uri
def initialize(options = {})
File authorize_net_cim.rb
has 264 lines of code (exceeds 250 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
require 'builder'
require 'multi_xml'
module VaultedBilling
module Gateways
Class NmiCustomerVault
has 21 methods (exceeds 20 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
class NmiCustomerVault
include VaultedBilling::Gateway
attr_accessor :use_test_uri
def initialize(options = {})
Method billing_info!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 16 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def billing_info!(xml, customer, credit_card)
xml.billTo do
xml.firstName credit_card.first_name if credit_card.first_name.present?
xml.lastName credit_card.last_name if credit_card.last_name.present?
xml.address credit_card.street_address if credit_card.street_address.present?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method refund
has a Cognitive Complexity of 12 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def refund(transaction_id, amount, options = {})
data = build_request('createCustomerProfileTransactionRequest') { |xml|
xml.transaction do
xml.profileTransRefund do
xml.amount amount
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method request
has 32 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request(method, uris, body = nil, options = {})
uri = uris.shift || raise(ArgumentError, "URI is empty")
request = case method
when :get
Method authorize
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def authorize(customer, credit_card, amount, options = {})
credit_card = credit_card.to_vaulted_billing
data = {
"__type" => "AuthorizeTransaction:http://schemas.ipcommerce.com/CWS/v2.0/Transactions/Rest",
:ApplicationProfileId => @application_id,
Method purchase
has 28 lines of code (exceeds 25 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def purchase(customer, credit_card, amount, options = {})
credit_card = credit_card.try(:to_vaulted_billing)
data = {
"__type" => "AuthorizeAndCaptureTransaction:http://schemas.ipcommerce.com/CWS/v2.0/Transactions/Rest",
:ApplicationProfileId => @application_id,
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def authorize(customer, credit_card, amount, options = {})
customer = customer.to_vaulted_billing
credit_card = credit_card.to_vaulted_billing
data = build_request('createCustomerProfileTransactionRequest') { |xml|
xml.transaction do
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Similar blocks of code found in 2 locations. Consider refactoring. Open
def purchase(customer, credit_card, amount, options = {})
customer = customer.to_vaulted_billing
credit_card = credit_card.to_vaulted_billing
data = build_request('createCustomerProfileTransactionRequest') { |xml|
xml.transaction do
- Read upRead up
Duplicated Code
Duplicated code can lead to software that is hard to understand and difficult to change. The Don't Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle states:
Every piece of knowledge must have a single, unambiguous, authoritative representation within a system.
When you violate DRY, bugs and maintenance problems are sure to follow. Duplicated code has a tendency to both continue to replicate and also to diverge (leaving bugs as two similar implementations differ in subtle ways).
Tuning
This issue has a mass of 51.
We set useful threshold defaults for the languages we support but you may want to adjust these settings based on your project guidelines.
The threshold configuration represents the minimum mass a code block must have to be analyzed for duplication. The lower the threshold, the more fine-grained the comparison.
If the engine is too easily reporting duplication, try raising the threshold. If you suspect that the engine isn't catching enough duplication, try lowering the threshold. The best setting tends to differ from language to language.
See codeclimate-duplication
's documentation for more information about tuning the mass threshold in your .codeclimate.yml
.
Refactorings
- Extract Method
- Extract Class
- Form Template Method
- Introduce Null Object
- Pull Up Method
- Pull Up Field
- Substitute Algorithm
Further Reading
- Don't Repeat Yourself on the C2 Wiki
- Duplicated Code on SourceMaking
- Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code by Martin Fowler. Duplicated Code, p76
Method new_transaction_from_response
has a Cognitive Complexity of 10 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def new_transaction_from_response(response)
if response.success?
Transaction.new({
:id => response.body['TransactionId'],
:avs_response => parse_avs_result(response.body['AVSResult']),
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method credit_card_info!
has a Cognitive Complexity of 9 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def credit_card_info!(xml, customer, credit_card)
xml.payment do
xml.creditCard do
xml.cardNumber credit_card.card_number if credit_card.card_number.present?
xml.expirationDate credit_card.expires_on.strftime("%Y-%m") if credit_card.expires_on.present?
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method add_customer
has a Cognitive Complexity of 8 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def add_customer(customer)
customer = customer.to_vaulted_billing
data = build_request('createCustomerProfileRequest') do |xml|
xml.tag!('profile') do
xml.merchantCustomerId customer.merchant_id if customer.merchant_id
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method respond_with
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def respond_with(object, response = nil, options = {}, &block)
super(object, options, &block).tap do |o|
if response
o.raw_response = response.raw_response.try(:body)
o.connection_error = response.connection_error
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method respond_with
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def respond_with(object, options = {})
object.tap do |o|
o.extend(VaultedBilling::Gateway::Response)
o.success = options.has_key?(:success) ? options[:success] : true
o.raw_response = options[:raw_response] || ''
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method request
has a Cognitive Complexity of 7 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def request(method, uris, body = nil, options = {})
uri = uris.shift || raise(ArgumentError, "URI is empty")
request = case method
when :get
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"
Further reading
Method initialize
has a Cognitive Complexity of 6 (exceeds 5 allowed). Consider refactoring. Open
def initialize(options = {})
options = options.with_indifferent_access
self.test_mode = options.has_key?(:test_mode) ? options[:test_mode] : true
@_authorize_net_cim = GatewayConfiguration.new(options[:authorize_net_cim]) if options[:authorize_net_cim]
@_ipcommerce = GatewayConfiguration.new(options[:ipcommerce]) if options[:ipcommerce]
- Read upRead up
Cognitive Complexity
Cognitive Complexity is a measure of how difficult a unit of code is to intuitively understand. Unlike Cyclomatic Complexity, which determines how difficult your code will be to test, Cognitive Complexity tells you how difficult your code will be to read and comprehend.
A method's cognitive complexity is based on a few simple rules:
- Code is not considered more complex when it uses shorthand that the language provides for collapsing multiple statements into one
- Code is considered more complex for each "break in the linear flow of the code"
- Code is considered more complex when "flow breaking structures are nested"